Dismissed¶38

Smt. K. Nirmala, Ranga Reddy Dist. v. Commr., Ghmc, Hyd. and Ano.

Telangana HC4 Dec 2025WP/27193/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P. 27193/2014, K. Nirmala v. GHMC respondents, dismissed for non-prosecution on 04-12-2025 by Justice Laxmi Narayana Alishetty; impugned GHMC Deputy Commissioner (Circle XI) order dated 25-03-2014 left unexamined; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, as none appeared for the petitioner who appears not interested in prosecuting the matter; there shall be no order as to costs. ¶38

Smt. K. Nirmala, Ranga Reddy Dist. Vs Commr… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

[³³⁸³ I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

¶5

tro"",*L?ilf'="If,?t?iction)

¶6

THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETW

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO: 27193 OF 2014

¶10

Be.tween:

¶11

Smt. K Nirmala Wo Krishna , age 34 years, housewife R/o 1-111111C1514 Kondapur RangaReddy District

¶12

..pETrroNER

¶13

AND

¶14

The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank^Bund Road, Hyderabad.

¶15

Deputy Commissioner, Circle No.Xl, Greater Hyderabad^Municipal Corporation, Serili ngampally, R. R. District.

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of^{lndiapraying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, and more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring 2nd Respondents order No.UC/TPSM.No.ll2lCir.XlWztc1MCtzotq dated 2s-03-2014 as iilegat, arbitrary, unjust, without jurisdiction, nult and void and consequenly set aside the same

¶18

, - -.(o.ld'

¶19

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 34050 OF 2014)

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affida uit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to 2nd respondent's orders dated 25.03.201 4 n No.UC/TPSM.No.1 1 2lcu.XllWZlGHMCl2}14, pending disposal of the writ petition

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. BATHINI PAPA RAO GOUD Counsel for the Respondents: SRI G. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY (sc FoR GHMC )

¶22

The Court matle the following: ORDER

¶23

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICC LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY N of 4

¶24

DATE OF ORDER: O4. t2.ZOZs

BETWEEN:

K.Nirmala

Petitioner AND

The Commissioner,

GHMC, Hyderabad and another

¶30

... Respondents

¶31

This writ petition is fired to declare the action of respondent No.2 in issuing order No.uclTpS/w.No .Lr2 /cir.xr/wz/cHMc/ { 2074, dated 2s.03.2o14, as illegar and arbitrary and to set aside the sarne..

¶32

(

¶33

2 No representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶34

3 I sri G'Madhusudhan Reddy, rearned standing counsel for respondents, is present. I

¶35

4 ' when the writ petition was listed on rv . r r .2o2s and 28'17'2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner ' and as such, this court directed the matter to be listed under the .-- --.--.--.-. caption for dismissal,.

¶36

¶37

Eve:: though the matter is listed today under the caption for dismissal', none appears for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.

¶38