Mendi Venkatamma, Vs The State of Telangana.

¶1

3.[ 31681

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO:26829 OF 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

1 . Mendi Venkatamma, D/o Late Mallanna Aged about 45 Years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o 5-24, Nawabpet, Mahbubnagar Town and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District- 50900 1 .

¶9

Golla Padma, Wo Golla Krishna, D/o Late Mallanna, Aged about 44 Years, Occ. Agriculture, Rlo 16-2-740n5120, V K Dhage Nagar, Near Rekha Rani Hospital, Gaddiannaram, Ranga Reddy District - 500 060.

¶10

Parvathi Shanthamma, D/o Late Mallanna Aged about 39 Years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o 3-'1340/4, Veerannapet, Mahbubnagar Town and Mandal, Mahabubnaqar District- 50s001

¶11

...pETraoNERs

¶12

AND

¶13

The State of Telangana., Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Hyderabad.

¶14

The District Collector, lvlahabubnagar Diskict, Telangana State.

¶15

The Revenue Divisional Officer, (RDO), Mahabubnagar Division, Mahabubnagar District.

¶16

The Tahsildar cum Sub-registrar, Mahabubnagar Urban Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

¶17

Parvathi Venkatesh, S/o Late Mallanna, Aged about 44 Years, Occ. Agriculture, PJo Mahbubnagar, Mahbubnagar(Urban) Mandal, Mahabubnagar Distric! 509001.

¶18

Parvathi Jagan Yadav @ Jangaiah, S/o Late Mallanna, Aged about 37 Years, Occ. Govt. Employee, R/o 3-13-40/A, Veerannapet, Near Post Office, Mahbubnagar Town and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District- 509001 .

¶19

Parvathi@Mekala Swetha, Wo Jagan Yadav @Jangaiah, Aged about 30 Years, Occ. House Wife, R/o 3-13-40/A, Veerannapet, Near Post Office, Mahbubnagar Town and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District- 509001.

¶20

Sevakula Venkataramulu, S/o Late Anjanna, Aged about 65Years, Occ. Agriculture, Rlo 144-1651N2, Bhageeratha Colony, Mahbubnagar Town and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District- 509001.

¶21

Baru Rajashekar, S/o Krishnaiah, Aged about 55Years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o 4-6-5012, Kisan Nagar, Mahbubnagar Town and Mandal, Mahabubnagar District- 5o9oo1

¶22

..RESPoNDENTS

¶23

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutircn of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of

¶24

7

¶25

I

¶26

MANDAMUS By declaring the in action of the respondent no.2 to 4 in considering the application vide Ref.No.C'1250007468 and C'1250007469, d1.21.O8.2025 made for court case intimation in Bhubarathi Portal for the land an extent of Ac.2.18 gts in Sy.No.853(old) now New Sy.Nos.853A2, 853A1, 853/1 , 853/2 which are situated at Mahbubnagar, Mahbubnagar(Urban) Mandal, Mahabubnagar District erstwhile Bandameedipalli village and Gram panchayat sivar, Mahbubnagar Mandal, Mahabubnagar District to avoid the further transactions withdut notice to the petitioners, while^pending the Civil Suit vide O.S.No. 9412025 on the file of Senior Civil Judge at Mahabubnagar is illegal, and violation of Article 14, 19 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and violations of Provisions of ROR Act and consequently direct the respondent no.2 to 4 to consider the application vide Ref.No.C1250007468 and C1250007469. dt.21.08.2025

¶27

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶28

Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no 2 to 4 to consider the application vide ref .Nos C1250007468 and C1250007469, dt 21 08.2025 which was made by the petitioners forewith pending disposal of the main writ petition

¶29

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. NARSIMULU NEELI

¶30

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. tto4: SRI L. RAVINDER, AGP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5to9:-

¶31

The Court made thi following: ORDER

¶32

h

¶33

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.26829 of 2025

¶34

ORAL ORDER:

¶35

Heard leamed counsel for the petitioners and Mr,L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalfofrespondent Nos. I to 4.

¶36

According to the petitioners, land admeasuring Lc.2-18 guntas in Sy.Nos.853A2, 8534.1, 853/l and 853/2, situated at Mahbubnagar Mandal and District, is joint family property and it belonged to their father. After his death, the petitioners claim a share in the said property. Even then, respondent Nos.5 to 9 are trying to alienate the subject property to the third parties. Therefore, the petitioners have filed a suit in O.S.No.94 of 2025 on the file of the leamed Senior Civil Judge, Mahabubnagar, against respondent Nos.5 to 9, seeking partition and separate possession of the subject property. The said suit is still pending. An Interlocutory Application was also filed for restraining respondent Nos.5 to 9 fiom alienating, altering the physical features, or creating encumbrance over the subject property in favour of third

¶37

parties. The said lnterlocutory Application is also pending.

¶38

2

¶39

<br>

¶40

It is the specific case of the petitioners that, during the pendency of the said suit and interlocutory application, respondent Nos.5 to 9 are trying to alienate the subject property to the third parties. Therefore, the petitioners have submitted online applications bearing Id Nos. 21T522800003065 and 21T522800003066, dated 21.08.2025, to respondent No.4, with a request to include tle subject property in the Court Cases Module. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said application, respondent No.4 did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondent No.4, the petitioners have filed the present wnt petrtlon.

¶41

As discussed supr4 the aforesaid suit filed by the petitioners seeking partition and separate possession of the subject property and interlocutory application are admittedly pending belore the trial Court. During the pendency of the said suit and interlocutory application, the petitioners cannot submit online application to respondent No.4 with a request to include the subject property in the Court Cases Module and then file the present writ petition alleging non-consideration of the said application. The petitioners have to pursue the interlocutory application and suit, upon

¶42

3

¶43

I I I i ri l i

¶44

obtaining appropriate onders, they have to approach respondent

¶45

No.4, for implementation of such orders. Therefore, the petitioners

¶46

are not entitled to any relief, much less the relief sought in the

¶47

present wdt petition, and the same is liable to be dismissed.

¶48

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶49

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall

¶50

stand closed.

¶51

SD/. M.OSMAN ALI SISTANT RE

/ffRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

One CC to SRl. NARSIMULU^{NEELI,Advocate} [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR^REVENUE ,High^{Court for the State of Telangana at} Hyderabad [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies

BM PSK

HIGH COURT

DATED:0810912025

ORDER

1 t\E STA
i'
i. 2qllt{2$2t

¶61

WP.No.26829 of 2025