Smt. Puli Annapurna v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
Telangana High Court, W.P. No.26315 of 2025, Justice K. Lakshman; pattadar passbook; E-pattadar passbook; mutation application rejected without reasons; single-word rejection order non-est; order without application of mind; Fouthi Virasat 26.06.2019; succession to grandmother Smt. Sitapati Rajamma; Katnepalli Village, Sulthanabad Mandal, Peddapalli District; Sy.No.332; remand to Mandal Revenue Officer (respondent No.4) with notice and hearing; reasoned order requirement; 30-day compliance timeline; Section 151 CPC petition; Advocate V. Yadu Krishna Sainath for petitioner; L. Ravinder, AGP for Revenue for respondents; disposed of without costs.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of: the impugned rejection order is set aside and the matter is remanded to respondent No.4 to reconsider the petitioner's online application No. 2500016880 dated 12.03.2025 in accordance with law after notice and opportunity, with a reasoned and communicated order if rejected, within thirty (30) days; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed.