A writ petition seeking action on a representation against alleged illegal activities in an agency area and discontinuation of a contingent employee was withdrawn at the petitioner's request with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
Dismissal of writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition; pending IAs also disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 i i i:
a32521
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETHDAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THEHONOURABLEMRSJUSTICESUREPALLI NANDA
WR T PETITION NO:26217 OF204
Between:
VankudothNaresh, S/o. Haridasu,Aged34 years, Occ. Agric.ulture, 9q9te'pI ttaroiO;1,R/o.Anantharam ranoi, Seeiharampuram,singarenlMandal, Khammam District.
...pETrrroNER
AND
1.The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal SecretaryTribalWelfare Deoartment, Secretariat,Hyderabad, Telangana.
...REEPONDENTS
PetitiqpunderArtigle 226of the Constitutionof lndiA Itayqpthat in the circumgtancqs statgdin the affidavitfiled therewith, tfe High Qourt maybe pleased to i$que any writ, orderor direction,moreparticularly one in the nature of writ of MANbAMUS,declaringthe action of the respondent nos.2 and 3 in not taking 3ny Tction on therepresentationof the petitionerdafue! 25,07.2024 submittedagainstlheillegalandunlaMulactivitiesoftherespondqntno.4and6 under theployisiongof LTR Act 1 of 1970, further enga$ing the servi.cescf the 4th !'espondentas contingentemployee ln the office of the 3rd resPondent'a?
arbitrary, illegal, bacl in law, violativeof Article14 of the constitutionof lndia and consequently direc;t the respondentnos.2 to 4 to lodge a complaint againstthe respondent no. 2 and 3 to registerthe complaintfiled.againstrespondents4 and 5, further direct the respondents2 and 3 to discontinue the 4th respondent, further direct the 3r{ responclentto initiateproceedings under the regulationsof LTR act 'l of 197Q against tl'erespondent no.5claiming possegsion arld ownershiPin respect 9f the agriculturalland$ situate(in agencyarea,
IANO:1OF 2024
petitign unde'Section 151 CPC praying that in ![e circumstances Stated in the affidavit tiled in support of thepetitipn, the HighCou( may be pleasedto dlreat the respondeltnos. 2 and 3 to conqider the representallonof the petitionersdaled 25.Q7 2Q24 and tal(ing necessary actionon the 4th and sthrespondents under the LTBAct 1 of 1970,
IA O:2 OF 2024
Petitien unde' Section 151 CPCpraying thatin thecircumstances statQdin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HiSh Caurtmqy bepleasedto pass erdersto suspendthe notice bearing R.C.No.C181012024, datedtQ5-1 1-2024 by Aggncy Divisional Officer-cum-Revenue.Divisional Officer, Kalluru isguedto BospoQdents5 to 7 consequentto the ordeidated: 23-092Q24in l.A,No. 1 pf 2024 in W.P.no .26217 of 2024pending disposal of the writ pelition.
NO: oF2 24
Betwegn:
...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS
AND
...RESPoNDENrs/BFgPONDEryT$
pptition under Sectipn 101 CfQ praying thatin the cir;cumsienqes Ftated[n the affidavit {!lgdin support of the petition, tl.re High Court m?Y be plggsedt: ll.9q ordqrs to vaaate the interimorders dated: 23-09-2024pagsedin l.a.No.1 pf 2024 in W.P,[:lo. 7rg2tt 9f2024 in view of the facts submitted in t[9 countera{fldaVit of leqponQents5 to 7.
Counsel for thePetitioner:SRI P.V.L.BHANU PRAKASH ;;;$i tor ifibnespondentNos.1ro 3: GP FqRlgglrll.,\4lE-LLlIF.. cil+ifor ffieneifondentNo.4: $RlMANqAPATIMURALIKRI!$IA c;il;;i1 toiide nigbondentNos.5ro 7: $Rl S.MADANMA|,{4NB p
The Cqgrt m4{ethe follqwing:ORPER
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLT NANDA TP T ORDER: F o 4
Srip.V.L. Bhanu prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner :;eeks permission of the Court for withdrawal of the present lvrit petition. The learned counsel appearing on beharf of the petitionr er further submits that the petitioner rnay be given liberty to approach the Court by filing a fresh . writ petitic,n duly rectif mistakes that occurred whire firing the present -.,, ,J;,'""tte
2, permission is accorded. 3. Accorclingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn gr,anting liberty to the pe titioner to approach the Court by filinq a fresh Writ petition. However, there shall be no order aS til costs.
p"titioT:',';:i':?]i: jfj:,f n.i .ir a n y, pendins rn this Writ
\ To
SD/-L. LAKSHIUi BABU A T GISTRAR //TRUE COPYII J E OFFICER
rrl
I ,
HIGH COURT
DATED:3010112025
ORDER
WP.No.26217 of 2024
:, tre S1zr rC:
3
e
)z
ocq) ll 7 lJlA'i 2025 6)
r{'
* l
t.,eSPATCH
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION A8 WITHDRAWNWITHOUT COSTS
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Vankudoth Naresh
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department
The District Collector, Bhadradri Kothagudem District
The Additional Agent to Government-cum-Project Officer, ITDA Bhadrachalam
Jamm UaisEimha Rao
Pallepothula Srinivasa Rao
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
