Commissionerate, wherein it is submitted that the-.,, respondent has given complai,t dated 15.08.2025 to the 6th respo r rent stating that the Government has allotted i0.02 acres land in Sv llos.251 ,252 arrd 253 as P.T and the said land was handed or.er after conclucting panchanama in the ycar 2005. It is further sr lrnjlgs6 that one Zainab and others have filed W.p.No.8652 of 2OO9 L :fore the Hon,ble Court and the same was dismissed on 07.O2.2O2:. Sri Gudibandla Deepak and Gudrbandla Vijayabharathi are makinl constructions in Sy.No.251 and when the petitioner went to thar place, the said persons are attacking him. Since l99S he is in posr; ssion of the said land as PT and requested to take action on the cc r strr-rctions. It is further submitted that based on the above complzrrr t, 6rt, respondent made petition cntry and during cnquiry it revcaled hat W.A.No.230, 233,234 and 235 of 2O2S with rcgard to the land i-l Sy.Nos.251, 252 and 253 are pending before the Hon,ble Court wh: eby vide interim order dated 08.03.2O2S directed both parties r.e . Zairtab Bee and others (original owners) and 7fr respondent (pro.tcted tenants) to maintain status-quo. It is further submittcd that ince the dispute pertains to land and moreover Cour[ cases are pendi rg, tl-re complaint given by the 7tr respondent was closed as..Ci.r I in nature,, on 24.O8.2025. Irjs further submitted that except conrl rcting enquiry on the complaint, 66 respondent did not interferc in lht lispute.
