Disposed

Smt. Parvathi Madhav Yejage, v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC10 Jul 2025WP/2572/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought registration of a sale deed refused under a Government Order restricting registrations; an interim order had already secured registration. With the connected State appeal dismissed, the interim order was made absolute and the writ petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Interim order dated 30.01.2018 directing registration of the sale deed made absolute; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.

Smt. Parvathi Madhav Yejage, Vs State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰²¹

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^{TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD} (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.^SA.RATH

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 2572 OF 2018

¶7

Between:

¶8

SMT. PARVATHI MADHAV YEJAGE,^{Wife of Sri lr/adhav Yejage, aged56} years, Occ. Business, resident of 10-3-32/9/101, Rochi Apartment,^East ltrlarredpally, SECUNDERABAD - 500 026.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 State of Telangana, Rep. by Principal Secretary,^{To Government Department} of Revenue, Stamps and Registration, Secretariat,^HYDERABAD.

¶12

2 The District Registrar of Stamps and Assurance,^{Nampally, HYDERABAD-}

¶13

The Sub-Registrar of Stamps and Assurance^{(l,4arred pa lly), Bowenpally,} HYDERABAD

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution^{of lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^filed therewith, the^{High Court maybe} pleased to issue writ, order or direction more^particularly in the nature^{of WRIT} OF I,1ANDAIvIUS to declare the action^{of the Third Respondent in refusing to} receive, register and release the Sale^{Deedexecuted in favor of the Petitioner} herein, in respect of Flat No. 3,ⁱⁿ the Second^{Floor on the Southern Side, in} premises bearing No.'10-3-32/9/33, on PIot No. 33, situated in Survey^{No. 7418.} East Marredpally, Secunderabad, Telangana^{State, pursuant to G.O.Ms.No'609} Revenue (Registration-l) Dept., dated^{18-08-2004as illegal, arbitraryand against} the provisions of law, and declare G.O.lr/s.^{No. 609 RevenueRevenue} (Registration -l) Dept., dated 18-08-2004 as illegal, arbitrary^{and againstthe} provisions of law, or in the alternative direct the First Respondent^{to de-notifythe} Lands in so far as Survey No.^{7418situatedat East Marredpally,Secunderabad} from the impugned G.O.Ms.^{No. 609 Revenue (Registration-'1} )^{Dept.. dated 18-}

¶16

08-2004 and Consequently direct the Third Respondent .c receive,^{register and} release the Sale Deed executed in favor of the Petitiorr :r herein,^{in respect} of Flat No. 3, in the Second FIoor on the Southern Side, r :remises bearing^No. 10-3-3219133, on Plot No. 33, situated in Survey No.^{.1 '8,} East It/arredpally, Secu nderabad, Telangana State.

¶17

lA NO:^'l OF 2018

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in tlr - circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High C^)L rt may be^pleased to direct the Third Respondent to receive, register and^{'''l:ase the Sale Deed} executed in favor Petitioner herein, in respect of Flat No 3ⁱⁿ the Second^Floor on thr:'Southern Side, in^premises bearing No.^'l 0-3-3.,^/g/:13, on^{Plot No.} 33, situated in No. 74l8, East Marredpally, Secunderabad,^{Tt: ir rqana} State,^pending disposal of the present Writ Petition.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BAPI RAJU NANDURI

¶20

Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR STAMPS & REC ISTRATION

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

-Eq7

¶23

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

¶24

WRIT PETITION No.2572 of 2OL8 .

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for the respondents and pemsed the material on record.

¶27

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at the time of admission, this Court granted interim order on 30.01.2O18, directing the Registering Authorities to receive and register the document presented by the petitioner if it is otherwise found to be in compliance with the requirements of the Registration Act, 1908, and the Indian Star-np Act, 1899.

¶28

Today, when the matter is taken up for hcaring, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the interim order passed by this Court on 30.01.20 18, the Registering Authorities have registered the subject document

Learned Counsel for both sides sub nits that the connected matter in W.P.No.19106 of 2O1 .r hled by the State Government against the order in t..lC.No.167 of 1997 passecl by the Special Court under rc A.P. Land was Grabbing (Prohibition) Act, 19a2, Hy< r:'abad, dismissed by the Division Bench of tl^jr, Court on 28.O5.2025

¶33

In view of the submissions made by bot r sides ancl in view ol the dismissal of W.P.No.19106 (,f 2010 on 28.05.2025. the interim order passed by lis Court in I.A.No.1 of 2018 in W.P.No.2572 of 2OlB datcd 30.01.2018 is madc absolute. Accord ng1y, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶34

It is madc clear that mere registr rtion of the document does not confer title on the sul lt ct property and it is also made clear that this order w uld not have any bearing on all those matters where titlc^/tights of the parties are pending before the authoriti :r; either in revision/appeals lbr adjudication and in a: y other case this order also does not preclude the partie: n asserting

¶35

¶36

,-:-----

¶37

./.

¶38

their rights before a competent Court of law. There shall

¶39

be no order as to costs.

¶40

7 Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ

¶41

petition sha,ll stand closed.

¶42

/. L. LAKSHMI^BABU PUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

t of Revenue,^StamPs

¶47

1 The Princioal Secretary,^{To GovernmentDepart} inJ n"giitirtion,^{Secreiariat. Hyderabad, State of} Telangana

¶48

2 The District^{Registrarof Stampsand Assurance' Nampally' Hyderabad'} TheSub-RegistrarofStar.npsandAssurance(lvlarr-edpally),Bolvenpally' Hyderabad

¶49

4 One CC to SRI^{BAPI RAJUNANDURI,Advocate IOPUCI} 5 TwoCCstoGPFoRSTATVIPS&REGISTRAT|ON,HighCourtfortheState of Telangana at^HYderabad [OUTI

¶50

6 Two CD CoPies BSR GJPw

HIGH COURT

DATED:1UAT12025

ORDER

WP.No.2572 of 2018

.,,.,,.,.--i<br>,/,4
o)t.,
-.r l!
'i 0[TM
.i"./'
<br>.,rr..
. ,-.

¶56

DISPOSING OF,THE WRIT PETITION,

¶57

WITHOUT COSTS

¶58

q
2,-t ,f
Io,vI

Smt. Parvathi Madhav Yejage, v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Parvathi Madhav Yejage, v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Salvaji Venkata Ramana Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Cheruku Sree Ram Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

The Vimalananda Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs State of Telangana

Sri Manoj Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Sri Jaipal Reddy Tankasala Vs State of Telangana

M/s. Gvns Toll Way Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Telangana