Dismissed¶29

Sri Manoj Kumar Gupta v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Telangana HC10 Jul 2025WP/16823/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition; liberty to file fresh writ petition; endorsement by counsel; dismissal as withdrawn without costs; refusal to receive and register sale deed; Sub-Registrar Rajendranagar; Stamps and Registration; open plot 145 sq. yds Survey No.10(Part) Sri Maruti Enclave Upparpally; Article 226 mandamus; Articles 14 and 21; Section 151 CPC applications (I.A. No.1 of 2022, I.A. No.1 of 2023); Manoj Kumar Gupta v. State of Telangana; Telangana High Court 2025.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn at the petitioner's request; liberty granted to file a fresh writ petition if any cause survives; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed. ¶29

Sri Manoj Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Telangana… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶29

Issue for consideration

Whether the action of Respondent No.4 (Sub-Registrar, Rajendranagar) in refusing to receive and register the petitioner's Sale Deed for open Plot No.19 (125 sq. yds) and Plot No.19/P (20 sq. yds), totally 145 sq. yds / 121.22 sq. mtrs in Survey No.10 (Part), Sri Maruti Enclave, Upparpally Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, was arbitrary and illegal, warranting a writ of mandamus directing receipt and registration of the deed.

¶17

Court's answer

Permission is granted to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition, learned counsel having sought such permission with liberty to file a fresh writ petition and made an endorsement to that effect.

¶28

Ratio / Principle

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition if any cause survives.

¶29

Key takeaways

There shall be no order as to costs.ratio¶29

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Petition No. 16823 of 2022 (High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad; K. Sarath, J.; 10-07-2025): Petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus against Respondent No.4 (Sub-Registrar, Rajendranagar) for refusing to receive and register a Sale Deed for open Plot No.19 (125 sq. yds) and Plot No.19/P (20 sq. yds), totalling 145 sq. yds / 121.22 sq. mtrs in Survey No.10 (Part), Sri Maruti Enclave, Upparpally Village, Ranga Reddy District, alleging violation of Articles 14 and 21. Learned counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw with liberty to file a fresh writ petition and made an endorsement to that effect. Held: writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition if any cause survives; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, closed. Interlocutory applications I.A. Nos. 1 of 2022 and 1 of 2023 under Section 151 CPC had sought interim directions for registration. No precedent discussed; no merits adjudicated.

¶1

[³³⁰² ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 16823 OF 2022

¶8

Between:

¶9

Sri Manoj Kumar Gupta, S/o.Yatindra^{Nath Gupta,Aged about} !?^year.s, Occ. Business, R/o. House No.5-8-287, Mahesh^{Nagar Colony,Nampally,} Hyderabad.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of Telangana, Represented by its^{Principal Secretary, Department} of Revenue, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad,^Telangana.

¶13

2 The Commissioner and lnspector General Of Registrations^{and Stamps,} Hyderabad, Telangana.

¶14

3 The District Registrar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana.

¶15

4 The Sub-Registrar, Rajendranagar, Ranga Reddy^{District, Telangana.}

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of^{lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^{High Courtmaybe} pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more^{particularly,} one in the^{nature of} Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents^{moreparticularlythe} Respondent No.4 in refusing to receive and^{register the Sale Deed presentedby} the Petitioner in respect of^property i.e. Open^{Plot bearingNo. 19, admeasuring} 125 Sq. Yds and Plot No. 19/P, admeasuring 20^{Sq.yds, totally admeasuring145} Sq.yds or 121.22 sq.mtrs in Survey No. 10^{(Part) situatedat Sri MarutiEnclave,} Upparpally Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal and^{Circle, Ranga Reddy District, T.S} as arbitrary, illegal and consequently and^violation of^{Articles14 and 21 of} Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the^{Respondent No. 4 to receive and}

¶18

¶19

lA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶20

Petition under section i s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondent No.4 to receive and register the document presented by the petitioner in respect of property i.e. open prot bearing no.'1 9, admeasuring 125 Sq. Yds and Plot no.19/p, admeasuring 20 Sq.yds, totally admeasuring .145 sq.yds or 121 .22 sq.mtrs in Survey.No. 1o(part) situated at sri Maruti Enclave, Upparpally Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, T.S., for registration and release the same.

¶21

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶22

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondent No.4 to receive and register the registered sare deed document presented by the petitioner in respect of property i.e. open prot bearing No. 1g, admeasuring 125 Sq. yds and plot No. 1 9/p, admeasuring 20 Sq.yds, totaily admeasuring 145 Sq.yds or 121.22 sq.mtrs in Survey No. .10 (part) situated at Sri Maruti Enclave, Upparpally Village, Rajendra Nagar Mandal and Circle, Ranga Reddy Diskict,, Telangana State.

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. L. B. KUMAR

¶24

Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR STAMPS AND REGTSTRATTON The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

¶26

WRIT PETITION No.16823 of 2022

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition and requested to gralt liberty to lile a fresh writ petition and made an endorsement to that effect.

¶29

Accordingly, permission is gralted as sought for. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrau,n granting liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition, if any cause survlves. I{owever, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶30