Disposed

Thallapalli Divya v. The State of Telangana, Home Department, rep. by its

Telangana HC15 Sept 2025WP/25284/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition alleging police harassment and arbitrary calling and detention of the petitioner and family at the police station. Court directed respondent police authorities not to interfere with the petitioner's personal liberty and right to life except in accordance with law.

What did the court decide?

Police directed not to interfere with petitioner's personal liberty and right to life except in strict accordance with law; no costs.

Thallapalli Divya Vs The State of Telangana, Home… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

I I { I :

13217 |

: I I I I I , I

I i I I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶7

IUONDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶8

PRESENT

¶9

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

¶10

WRIT PETITIO NNO:25284 OF 2016

¶11

Between:

¶12

Thalla.palli R/o. H.No.2-6-1 1Bl3/A, -Divya,^{Wo Thallapalli.} Jangaon Village anO'UfInJai,^prabhaker, -aged^{43 years,} d,arangal^Occ: Oistrict.^{Housewife.,- ' '-''}

¶13

AND

¶14

...PETITIONER

¶15

'I . The state of reranoana, Home Department, rep. by its, Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶16

Superintendent of police, Warangal. Waranqal District.

¶17

hspector of Police, Jangaon poliie Station,"Warangal District.

¶18

Sub lnspector of^potice, Jangaon police stition. wiiangii ijrfi"t.

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition under Articre 226 ot rhe constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particurarly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in harassing and torturing the petitioner and her famiry members without any cause by cafling to the porice station and detaining them in the porice station is highry arbitrary, bad and iilegar and pass such other order or orders as deem tit and proper.

¶21

l.A. NO: 1OF 2o16(WPMP. NO: 31219 0F 2016)

¶22

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 4 not to harass the petitioner and her family members. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI p. PRABHAKAR REDDY

¶23

Counsel for the Respondents: MR R. LAXMTKANTH REDDY, AGp FOR HOME

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

¶26

¶27

THE HONOURABI-E^SRI JUSTICE^{N. TI- KARAMJI}

¶28

WRIT P TITION No.252⁸⁴ of201;_

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

This writ petition is filed r.rnder Ardcle 226 <t Carstirution of India seeking the following relief/s:

¶31

"... to issue an order or direction more panicular\ ,ne Ln the natt re of Writ of Mandamus declaring the^actt, n of the respondents in harassing and tonuring the petition, r and her family memben without any cause by calling to he police sration and detaining them in the police station is highly arbitrary bad and illegal and pass such other order or orders as deem tit and proper...."

¶32

Fleard Mr.P.Prabhakar Reddy, Ieamed c(f rsel for^the petitioner and Mr.Rlaxmikanth Reddy, learr ed fusistant

¶33

Govemment Pleader for Home appearing for^{res: tndentNos.L} to 4.

¶34

Leamed counsel for the petitioner would r; Lbmit that, as the respondent police authorities have harassing -he^petitioner

¶35

by calting^{and detaining them in police station arbitrarily' this} petition is^{filed seeking appropriatedLection'}

¶36

4 Leamed^{Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home would} submit that^{the police authoritiesnever interferedwiththe} penonal life^{and liberryof the petitioner and the contention} raised are^{unfounded, hence,} Praycd^{for dismissal of the} Petrtlon.

¶37

5 I have pensed^{the materials on record'}

¶38

Flavrng^{regardto the assertive statement of the petitioner} in the affidavit^{and consideringthe limitation of the police even} during conducting^{criminal proceedings and the interim} dtection^{passed by this Court, the respondent police authorities} are directed^{not to interfere with the penonal liberry and right to} life of the^{petitioner's, save and excePt in strictaccordancewith}

¶39

Iaw.

¶40

7 \X/ith this direction,^{this writ petition is dispose1 of' There}

¶41

shall be^{no order as to costs'}

¶42

Miscellaneous^petitions, Petitions^{if any' shall str rd closed'}

¶43

sd/'A'SREtNYA:}'EFRRX /

¶44

¶45

The^{Secretary,Home}

¶46

//TRUE coPY/,

¶47

,E lTt6foFFtcER

¶48

Department'^{Secretariat, Stal( ofTelangana'}

¶49

i, l[ni$u[ffi''Jffiffiii:Fl-tl#ai4':'i t':3 .*,

¶50

O. fwo^{CCsto GP for Hom}

¶51

Two^{CD CoPies}

MMT MP

ur{

I /

HIGH COURT

DATED:1^510912025

ORDER

WP.No.25284^{ot 2016}

¶59

htlE
u.t
)
) f I
tt 3 B m ai<br>i
* *

¶60

DISPOSING^{OF THE WRIT PETITON} WITHOUT^COSTS

¶61

Thallapalli Divya v. The State of Telangana, Home Department, rep. by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thallapalli Divya v. The State of Telangana, Home Department, rep. by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Imtiyaz Husen Vs The State of Telangana

Ramdas Ratnam, Adilabad Dist Vs Prl Secy, Home Dept., Hyd and 3 Ot

Arigela Tirupati Swamy, Vs The State of Telangana

Tirmaiashetti Venkateswarlu Vs The State of Telangana

J.Anjamma Vs The State of Telangana

Pashupathi Nath Pala, Vs The State of Telangana