Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioners were absent and not interested in pursuing the matter. Misc applications stand closed. No costs.
Dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
[3300 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO:24344 OF 2019
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia prpying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the inaction of the 'r "r respondent. in acting upon the Lr. Rc. No.024lHPcr2o16 d1.16.12.2o16 issued by the 3.d respondent and issuing no objection certificate/essentia lity certificate in favour of the petitioners as being illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Ar1. 14 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the 1st respondent to forthwith act upon the said retter of the 3rd respondent.
IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filedin support of the petition,the High Courtmzry, be pleasedto direct the 1 st respondentto forthwithact uponthe Lr. Rc. lrlo.024/HPC/2016dt. 16.12.2016issued by the 3rd respondent, pending dispo:;al of the above writ petition.
Counselfor the Petitioners:SRI M. KARUNA SAGAR (NOT PRESENT) Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR MEDICALHEALTHFW
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
IIIRIT PETITION No.24344 of 2OL9
ORDER:
When the matter was taken up for hearingon 04.O3.2025, there was no representation' on behalf of petitioners, hence, it was directed to be listed on 03.03.2025 under the caption'for dismissal'.Even today, there is no representation on behalf ofpetitioners.
prosecution. No costs.
Consequently, miscellar-reous applicationspending,if
any, in the writ petition, shall stand closed.
j sD/- P.Ch.NAGABHUSHAMBA EPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC toSri M. KarunaSagar,Advocate[OPU 2. Two CCsto GP for MedicalHeaIth FamilYWelfare,HighCourt for the State of Telangana,at Hyderabad [OUT] 3. Two CDCoPies TJ GJP
r
/ t
I HIGH COURT I
DATED:0410312025
ORDER
WP.No.24344 of 2019
/-/ gt: S f4I
,.,)'
//,<br>//"'
io/) ),
L' 0 3 Jt]N ?[25 c
.!-
t +
o l:- ,: )A'i (lP€-e
<-:-----
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON. PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
9v
3 provisions across 2 enactments
A.P. M/s crescent Societies Society Registration for Education and Act
M.M. School of Nursing
Director of Medical Education, State of Telangana
Chairman, Hiqh Power Committee
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
