The petitioner challenged police harassment regarding a civil chit fund dispute pending before an arbitrator. The State indicated the case was closed as civil in nature. The court closed the writ petition with consent of counsel.
Writ petition closed with consent. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I Ii i I I II i
i J
I : Ii
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR-T'HE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD --"-' (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[32ss ]
MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FI'i-
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO 236150F 2025
Between:
V ^Siv-aVidya.-S^ag^ar,S/o t. flajg.nOr_aprasadAge 5O years, Occuoation propnetor of M/S Stvtes ru9 ..n.'No +z: s!i{itioi", ir;t,n".loi'ft""it["rij 8f, fll1{Tl,X,ilillffi !:%?IdoJ#.Eco,il''Hd'il.;2,i,i-*-,3t'i.."?fi
AND
...PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order/ direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the inaction of the Respondent No. 3 by harassing the petitioner and his famiry members and arso trying to setae the civir disputes i'e the said arbitration matter which is pending aEFoRE THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CHITS/ ARBITRATOR, ERRAGADDA, HYDERABAD SOUTH, bearing ABR. CF. NO 511 OF 2024 and 51O OF 2024 in his potice station which is illegal and improper. consequenfly direct the Respondents not to harass the petitioners and his famiry mernbers and not to ca, them to the porice station without proper notice and without any due process of law
lA NO:1oF 2025
Petition underSection 15'1CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled in support of the petition'the High Court may be pleased to direct theRespondent No 3 not to call and not to harassthe petitioners andhis family memberswithout proper notice and without any dueprocess of law and pending disposalof the above writ petition
Counselfor the Petitioner: SRI'V' DURGA NAGESWARA RAO
Counselfor the Respondent Nos' 1to3: GP FOR HOME
Counsel forthe RespondentNo'4:-
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
I I l I l
TIIE H ONOURABLE SRT JUSTICE N.V.SIIRAVAN KUIT{AR TPETITION No,236t 5of 202s
ORDER:
This Writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of respondent No.3 in harassing him and his family members for settling civil disputes, which is pending trefore the Deputy Registrar of Chits / Arbitrator, Erragadda, Hyderabad, South, bearing Arbitration CF.No.5l I and 510 of 2024.
).
memberswere made to sit in the PoiiceStation from 10:OOAM to 08:00PM onO2'O8'2O25'
6.Heardthelearnedcounselforthepetitionerandthe learned AssistantGovernment Pleadcrfor Home'
I i
,
I
Home, this Writ petition is closed with consent of both the
counsel
9 Accordingly, this Writ petition is closed. No order as to
costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending in this petition, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/-B. REKHA RANI STANT REGIS
//TRUE COPY//
To,
ECTION OFFICER 2. 1. Two CCs One CC to to SRl. GP FOR HOME ,High V. DURGANAGESWARA Court forthe RAO,Sta of Tete langana atIoPUCI Hyderabad [OUTI
BM LS Fk
HIGH COURT
DATED:11lOBl2O25
1ia!:
F
o rL<br>c.
+
I 2 | 'SEP 2[25
:l
O5'
ORDER
WP.No.23615of 2025
CLOSINGTHE WRIT PETITION WITHOUTCOSTS G.dlil {t- --c dqra'
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the police action in a civil dispute amounts to harassment requiring writ intervention.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to protection from police harassment.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sivaa Vidya Sagar
State of Telangana
Home Department
Station House Officer, Kushaiguda
N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
