Disposed

Mohammad Kaleem Pasha v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC11 Aug 2025WP/23536/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought details of all crimes registered against the petitioner across Telangana and production before appropriate magistrates. Counsel restricted relief to disposal of a pending representation; the court disposed of the petition directing respondents to decide it and furnish crime details within three weeks, without costs.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 31.07.2025 and furnish details of all crimes registered/pending against him within three weeks; no order as to costs.

Mohammad Kaleem Pasha Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

)

¶2

[3255 I

¶3

HIGHCOURTFORTHESTATFNETEI r6"Ti AII^..,. - r"^pd i" r " "oj^{lrtnHSflTAAr H yDE RABAD}

¶4

MONDAY, ,wo i'ol,.ifr THE I X.^T,rJ,trJ^ifr?y,8 .'

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

¶7

WRtT PETITION NO: 235360F 2025

¶8

Between:

¶9

s.mn##iil-:#Ff :p,i**:*,,+r+,,qrgSs

¶10

AND

¶11

...PET]TIONER

¶12

J!:.:,ffiil!?B[no1,"0 bv its principarsecretary, Department or Home,

¶13

32 The Director General of police, Telangana State, Lakdi_ka_pul, Hyderabad. lhe'sunerintendent^{of Police, Rajannasircira} District, siddipet-sircira Road,

¶14

4 The station House officer' sircira porice station, Rajanna sircira District,

¶15

.,.RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particula;, ;;; ,;;'rr,r* Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos. ;;r; ;'; ,",", furnishing detairs of crimesr registered against the petitioner as being iregar, arbitrary, discriminatory and viorative of Articres 14 and 210f the constitution of lndia and consequenry direct the Respondent No.2 to furnish the detairs of a, the crimes registered against the petitioner across the State and produce the Petitioner before the appropriate magistrates.

¶17

lA NO: 1 oF 2025

¶18

Petition^{under Section 151 CPC prayingthatin the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit^{fired in supportof the petition, the High court may be pleased} pleased to^{directthe RespondentNo.2 to furnish the details of all the crimes} registered^{against the Petitioner across the State pending disposalof the above} writ Petition

¶19

Counsel^{for the Petitioner: SRI SHAIKH MOHAMMED RIZWAN AKHTAR}

¶20

Counsel^{for the Respondents: ASST' GP FOR HOME}

¶21

The Court^{made the following: ORDER}

¶22

il il

¶23

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

¶24

WRIT PETITIONNo .23536 of 2025

¶25

ORDER

¶26

Hearcl learncd counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleaclcr for Home appearing for r.espondent Nos.1 to 4. With thc consent of the parties, this writ pctition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself .

¶27

2 This writ petition has been filed seeking the following prayer_

¶28

".Lo declnre tlle rcLion of tli Resportdent Nos.2 nnd 3 in not furnisling dttatLs of c.rirnes regtstered against the pelitioner as be[ng illegni, *rbttrary, dtscriuinntory nnd oiolntiae of Articles t+ and. it of"ttu

¶29

Consti_ttr tion o_f lndfu ttnd consequentty iirect tle Respondent No.2 to furnish^the'detniLs of I tlu cintes i.egistered agninst the petitioner ncross tlte S.t e nnd prodtLce the peiilioner bifore the approprrnte Magistrntes."

¶30

3 l'^ough rrarious grou^ds are raised in the wiit petition, rear,ed counser for the petitioner restricts his p'aye' seeking a direction to respondent arrthorities to dispose the petitioner,s lepresentation dated 37.07.2025, in a time bound period.

¶31

I I

¶32

Learned Assistar-rt^t Government pleader for Flome appearing for. responcients submits that if trre pctitioncr's representation dated 31.07.2025 is still pending for considcration; the respondent authorities may be directccl to dispose of th.e said rcpicsentation and pa.ss appropriate ordcrs in accordance r,vith law

¶33

¶34

In view^{of the submission made by learned counsel appearing on either} 5. sideandwithoutexpressinganyopiniononthemeritsofthecase,thiswrit petitionisclisposedofdirectingtherespondentauthoriticstodisposethe petitioner,s^{representationdated 31.07.2025 and furnish details of a1l the} crimes^{registered/ pendingagainstthe peIitioner,as expeditiouslyas possible,} preferably^{within a periodof three (03) weeks from the datc of receipt of copy} of this^{order and communicate the same to the petitioner'}

¶35

rs disposcd of. Miscellaneous 6. AccordinglY^{this writ} Petition

¶36

applications,^{if any pending,shallstanclclosed} No order as to costs.

¶37

SD/. T, SRINIVASA REDDY S TANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPYII

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Principal Secretary,^{Departmentof Home, Secretariat,} State of Telangana, HYderabad.

¶42

The Director General^{of Police, Telangana State, Lakdi-ka-pul,} Hyderabad.

¶43

The Superintendent^{of Police, Rajanna} Sircilla District, Siddipet-Sircilla Road, Sircilla.

¶44

The Station House^{Officer, Sircilla Police} Station, Rajanna Sircilla District.

¶45

One CC to SRI^{SHAIKH MOHAMMED RIZWAN AKHTAR,Advocate.} [OPUC]

¶46

Two CCs t; GP FOR^{HOME, High Court for the} State of^Telangana. [oUT]

¶47

Two CD Copies.

BSK

PVL

HIGH COURT

DATED:1^110812025

i He Ii rrl /at
Ct.
'r1
25 AIJE 26
a)
,:
-. ,, i
--

¶53

ORDER

¶54

WP.No.23536^{of 2025}

¶55

DISPOSING^{OF-THE WRIT PETITION} WITHOUT COSTS

Mohammad Kaleem Pasha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Kaleem Pasha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madhavaram Swathi Vs The Authorized Officer/ General Manager

Shaik Jan Bee @ Sowmya John Vs Union of India

V.S.R. Kalakshetram, Vs The District Collector

Pagidiala Narsimulu Vs The State of Telangana

Mohammed Adam Ali, Vs The State of Telangana

V. Siva Vidya Sagar Vs The State of Telangana