Disposed

Chendeti Narsi Yellaiah v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC5 Aug 2025WP/22945/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging police interference in a civil land dispute. The High Court directed the police not to interfere in pending civil suits between the parties, reserving the right to conduct investigations separately as per BNSS.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents Nos. 5 and 6 not to interfere in the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and respondent Nos. 7 to 10.

Chendeti Narsi Yellaiah Vs The State of Telangana — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³¹⁶⁸ I

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original J urisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 22945 OF 2025

¶8

Betwee n:

¶9

Chendeti Narsi Yellaiah, S/o. Yellaiah, Aged about 50 Years Occ ;Agricuiture, R/o. Kundaram Village, Lingalaghanpur Mandal, Jangaon District.

¶10

.....PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

'1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Depa(ment, Secretar at Bui.ding Secr^ta.iat. Hyderabad

¶13

The Director General of Police, Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶14

The Superintendent of Police, Jangoan, Jangoan District.

¶15

The Deputy Superrntendent of Police. Jangoan Division, Jangoan Distric[.

¶16

The Circie_ lnspector of Police, Raghunathapally Cii-cle. Rag h u natha pally, Ja ngoan Dist.rct

¶17

6 The Station House Officer. Lingalaghanpur Pclrce Station. Jangoan District.

¶18

Bathula Anjaneyulu, S/o. Gattaiah. Aged about 35 Years, Occ Agriculture. RJo. Kundai-anr \liilage, Llrrga laghanpr-r r Nlanrla l. J:rngaon District^-

¶19

Bathuia Prasad S/o. Gattaiah. Aged about 30 Years, Occ:Agrrculture, Ro. Kundaram Village. Lingalaghanpur l\landal, Jangaon District.

¶20

Bathula Galtaiah S/o. Aga ah, Aged about 60 Years, Occ Agrrculture, R/o. Kundaram Village, Lingalaghanpur ivlandal, Jangaon District.

¶21

Bathula Yadamma, W/o. Gattaiah, Aged about 55 Years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Kundaram Village, Lingalaghanpur [,4andal, Jangaon Districl

¶22

.....RESPONDENTS

¶23

Petition Under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of

¶24

Itlandamus declarrng^{lhe actronof the RespondentNos'5 and 6 in interferinginto} the^{peacefullife and liberty and agricultural operallonsol the Petitioner and also} interfering lnlo^{civil dir;putesbetween the Petitioner and RespondentNos'7 to 10} and calling the^{Petitionerand his family members lo the PolceStationand} threatening to^{hando;er the agriculture land of the Petitioner to an extent of} Ac.5.2O Gts rn Survey^{No 633/C'which is situated at KundaramVillage'} Lingalaghanpur^{Nrlandal, Jangaon Districtduring the pendencyof civrl suit through} video.S,No,462of2).024ando.S,No,33oof2a2SonthefileofHonourable Prrncipal i Additional^{JuniorCivil Judge. at Jangoanisillegal' arbitrary'} unconstitutional^{andr,'iolationof Artrcles 14, 15' 21 ancl300-Aof Constitution of} lndia and also^{violattonof Prrnciplesof Natural Justice and consequentlydirect} theRespondentNos.5and6nottointerfereintothepeaCefUllifeandlibertyand not to interfere into civil^{disputes between the Peiitioner and Respondent Nos.7 to} 1O and not to threaten^{lo handoverthe land to an extenlof Ac.5.20 Gts in Survey} No,633iC'whichisSitUatedatKundaramVillage,LingaIaghanpur[/andal, Jangaon District^{lo thtl Respondent Nos Z to 10 during the pendencyof civil suits} lhrough vide O.S.Nc.462^{ol2024 and O S.No 33O af 2O2S on the file of} Honourable Additiona^{JuniorcrvilJudge,at Jangoan betweenthe Petitionerand} lhe Respondent Nos.l'^{lo 10}

¶25

l.A.NO:'l OF 2O2s

¶26

Petition Under^{13ection151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit fi ed in^{s;Lrpport of the peiition, the FlighCourt may be pleasedto} clirect lhe Responcienl^{Nos.5 and 6 not to interjereintc the peacefui life and} liberly and not to^{rnterfereinto civil disputes belween the Petitionerand} ResponcientNos.TtolOandnottothreatentohandoverthelandtoanextentof Ac.5.20 Gts in Survey^{No 633/C, which is situatedat KundaramViliage'} Lingalaghanpur^{[,4andal,Jangaon District to the RespondentNos T to 10 during} lhe pendency of^{civil suits through vide 0 S'No 462 of 2A24and 0 S No 330 of} 2025 on the file^{of Hcn'ble Additional Junior civil Judge, at 3angoan between the} Petrtioner and^{the Respondent Nos.7 to 10 pending disposal of the writ petition'}

¶27

Counsel for the^{Petit oner : SRI RAPOLUBHASKAR}

¶28

Counse.l for the Respondent^{Nos.1 to 6 : SRI LAKSHMIKANTH'AGP FOR} HOME

¶29

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.7 to^{10 :} '

¶30

The Court made the following ORDER

¶31

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE^{K. LAKSHMAN} WIRIT PETITION No. 22945 of 2025

¶32

ORDER:

¶33

I Iearrl learned counsel for the^{petitioncrand} Sli LakstrrrrikanLh. leartted Assistant Covenrrtlcnt^Pleaderlor Horne appearing fbr respondent^{Nos.1to 6}

¶34

This Writ Petition is llled to dcclare thc^{actrorl ol} lespondent Nos-5 and^(r ln interfeling^{r,vitl.r the peaccfullife,} liber1y, and agricultural operations ol^{the pctitioner, atrd in} intertering in thc civil disputes betu'een the^{petitioner and} respondent Nos.7 to 10 without following^{due process of law, as} itlegal,

¶35

j Whcreas. the learned Assistant Goverumeul^{Pleader lor} I.lome, on rnstructions. 'vould submit^{that respondent No.7 has} lodged a cornplaint ctated 03.06.2025^{against the petitioner,} atleging that thc petitioner trespassed^{into his Iand, rvhich} amounts to crirninal trespass. On^{receipt of the said cornplaint,} rcspondcnt No.(r had ttrade att er-rtry^{in tlle Gencral Diary'Upon} cnquir-r,, hc folrnd that there are civil^{disputesbetr,r'ecn the} petitioner and respondent Nos.7 to 10.^Trvo civil^{suits, vide} O.S.Nos.462 o1: 7024^{and 330 of 2025, arc pending.Ther.cfore,}

¶36

¶37

he has closed the said compiaint on 06.06.2025, treating it as civil in nature.

¶38

A perusal of the record reveals that respondent No.l0 has filed a suit in O.S.No.462 of 2024, on the flle of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Jangaon, against the petitioncr fbr perpetual injunction, ancl the same is pending. Therc are no interim orders in the said suit. The petirioner has tlled a suit in O.S.No.330 ol 2025, on the fllc of Principal/Additional junior Civil Judgc, Jangaon, against responcleut Nos.7 to 9 for pcrmancnt rnjLrnctiou. The said suit is also pending, and no intenrn orc.lers liave been passed ti ll date.

¶39

In the light of aforesaid discussion. tliis Writ pe rition is disposed of, directing respondent Nos.5 and 6 not to interfere in the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and responclent Nos.7 to 10. However, tliis order. will not preclucle respondent Nos.5 and 6 from conducting enquiry/investigation, in the event of receipt of any complaint against the petitioncr anrl responde nt Nos.7 to 10, stnctly in accordance r,v itl'r the procedure laicl dor.vn under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. There shail be no order as to costs.

¶40

¶41

¶42

Miscellaneous applications, iI any pending, shall stand

¶43

c Iosed

¶44

SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTHY /flE UTY REGISTRAR ECTION OFFICER {")^t

¶45

//TRUE COPY//

¶46

To '1. The Principal Secretary, Home Depadment, Secret ariat Build ing, Secretarrat, State of Te anqa na at Hyderabad

¶47

The Director Gerreral of Police, Telangana, Hyderabad

¶48

3 The Superir:tendent of Police, Jangoan, Jangoan District.

¶49

The Deputy SLrperintendent of Police, Jangoan Division. Jangoan District.

¶50

The Circle lnsper:tor of Police, Raghunathapally Circle, Raghunathapally, Jangoan Distr ct

¶51

6 The Station Hou:;e Officer, Lingalaghanpur^police Station,,Jangoan District

¶52

7 Two CCs to GP t:OR HOit/E, High Court for the State of Telanlana at Hyderabad [OU--]

¶53

8 One CC to SRI FAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate tOpUCl

¶54

Two CD Copies

GJP

HIGH COURT

DATED:0510812025

ORDER

R THE S l4 ,}6
(
(n
)J-)
1E AUE zIE z
a
',2?
t {+
F,trcHr lt

¶62

WP.No.22945^{of 2025}

¶63

DISPOSING^{OF THE W.P}

¶64

WITHOUT^COSTS.

¶65

--rbpd Q9' bn a(

Chendeti Narsi Yellaiah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chendeti Narsi Yellaiah v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Bandi Sanjay Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Konatham Sathi Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Kesava Vayunandana Reddy Yella Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

T. Manohar Vishnoi Vs The State of Telangana

Marupaka Anjaiah, Vs The State of Telangana

Pathi Chandrasekhar Vs The State of Telangana