Dismissed

M/s.Csk Realtors Limited v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC6 Aug 2025WP/22259/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandate declaring the State's non-consideration of a regularization application illegal. The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one, which the Court granted, leading to the dismissal of the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission was accorded to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. No order as to costs.

M/s.Csk Realtors Limited Vs State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

[³¹⁶⁸¹

¶3

IN THE HIGH^{COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original^{Jurisdiction)}

¶4

WEDNESDAY,THE^{SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST} . -TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEK.LAKSHMAN} WRIT^{PETITIONNO:.2225I oF 2025}

¶7

Between:

¶8

M/s.CSK^{Realtors Lirnited, Havingoffice at No 5-9-30/1/17'Ground Floor'} Palace colony,^{Lrx"'riiir"Hb"i] eii"t't"'u'01, Hvderabad' rep' bv its Direcdor} Mr.Rakshith^{nggarwatl"'at'"5f'.5rI"Sr*.f'"f.unijrAoanrval'aged about 30} vears. occ.^{BusineSs' ?;'Fr'i'r'ro +or'' U'S'Residency'Palace colony'} ilash6erbagh,^HYderabad'

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

State of^{Telangana,rep by its Principal Secretary RevenueDepartment'} Secretariat,^HYderabad' .

¶12

ii; Di;iti,i^{C6llector, Hvderabad District .} - 3. The Revenue^{oivisioiai'dEiEi-Hyo} f"tl"a.Division^{Hvderabad District'} ;. ffi i;;;iil;;,^{sr,iiip"t Mandai, Hvderabad District'}

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition^{under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praylngthat in the} circumstances^{statedin the affidavit filedtherewith'the High Courtmay be} pleased to issue^{a writ, orderor direction more particularlyonein the nature of} Writ of mandamus^{declaringthe actionof the respondentsin not consideringthe} LRS application^{of the petitioner dated 26'03'2022 made for regularizationof its} possession and^{enjoyment over house propertybearing municipalNo'8-2-} 686/13,^{admeasuring935 Sq' Yards' part old Sy'No'129. correspondingto New} Sy.No.403^{of Shaikpet, situated at Road No'1 2' Banjarahills'Hyderabad ' as} illegal, arbitrary,^{unjust, unconstitutional' violation of principlesof natural justice} and also^{in violationof Articles14' 1g' 21 and 300-4 of the Constitutionof lndia} and contrary^{toG.O'Ms No 59Revenue(Assignment-l)Department} dated.30.12.2014'^{and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere or} dispossess^{the petitionerfrom subject property'without following due procedure} as contemPlated^{under law'}

¶15

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶16

Petition under section r 5'1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondents not to dispossess or interfere in any manner whatsoever with peacefur possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over house property bearing municipal No.8-2-686/13, admeasuring 93S Sq. yards, part old sy.No-129 corresponding to New sy.No.403 of shaikpet, situated at Road No.12, Banjarahills, Hyderabad. without foflowing due procedure contemprated under law, pending disposal of the writ petition

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. IMAD SHAREEF REp SRI MOHD MOIN AHMED QUADRI

¶18

Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR REVENUE

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICE K' LAKSHMAN}

¶21

WRIT PETITI^{ON No.22259 oF 20,25}

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

Mr.ImadShareef,learnedcounselrepresentingMr.Mohd.Moin Ahmed Quadri,^{learned counselfor the petitionerseekspermissionof} this Court^{to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a liberty to file} a fresh^{Writ Petition' He has made an endorsementto the said effect} in the^bundle.

¶24

Permission^{is accorded'}

¶25

Granting^{liberty as sought, this Writ Petition is dismissedas} withdrawn.^{There sha1l be no order as to costs}

¶26

As a sequel,^{the miscellaneouspetitions' if any' pendingin the}

¶27

¶28

Writ Petition^{shail stand closed'}

¶29

SD/. B^{. REKHA RANI} A ISTANT^REGTST

¶30

//TRUE^COPY//

¶31

SECTION^OFFICER

¶32

te [oPUCl the te of^Telang ana at To,i ff: 33Ji"'3i Y8FRY"?N'# H"? 3yfl'':l' Hvderabad [OUT]

¶33

Two^{CD CoPies} BM GJP

\ I

HIGH COURT

DATED:061081202s

//: ,.i, '--<br>? 5 sfp iur
.---..+- ^'

¶39

ORDER

¶40

WP.No.22259 of zOZs

¶41

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶42

<br>cb q

M/s.Csk Realtors Limited v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Csk Realtors Limited v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T. Manohar Vishnoi Vs The State of Telangana

Marupaka Anjaiah, Vs The State of Telangana

Pathi Chandrasekhar Vs The State of Telangana

In the matter of M/s. Ranka Cables Limited(in liqn) Vs No Respondent

In the matter of M/s. Monarch Pipes Limited(in liqn) Vs No Respondent

Smt. Bolle Manjusri Vs The State of Telangana