The High Court of Telangana permitted the withdrawal of a Writ Petition challenging the threat to demolish property under the RFCTLARR Act, 2013, and consequently dismissed the petition as withdrawn without costs.
Permission to withdraw the Writ Petition was accorded; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I I I
[321e1
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD islecialOriginalJurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THETWENWSECOND DAY OF JULY . ---TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVIDEVI
WRIT PETITIONNO: 20959oF 2025
Between:
oiio "niffoli : 1'J TI: n:"ifl?:H:i'r}e, ffiJ""ll iStYt:lU:/"Jl]*B "3"'; NagarkumoolDistrict.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
PetitionunderArticle226 of lhe Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled therewith'the High Court may be pleased to
(i). issue an approprialeWrit,Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamusdec{aringthe act-lon of the respondentsin threateningto demolish thepetitioner's property bearingH-No 5-7'situatedat Old BusStand' AmrabadVillagewithoutissuingnotice,withoutinitiatingacquisitionproceedings
I II I I Ii i I I I I 5i i : i : t ],
under the RFCTLARR Act, 2013, and without due process of law, as arbitrary, illegal, and viorative of Articres 14,21 , and 300-A of the constitution of rndia.
(ii) consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner,s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property except in accordance with law, particularly after folowing due process under the RFCTLARR Act, 2013.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondents not to demorish the H.No.5-7, situated at ord Bus Stand, Amrabad Village, Nagar Kurnool District pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G.CHANDRASEKHAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.i, 3 & 4: Gp FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ
RURAL DEV
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.S to 7: SRI K.PRADEEP REDDY,
SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT
The Court made the following: ORDER
I l I I i I I I I
\ \
TIIE HON'BLE SMT. JI'STICE T. MADTIAVI DEVI WRTT PEIITION No.2O959 of2O2s
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of
this Court to withdraw this Writ petition.
withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ
petition, shall stand closed.
SD/. B. REKHA RANI S TANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
5 Two CD Copies BSR GJP ?r
I I i j I l
HIGH COURT
DATED:2210712025
ORDER
WP.No.20959 of 2025
,t: .. i.., ' '<br>'.-,.'"
2O SEP zUS ?,':
} .'
: < .! ,/ ./
i) :'\L : ,r'
--i.
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS WITHDRAWN,
WITHOUT COSTS ls )'r" 1r!
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to relief against the proposed demolition of property pending acquisition proceedings.
Whether the Writ Petition should proceed to be decided on merits or be disposed of by withdrawal.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Resident/Owner of H.No. 5-7, Amrabad Village
Secretary, Panchayat Raj
State of Telangana
District Collector, Nagarkurnool
District Panchayat Officer, Nagarkurnool
Gram Panchayat, Amrabad
T.Madha Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
