Petitioner sought writ of mandamus against a co-operative society refusing him membership and No Objection Certificate to sell land. Court directed respondent society to consider his representation for membership and subsequently issue NOC for sale within two months; petition disposed of without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1321s 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 17166 OF 2025
Between:
Addulla Krishna Reddy, S/o Late Addulla NarasimhaReddy. Aged about 56 years, Occ. Business. Fl/o H.No.B-6-678/1 , Sri Balaji Nagar, Karmanghat Village. Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District-500070, Telangana
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution oflndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court may be pleased topleased to issue, writ. order or direction especially one in the Nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of tnerespondent No.3 in refusing to admit thepetitioner as member in the society aswell as to give No Objectionto sell the property to the 3rd party i.e. open land bearingplot No.329, admeasuring 500sq. yards equivalent to 418.05 sq. meters in Sy.No.60 (part), Ward No.6. BlockNo.7' situated at Agriculture Colony, KarmanghatVillage. Saroornagar Revenue Mandal. Ranga Reddy District under letter dt.06-06-2025 ol thepetitioneris illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unreasonable, violative of Article300-4 ofthe Constitution of lndia and consequentlydirect therespondents to enrol the petitioner as member of the 3rd respondent society and issue No Objectionto sell the open land bearingplot No.329, admeasuring500 sq. yards equivalentto
48.05 sq. meters in Sy.No.60 (part), Ward No.6, Block No.7, situatedat Agriculture Colony, Karmanghat Village, Saroornagar Revenue Mandal,Ranga Reddy District belongs to thepetitioner in favour of the 3rdparty i.e.Kallu Naresh Reddy, S/o K. Hanumanmth Reddy or any otherperson in theinterestof justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondents to enroll thepetitioner as member of the 3rdrespondent society and issue No Objection to sell the open land bearingplot No.329, admeasuring 500 sq.yards equivalent to 48.05 sq. meters in Sy.No,60(part), Ward No.6, Block No.7, situated at Agriculture Colony, Karmanghat Village, Saroornagar Revenue Mandal, Ranga Reddy District belongs to thepetitionerin favour of the 31dparty i.e. Kallu.Naresh Reddy, S/o K. Hanumanmth Reddy or any other person in the interest ofjustice. pending disposal of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI Y.BALA MURALI
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR COOPERATION
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 :
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No.17165 OF 2025
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in refusing to admit the petitioner as member in the society as well as to give No Objection to sell the property to the 3.a party i.e., open land bearirrg plot No.329, admeasuring 50O sq.yards equivalent to 418.05 sq.meters in Sy.No.6O (part), ward No.6, Block No.7, situated at Agriculture colony, Karmanghat Village, Saroornagar Reveni-ie Mandal, Ranga Reddy District under letter dt.06.06.2025 of,the petitioner, as illegal and arbitrary and for a consequential direction to the respondents to enroll the petitioner as member of 3.d respondent society and issue No Objection Certihcate to sell the open land stated above in favour of 3'd parly.
2
consequent to r.r,hich, the vendor has sold the property by way of registered sale deed in favour of the petitioner. It is further stated that the petitioner had made a representation asking the 3.d respondent society to admit him as a member and also give him No Objection Certificate for sale of his property. Learned counsel placed reliance on the order passed by this Court in W.p.No.1g947 of 2025 d,ated, O3.O7.2025, whErein in similar circumstances, this Court has directed the respondent No.3 therein to consider the representation of the petitioner therein for issuance of membership and also No Objection Certihcate.
Petition, shall stand closed
SD/-A.V.S.PRASAD EPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPYII
SECTION OFFICER
To,
BSK
HIGH COURT
DATED:2210712025
1rrL Slrlf
€
( c o^,
+
o
g (j'
2I JUL 2U5 (
\
2r.Sp.irc '.ec
ORDER
WP.No.17166 of 2025
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
\
ar,
x
A
t
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the society's refusal to admit the petitioner as member and issue No Objection Certificate for sale was illegal and arbitrary.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Addulla Krishna Reddy
The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Co-operative Societies Department
The District Collector, Ranga Reddy
Telangana State Agricultural Department Employees Co-operative House Building Society Ltd
T.Madhavi Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
