P. Manohar, Vs The Government of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

P. Manohar, Vs The Government of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

[³³⁸³ I

I I I I i I t, I I I I

IN THE HIGH^{COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYOERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

IVONDAY,THE FIRST^{DAY OF SEPTEI,IBER} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY FIVE}

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY}

WRIT PETITION^N O:^{1595 0F 2015}

Between:

P. [,4anohar,^{Sio Durgaiah,} Aged about 55^{years,H.No.5-1-2l2/G'} Shanthinagar,^{SangareddY, Me} dak District

...PETITIONER

AND

1 The Government^{of Telangana,Rep by its PrincipalSecretary'Municipal} ni rl"'itt*ii""^{rnO uroan o""ue[p,"ntD'epartment'Secretariat'Hyderabad'}

The District Collector, District Collector,^{Medak District Sanga Reddy}

2 The District Collector, District Collector,^{Medak District Sanga Reddy} 3 lvlunicioal Council,^{Sangareddy IVlunicipality, Rep by its Commissioner} Sangaieddy,^{MedakDistrict.}

4 The Commissioner,^{Sangareddylvlunicipality,Sangareddy' Medak District'}

...RESPONDENTS

PetitionunderArticle226oftheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances^{stated in the affidavit filedtherewith'the High Court may be} pleased to issue a^{writ,orderor direction more particularly one in the nature of} writofmandamustodeclarethenoticeNo.lE/2150/2012-13,dated21-01-2015, issued by the^{4th respondentas iltegal, arbitrary colorable exercise of powers'} violative of^{principlesof NaturalJustice, contrary to the extension orders dated} 05-08-2014^{issuedby the Chairpersonand contrary to the provisionsof} MunicipalitiesActl965andRulesmadetherein,andconsequentlydirectthe respondents to^{continue the contractawardedto the petitioner in pursuance of} orders issued by^{the chairpersonof 2ndrespondentMunicipalitydated 05-08-} 2014.

l.A. NO: 1OF 201s(WPMP.^{NO:2119OF 2015)}

I

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circr .nstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court ray be pleased to suspend the operation of Notice No. 1 E/21s0l20 1I3, dated r1-0.1 -2015, issued by the 4th respondent, pending disposal of the above writ peti.i )n

l.A. NO: 2OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 2120 0F 20151

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the crrc- nstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court r ray be pleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to continue the contract awarrJ :d to the petitioner in pursuance of order dated 05-08-2014 in preamble No. 931 tr ending disposal of the Writ petition

I.A. NO: 3 OF 2015 (WPMP. N O:4725 OF 2015)

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the cir,rr.r nstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High courr r ay be pleased to receive addl. affidavit and addl. documents i.e. (1) copy of Rr:r olutron No. g/164, dt.31- 01-2015 (2) copy Notice Dl.21-1 0- 2013 (3) copy of trl.r ce dt.10-06- 20.14 (4) Explanation dt.23-o6-2014 (5) water Testing report dt.2€i-c i- 2c14 (6) water Testing report dt.26-05 -2014 (r) Drinking water suppry pran. t 3) Representation dl 10 02.2015, (9) Tax invoice cum chailans (9) chemicar pLrrr rase biil dt.31-0.r - 2015, (10) Meeting of 3rd respondent hetd on 3'1-10-it( 4 and preamble NO.9/69to the file of the W.p.i595/2015

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI VANAM VISHWANATHAM

Counsel for the Respondent No..t: Gp FOR MCPL ADMN-URtI \N DEV

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Gp FOR REVENUE

Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 3& 4: p. KRISHNA REDDY.{t C FOR MC,TELANGANA)

The Court made the following: ORDER

_=-Fry

//

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^{LAXMINARAYANA ALISHETTY} WRIT PETITION No.1595^{of 2015}

ORDER:

When the matter is^{taken up for} hearing,

learned Counsel for^{the petitionerwould submit that the cause in} the Writ Petition does not^{survive for adjudication and the same} has become infructuous.

2 Recording the aforesaid^{submissionof the learned counsel,} the Writ Petition is^{dismissedas infructuous.Thereshall be no}

order as to costs

.)a Miscellaneous^{petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed}

.A SREENIVASA REDDY ISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

I

'l . One CC to SRL VANAM VISHWANATHAIvI Advocate IOPUCI

One CC to SRl. P. KRISHNA REDDY, (SC FOR MC,TELANGANA) Advocate loPUCl

Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN-URBAN DEV (TG) ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

I

Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE (TG) ,High Court for the State of Telangana touTl

Two CD Copies

PVL

i \

HIGH COURT

DATED:01 10912025

ORDER

WP.No.1595 of 2015

_:.
./
(
1 Il 3 i
L [H
r_i)

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

WITHOUT COSTS

b