A writ petition seeking action on a school recognition application and suspension of two official proceedings was withdrawn by counsel with an endorsement seeking liberty to file a fresh petition. The court granted liberty and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t3168I
ArHYD ERABAD H' GH c o u Rr .. i Jx5,'"l6L'n,?5 l.,:3}f#$
WEDNESDAY,THE NINTHDAYOI-J-.UIY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEK'LAKSHMAN
WRITPETITION NO:19598OF2025
'"*"ii.,.Un=*rv qluq?Ion'lSocietv' represe-nted bv;t';Tl3:t%:"ir?i35f,,: li'iJti'frt%1N.- Madhusudhan'aged abo-ut Sithafalmandi's""u#"i'u'ilt'"r''ig"n'State - 500061'
...PETITIONER
AND
Petitionunder Article226 of lhe Constitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith'the High Court may be pleased to issuea writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature writ of mandamusdeclare the in actionof the Respondents2 to 5 are not initiating the actionsagainst the recognition application for running the school and representationmade by the petitioner dated 10 06'2025todirect the RespondentsNos.2 to 4 hereinto consider the recognitionfor schoolby grantingpermissiontorun the school consequently tosuspendthe impugnedproceedings bearingNo Rc No.3366tD1t2O25dt'2406'2O25and Rc.No.556iURS/MSRD/2025dated25 06'2025'
IA NO :1oF 2025
7
petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit firecl in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the operation of the impugned proceedings bearing Nos. Rc No 3366/D'1/2025 dr.24.06.2025 and Rc.No.556/URS/MSRD/2025 dated 25 06 '2025 issued by the 4th and 5th Respondents herein ti, pending disposar of the main case.
Counset for the petitioner: SRI DANTU VENKATA RAMANA SARMA Counset for the Respondents: Gp FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER
tI
THEHON'BLESRI JUSTICE K' LAKSHMAN of 2025 WRITPETITI ONNo. 19598
ORDER:
Sri D VRamana Satma'learnedcounsclfor pettttoner seekspermission'ofthis Couft to withdraw the present Writ Petitionwith tiberly to the petitioner tofile a ftesh Writ Petrtton. Hehas also rnade an endorsementon the bundleto the saideffect'
to costs
Miscellaneousapplications,ifanypending,shallstand
closed
REENIVASA REDDY S TANTREGISTRAR-
//TRUECOPYI/ ECTIONOFFICER
To, 1. OneCC to SRIDANTU VENKATA RAMANA SARNI A dvocate iOPUCI gh Courtfor the State of EDucA,oN'Hi ' Tgf:;,'&ffsSf,fi&'r?L
3 Two CDCoPies BSR PVL
)
I I I I i I I i I
HIGH COURT
DATED:09 t}tt2}2s
ORDER
/,' , r'. f- S i, r( \i.
2 0 sFP 2025
*
i) .: .l
:.,'
WP.No.19598 of 2O2S
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WTHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS
/
4/5
{//
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Society represented by N. Madhusudhan
Principal Secretary (School Education), State of Telangana
Commissioner and Director of School Education
Regional Joint Director of School Education, Hyderabad District
District Educational Officer, Hyderabad District
Deputy Educational Officer, Musheerabad Zone, Hyderabad
K Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
