Writ petition challenging allocation of 0.92 acres of Autonagar Industrial Park land for a graveyard was dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on multiple dates when the matter was listed for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132521
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 19421 OF 2017
Between:
Gopinath.C, S/o Rama Rao, aged 42 years, Occ business, Plot no.287, Phase-4, Vanasthalipuram, Hyderabad 500070.
...PETITIONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an Order, direction, Writ preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings bearing Lr.No.6B5/AMW/AN-H/09 dated 19.02.2009 on the file of 2nd Respondent pertaining to allocation of land to the extent of 0.92 acres for the purpose of graveyard which is adjacent to Residential area in Sy.No.32, Karmanghat (V), Saroor Nagar (M), Ranga Reddy Dist which belongs to Autonagar lndustrial Park, Hyderabad as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 23652 OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings hearing Lr.No.6B5/AMW/AN-H/09 dated 19.02.2009 on the file of 2nd Respondent pertaining to allocation of land to the extent cf 0.92
t
acres for thepurpose ofgraveyardwhichis adjacentto Residential areain Sy.No.32, Karmanghat(V), Saroornagar (M), Ranga Reddy Dist which belongs to Autonagar lndustrial Park, Hyderabadpendingdisposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRIPILLADA SATYANARAYAN(NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GPFORINDUSTRIES& COMMERCE Counsel for the RespondentNos.2 & 3: SRI L.PRABHAKARREDDY, SC FOR TSIIC
The Courl made the following: ORDER
1 I
HON,BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION No.1 9421 ot 2OL7
ORDER:
No representation is made on behalf of thepetitioner when the case is called on 07.01.2025. Thouqh the matteris listed under the caption "for dismissal" on 29.01.2025, thereis no representation on behalf of thepetitioner when thecase is called. Though the matter is listed under the caption"for dismissal" on 07.02.2025 again, there is norepresentationon behalf of thepetitioner when the caseis called.
As a sequel, the miscellaneouspetitions, if any,pending in the Writ Petition shall also stand closed.
SD/. A. SRINIVASAREDDY SISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
{fi-
I
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:0710212025
ORDER
WP.No.19421 of 2017
1HE s14 ,€
Jt ({(
D
I
2 t nnt 2y6 a
*
SpAT()r<br>
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTIONWITHOUT COSTS
q il-* ,rff{
1 issue framed by the court
Should the writ petition be dismissed for non-prosecution given repeated non-representation by the petitioner?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gopinath.C
State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Ministry of Commerce and Industries
Executive Director, Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation
Commissioner, Auto Nagar Industrial Park, Telangana State Industrial Infrastructure Corporation
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
