Writ petition challenging a Distrain Order issued under the A.P. Revenue Recovery Act was dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted the matter had become infructuous. No order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.
None granted; writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs and miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 fr I t I i ,:
[348e I
I
\
'+ ,*
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
,tt. t #,
TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FN/E
PRESENT
,,s *t
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 19074 OF 2fi)7
Between:
f
*1t
Smt. K.V. Lakshmi, Wo. Sri K.V. Narasimha Rao, Business, R/o. Plot No.303, West Maredpally, Secunderabad, Proprietor, M/s. Lakshmi Contructions
...PETITIONER
AND
rl *
...RESPONDENTS
:+ * I
*iii
t
,+ #
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the first respondent in issuing the Distrain Order dt.25-8-2007 in relation to the petitioners property Plot No. 155c, 156 E and F, Phase-ll, IDA Cherlapalli, R.R District, as illegal, arbitrary, withoutjurisdiction and contraryto theprovisions of A.P. Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 and set aside the same and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
l.A. NO: { OF 2007(WPMP. NO: 2a517 OF 2007)
'tF' I $
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstan@s sdated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may 5e pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the Distrain Order dater 25-8-2007 issued by the first Respondent.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI LINGAMPELLY RAVTNDER
h
counser for the Respondents'
:IiirHlt}ffil*,'"0.,
/ '+ t f I !
b
f
The Court made the following: ORDER
",;
I
b
a. t-'
I ft
t {r
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY rHE HoNouRiillE sRr JUSrrcE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
W.P.No.l9074 OF 2007
ORPER: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice p.Sam Koshy)
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.shravani, learned counser representing Mr.Lingampelly Ravinder, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has since become infructuous.
stands dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
'+ I { \
//TRUE COPYII
o,,,3?l-ftiX?ElSffH G
SECTION OFFICER
.{h
t. *i
To,
BBSK
BS
'r,r 'f *;
t
t
f {h,
HIGH COURT
t
f
&,
DATED t02l0gl2025
*+
5i
tk
ORDER
WP.No.19074 of2007
tJ t- Ir-r
Y
r) $3 Lit ru5
* *
,f) r!
ig;i:4 1'r-i-<br>
DISMISSING THEWRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
'; f +
',,,
*b
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Smt. K.V. Lakshmi
Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Nacharam, Ranga Reddy District
The Deputy Commissioner, Saroornagar Division, Ranga Reddy District
P. Sam Koshy
Suddala Chalapathi Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
