Dismissed

M/s. Word and Deed India, v. The Director General of Income Tax ( Exemptions).

Telangana HC1 Sept 2025WP/15725/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court adjudicated on three petitions involving the petitioner and income tax authorities concerning a garnishee notice and stay of tax collection. The court found the current writ petition infructuous and dismissed it.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous petitions closed. No order as to costs.

M/s. Word and Deed India, Vs The Director General of Income Tax… — Income Tax | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[^348e 1

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TE LANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

¶6

P TITION 572

¶7

Between:

¶8

M/s. Word and Deed lndia,.plot No.1, pedda Amberpet, Hayatnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Rep. by its Director tr/rs. t<.paO'mi;a iffi;i;;.

¶9

¶10

..PET|T|ONER

¶11

The Director General of . lncome Tax (Exemptions)., Ayakar Bhavan, plot No.'l 5, 2nd Floor, Laxmi Nagar District Cbntre, irlew fjehi-i f O OS2

¶12

The Director of lncome. Tax (Exemptions), Olympic Bhavan, L.B.Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶13

The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-lV, 7th Floor, lT Towers, AC Guards, Hyderabad.

¶14

Additional Director of lncome Tax, Olympic Bhavan, L.B.Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶15

t B:3#:'"853f;:,lr?[Jffi?::^{rax (Exemptions)' orvmpic Bhavan'L B stadium,}

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction or orders especially one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the garnishee notice dated 2g.ol.2oog issued by the sth respondent attaching the bank account of the petitioner with canara Bank, Hayatnagar Branch, Hyderabad pending the consideration of stay petition by the 1st respondent as being illegal, arbitrary and against the judgment of this Honbre Court and set aside the same.

¶18

A.N 1 0F 2009 PMP. NO:20645 2009

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the collection of disputed taxes of Rs. 1,68,37,468/- quantified as payable by the^petitioner for assessment year 2006-07 till the disposal of the stay petition pending before the 1st respondent and consequently direct the Sth respondent to withdraw the attachment of the petitioner's bank account with Canara Bank, Hayatnagar Branch, Hyderabad.

¶20

l.A. NO: 1 F 2013(WVMP . NO: 1183 OF 2013)

¶21

Between:

¶22

The Director General of lncome Tax (Exemptions)., Ayakar Bhavan, plot No.'l 5, 2nd Floor, Laxmi Nagar District Cilntre, New Eielhi-i 1 O 092

¶23

The Director of lncome Tax (Exemptions), Olympic Bhavan, L.B.Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶24

The Commissioenr of lncome Tax (Appeals)-lv, 7th Ftoor, lT Towers, AC Guards, Hyderabad.

¶25

Additionald Director of lncome Tax, Olympic Bhavan, L.B.Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶26

Deputy Director of lncome Tax (Exemptions), Olympic Bhavan, L.B.Stadium, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

¶27

...PETITIONERS

¶28

AND

¶29

M/s. Word and Deed lndia, Plot No.1,^pedda Amberpet, Hayatnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Rep. by its Director Mrs. K.pacimaja Thomai.

¶30

...RESPONDENT

¶31

Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to dismiss the Writ Petition and vacate the interim order granted in W.P.M.P.No.20645 of 2009, dated 17.OB.2OOg.

¶32

Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. PRABHAVATHI, REp. FOR

¶33

SRI A.V.RAGHU RAM

¶34

Counsel for the Respondents: SRI S.R.ASHOK The Court made the following: ORDER

tr-Tt

[t]

:ITi

9BDEB: Ger^{the Hon'ble Sri lustice P.sam Koshy)}

¶40

Ms. Prabhavathi, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of^{Mr. A.V.} Raghu Ram, learned counsel for the^petitioner, submits^{that since the} instant writ petition has become infructuous, they do^{not intend to pursue} the matter any further and, therefore,^{the writ petition maybe dismissed} as having become infructuous.

¶41

Recording the aforesaid submission^made by^{the learnedcounsel} appearing for the^petitioner, the writ^{petition stands dismissedas having} become infructuous.

¶42

As a sequel, miscellaneous^{petitions pending if any, shall stand} closed. However, there shall^{be nor order as to costs.}

¶43

SD/. K.BHAVANI^SWAMY REGIS

//TRUE COPY//

OFFICER

To,

.1 . ONE CC tO SRI A.V.RAGHU RAM, AdVOCAIE

¶48

One CC to SRI S.R.ASHOK,^{Advocate [OPUC]}

¶49

Two CD Copies

BS R o LS

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0110912025

t=i

WP.No.I5725 ol 2 0 0 rnt.i

¶55

IHE t 14
(
J.) (<br>l(J
L 1 lltilJ &t
.a
{
r-t iEs

¶56

ISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION

¶57

AS INFRUCTUOUS,

¶58

WITHOUT GOSTS

¶59

&1
r,.!

M/s. Word and Deed India, v. The Director General of Income Tax ( Exemptions).

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Word and Deed India, v. The Director General of Income Tax ( Exemptions).

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Valagro Biosciences Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs

M/S. Andhra Cylinders, Medak Dist. Vs Prl. Secy. Major Industries, Hyd and 4 Others

Masanipally Arjun Vs The State of Telangana

M/S.Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal

Smt. K.V. Lakshmi, Vs Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Vs Income Tax Settlement Commissioner