Mr. Nazeer Ahmed v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition seeking quashing of C.C. No. 288 of 2020 was dismissed as infructuous because the parties settled the matter before the Lok Adalat during its pendency.
A writ petition seeking quashing of C.C. No. 288 of 2020 was dismissed as infructuous because the parties settled the matter before the Lok Adalat during its pendency.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
..\
{
I
IN THE HIGH COURTfOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA :- AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Originat Jurisdiction)
[3303 ]
WEDNES-DAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry F|VE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
Between:
Mr. Nazeer Ahmed, s/o shaik Hussain, Agqo aborlts+ years, occ. Business, R/o Peer Burhan Nagar, trtanoeo, urirrjriiritL3iqi;"-
AND
...PETITIONER
Magistrate at Adilabad for putting petitioner in double jeopardy who is being prosecuted in similar nature of offence in R.C.C'(negistereo Crime Case) No. 391 of 2o2o on the file of the Hon'ble Jt. civil Judg"''So and Additionat Chief Judiciat Masistrate at Nanded, Maharashtra, to fu;;nru=i";;;;;;;,y iesar, arbitrary, violative of Article 19, 2o(2) and 21 or tiiS''cahltitrtion of tndia and -..:.. , against the principle of naturaljustice : ;..-, -
.,,.,t.,.,;;i.
i' . ' i
": ;,gE1;r,. .;.ir:_,. ,"fil*ii,', ,,:s.i,, .
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of al! furtherproceedings in C.CNo. 288 of 2O2Oon the file of the Hon'ble Judicial First ClassMagistrateat Adilabad pending adjudicationof the main writpetition
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. MIRZA NISAR AHMED BAIG
Cdunsel 1 for the RespondentNos. 1to3: SRI B. SRIDHAR, AGP FOR HOME Counselfor the Respondent No.4:-
l,
The Cou( made the following:ORDER
:{? 4 ,l
THE HON'BLE SRI JT'STICEJ. SREENTVASRAO
ORDER:
I
This writ Petition hasbeen filed seekingto quash the c.c. No.288 of 2O2O on thefrte of JudicialMagistrate of First class, Adilabad.
Misceltaneouspetitions,ifany, pending inthe Writ Petition, shall standclosed.
SD/-T. REDDY REGISTRAR
To,
,/TRUE COPY/'
SECTION OFFICER
/
BM BS4-
,, : ,.
. ,. .. '. :,.1U-&i&,jdie r' : '.- :.irdi$+Ery!EEEE{}::------ --' -- -
\
tI
llx ti
iI I J
HIGH COURT
\
E D
N
Tl-{E s
(
(J
2 B F I B 2026
R
WP.No.1886 of 2022
,i
DISMIS:SING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS
,i
$?
{
,o))"
Nazeer Ahmed
Respondent Nos. 1 to 3
Respondent No. 4
J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court