Petitioner, eligible under Management Quota (MQ-2/NRI category), erroneously failed to select that option in his NEET-PG 2024 application and sought consideration in the next counselling phase. The Court directed respondent No.2 to decide his representation expeditiously, within seven days, without expressing any opinion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THETWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLETHEACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SU.TOYPAUI AND THE HONOURABLEDR. JUSTICEG.RADHA RANI
WRIT PETITIONNO:1726OF 2O25
Between:
K Prabhanjan,S/o- KJ aoadeesh. Aqed 33 Years,Occ- Doctor, Rl/o. H.No.2-2-1073i2,KN RCoinplex Amb6rPet,VTC AmberPet, Hyderabad Telangana, 500013.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition underArticle226 of lhe constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court maybe pleased to issue directions,orders, more so, a Writ, in the nature of Mandamus' by declaring theinaction of the respondents'more particularlythe 2nd respondenthereinfornotconsideringpetitionerrepresentation/requestfor admission ADMISSIONUNDERMANAGEMENT QUOTAMQ-2 i'e''NRI Category forPost Graduate Medical Degree/Diplomacourses in next phase of counsellingorintakefortheacademicyear2o24-2025asarbitrary,illegaland unconstitutionalandconsequentlydirecttherespondentstoconsiderandpermit me for admissionADMISSION UNDER MANAGEMENT QUOTA MQ-2i'e'' NRI Category forPost Graduate Medical Degree / Diploma coursesin next phaseof counselling orintake for the academicyear 2024-2O25'
IA NO: 10F 2025
Petition under section 15'l cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider petitioner representation and permit me for ADMISSION UNDER MANAGEMENT QUOTA Me_2 i.e., NRt Categoryfor post Graduate Medicar Degree/Diproma courses in next phase of counsering or intake, during the pendency of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D.S.KISHEN
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI R.NAGARJUNA REDDY, AGP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRt T.SHARATH, SC FOR KNRUHS The Court made the following: ORDER
I(
THE HONOI'RABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTIcE SUJOY PAUL
AND
THE HONOI'RABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADIIARANI
UIRIT PETITION No.1726 of 2O2S
ORDER: (Per tlLe Hon'ble the Acting chief JusticeSujoa Psul)
Sri D.S.Kishen, learned counselfor the petitioner; Sri R.Nagarjuna Reddy, learnedAssistantGovernment Pleader for Health, Medicaland Family WelfareDepartment for respondent No.1 and Sri T.Sharath,learned Standing Counsel for Kaloji Narayarra RaoUniversity ofHealth Sciences for respondent No.2.
2
r I I
iL
Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand
closed.
SD/.K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// .4 SECTION OFFICER
\
To,
BSR
CC TODAY
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2210112025
ORDER
WP.No.1726 of 2025
f. iiE : IA
a
)
$()'
22 JA\ zffi
{
t ta
D,:.:-, - r..r il'
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION,
WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondent No.2 should be directed to decide the petitioner's representation for MQ-2 (NRI) category admission to PG medical courses for 2024-25.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K Prabhanjan
The State of Telangana
Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences
Sujoy Paul
G. Radha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
