Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition filed under Article 226 and Section 151 CrPC challenging non-implementation of an injunction. The High Court granted permission for withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13217|
oFTELANGANA
rN rHEHIGH "ouIf3Io-JtoBtf;JE
(SPecialOriginalJ urisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OFAUGUST '''"''"T"wd tHousAND AND TWENTYFlvE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICEN'TUKARAMJI
WRITPETITI ON NO:170150F 2016
Between:
y f l ilt':, 33ilJ*=-'& ft,1:,,[3f ?ilHil *3"TfJ.'fl"""'il 9."":: t ": i'lizamabaddistrict
"1?i" ,PETITIONER
AND
The Superintendentof Police' Nizamabad district at Nizamabad
...RESPONDENTS
PetitionunderArticle 226 of the Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court maybe pleasedto issue a writ or order/s moreparticularly one in the natureof Writof Mandamusdeclaring the action of the thirdrespondentin not acting uponthe representationdated 9-5-2016 submitted by thepetitioner seeking implementationof injunction orderdated28-3-2016in lA no' 109/2016in OS no' 35/2016passedby the courtof Principal Junior Civil Judgeof Nizamabad district at Armoor'as being arbitrary and violative of Articles14 and 21 of the Constitutionof lndia
t.A. NO: :t oF 2016 WP MP. NO: 20951 OF 2016
petition unJer Section .1 51 CpC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit firerd i6 5upp64 0f the petition, the High court may be preased to issue interim dir':6116n' to the 3rd respondent to forthwith imprement the injunction orde- cl?ted 28-3-2016 in rA no. 1ogr2o16 in oS no. 35r2o1.passed by the court of Principal Junior civil Judge of Nizamabad district at Armoor in favour of the petiti,ner, pending disposal of the Writ petition
Counsel for the pertitioner: SRt VIVEK JAIN
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Gp FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.4:_-
The Court made th,3 fo owing: ORDER
1
THEHONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEN'TUKARAM]I F 2o16 o NNo17o1 5 w RITP
ORDER:
ORDER: ThisWrit Petition is filed under Article226 of Constitutionof lndiaseeking the following relief/s:-
2{gW*.u-ffit* whenthe matter is taken up for hearing' learnedcounsel representingMr'VivekJain, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permissionof this Court to withdraw the writ petition'
3 Permissionis accorded'
4 Accordingly,this writ petitionis dismissedas withdrawn'
MiscellaneousPetitions,ifany'pendingshallstandclosed'
SD/. A.JAYASREE SI TANT REGISTRAR
//TRUECOPY// ECTIONOFFICER
To, 1 One CC toSri Vivek Jain, Advocate [OPUCI ^ 2 Y;; ;d;i"-GPfoi Home. l-iish C;'t for thd state of relansana' at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CDCoPies TJ GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:14 tABt2O2s
ORDER
WP.No.1t01S of 2016
r0ttiffi
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
/z/ 1b,/?,/f 5
2 provisions across 2 enactments
MADHULIKA YADAV
THE STATE OF TELANGANA
THE STATE OF TELANGANA, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NIZAMABAD DISTRICT AT NIZAMABAD
THE STATION HOUSEOFFICER, NORTHAD POLICE STATION NIZAMABAD DISTRICT AT MORTHAD
ANUSHA
N. TUKARAMJI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
