Dismissed¶20

Madaar Sangishetty v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC13 Aug 2025WP/11125/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Police-investigation inaction writ (mandamus) — Crime No. 110/2015, P.S. Arvapally, Nalgonda District; direction sought against Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Suryapet (Respondent 3) invoking Article 226 and Article 21 of the Constitution; State of Telangana (Home Department), SP Nalgonda and SHO Arvaparray among respondents. Court found the cause already redressed; writ petition dismissed as infructuous, no costs; miscellaneous applications closed. Bench: Sri Justice N'Tukaramji. No precedent cited; no monetary relief.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted. The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs ('No costs'), and pending miscellaneous applications, if any, were directed to be closed. ¶20

Madaar Sangishetty Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

.32171

¶2

HrGHcouRr."iJff",t"l3LE,:5Hh|$:,$$ATHYDERABAD N^{c u st} w ED^{N E s DAY' r H E rH rsx-tJl[} 3,s'ff

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE^{HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEN'TUKARAMJI}

¶5

WRIT PETI^{TloNNO :11125oF2016}

¶6

Between:

¶7

v3,iX1k",fl,il:lli$lif#[x1[',.?s5,&%19,,',R%X.o1iK"fl:,.3:"r',.Hiness',R/o

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of^{Telangana, Rep' by its Principal Secretary Department of Home'} s.jlr6tuiiieuldingis'^Hvderabad'

¶11

2 The Superintendent^{of Police' Nalgonda'}

¶12

3 The Sub^{Divisional Police Officer' Suryapet' NalgondaDistrict'}

¶13

4 The Station^{House Officer,P S Arvapally' NalgondaDistrict'} 5 Ir/amidi Somaiah,^{S/o Punnaiah,aqld.major' Fl/o V} ardhamanukota^village, iaiiii"iol,ijro".^{Mand al, Nalgonda District'}

¶14

6 lrilamidi Ramanamma, r)ir?rljl,^{i'riiii,io Jvg rui. W/o Mand Somaiah' a I' N alsond aged a District'major'} R/ o Vardhamanukota

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition^{under Article 226 of the Constitutionof lndia praying that} in the circumstances^{statedin the affidavit filed therewith, the High Courtmay be} !ffi^{in tne natureor} [[Nflililurnl ilil rffil lloillutllXilt 0^0,00 completing Writ of Mandamus^{declaring the inactionof the 3rd respondent in not} the investigation^{in Crime No'110/2015'pending on the file of the P'S} . ArvaPallY, as being^{illegal, arbitrary,unconstitutionaland violativeof Article} 21 of the complete Constitution,andconsequentlydirecttherespondentNo.3to investigation^{in CrimeNo.1 10i2015, pending on the file of P'S Arvapally}

¶17

..J

¶18

¶19

Considering^{the submission and the develrprnent that has} transpirecl^{andas the cause raised in the presentivlit petitionhas} already^{been redressed,nothing further remainsto ire adiudicated} in this^{writ petition and the same is liable to be artc is accordingly}

¶20

dismissed^{as infructuous' No costs'}

¶21

Pending^{miscellaneousapplications' ifrrtty'shall stand}

¶22