Petitioner sought quashing of an FIR and a Section 41A Cr.P.C. notice. The State reported that a charge sheet had been filed and cognizance taken as C.C. No. 9734 of 2021, so the cause of action no longer survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 16912 OF 2020
Between:
Syed AbdahuQuadri, Kashaf, S/o. Syed AijazQuadri, Age about 25years, Occ.Political Strategist and Social Activist, H. No, 16-9-427 I A I 2, old Malakpct, Hyderabad 500 036.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction, one more particrlarly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, BY COMMAND toquash h Crime No. 85 of2O2O uls153 505(1) (C ) 505(2)(Ex.P1 ) therebyissued by RespondentNo.4 and consequent notice u/s 41(A) No. 116 Book No. 3, dt. 18-09-2020(Ex. P2) asarbitrary, capricious, bad in law, illegal, violative ofprinciples ofnaturaljustice, Dehorsany power in provisions besides unconstitutional against Article 19, 21 of Constitution of lndia andpowers of Sec. l54Cr.P.C. , abuse andprocess of law laid downby Supreme Court in State of Haryana Vs. Ch.Bhajanlaland others,Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar, Shreya Singhal Vs.Union oflndia.
lA NO: 2 OF 2O2O
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the c r )umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Cor,r may be pleased to suspend all further proceedings in FIR dt. 11-O1-202O at 12.4 ) hrs in Crime No. g5 of 2020 u/s 505(1)(C ), 505(2) (Ex.P1), Notice u/s a1(A) Cr.r I No. 116, dt.18-09- 2O2o ( Ex.P2).
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MIR MASOOD KHAN
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.4:---
The Court made the following: OROER
I 0
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE J. SREENryAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.16912 of2O2O
ORDER:
When the matter came up forhearing,the learned AssistantGovernmentPleader for Home submits that during the pendency of the writpetition,the Investigating Officers, after conducting investigation,have filed a charge sheet before the concerned Court,which has taken cognizanceand numberedthe case as C.C.No.9734 of 2021.
2
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, s hall also stand
closed.
Sd/ M.OSMAN ALI BAIG AS!; STANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SE ON OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to Sri Mir Masood Khan, Advocate IOPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court for the State of11 langana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies TJ PMK tr
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410912025
ORDER
WP.No.16912 ot 2020
12 iii iila
\ia,
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION
WITHOUT COSTS (n-
\b tlL1)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR in Crime No. 85 of 2020 and notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C. should be quashed.
Syed AbdahuQuadri, Kashaf
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Home)
CCS, Detective Department, Hyderabad
The S.I. of Police, SIT, Detective Department, Hyderabad
V. Vinod Goud
J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
