A medical aspirant sought consideration under the NRI (MQ-2) management quota for MBBS admission 2024-25 after mistakenly not selecting the option in her application. The Court directed respondent No.2 to decide her pending representation expeditiously within seven days, without expressing any opinion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13437l
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Originat Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTTCE G.RADHA RANI
WRIT PET]TION NO:1 589 0F 2025
Between:
Ms. Vengaldas Anuja, D/o. Vengaldas Srinivas, Aged 26 years, Occ- Doctor, R/rc. H. No. 8- 1 5, Bo rirmakat, Ka rim na ga r mina ;i, frd e"#ri iirli;rrft ;;; 505001
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue directions, orders, more so, a writ, in the nature of Mandamus, by declaring the inaction of the respondents, more particurarry the 2nd respondent herein for not considering petitioner representation/request for admission ADMlssloN UNDER MANAGEMENT euorA Me-2 in MBBS i.e., NRI category in next phase of counseiling for the academic year 2024-202s as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequenfly direct the respondents to consider and permit the petitioner for admission ADMlssloN uNDER MANAGEMENT QUOTA Me-2 in MBBS, i.e., NRI Category for academic year 2024-2025 in next phase of counseling.
IA NO: 10F 2025
Petition underSection 151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filedin supportof the petition,the High Courtmay be pleasedto direct the 2ndrespondentto consider the petitioner representation and permit her for ADMISSIONTJNDERMANAGEMENT QUOTA MQ-2 in MBBS' i e'' is NRI category for theaaademic year 2024-2025 in next phaseof counselling, during thependency of the above writ petition.
Counsel for thePetitioner:SRID.S.KISHEN
Counsel fortheRespondent No.1:SRI R'NAGARJUNAREDDY' AGP FOR MEDICALHEALTH FW
Counsel for theRespondent No.2:SRI T'SHARATH,SC FOR KNRUHS
The Court madethe following: ORDER
I
I I
I I
THE HONOI'RABLE TIIE ACTING CIIIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAIIL AND
THE HONOT'RABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADIIA RANI
WRIT PETITI ON No.1589 of2o25
ORDER: (Per the Hon ble th,e Actiag Chjef Justice Sujou paul)
Sri D.S.Kishen, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri R.Nagarjuna Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department for respondent No.1 and Sri T.Sharath, learned Standing Counsel for Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences for respondent No.2.
2
-:
.)a Learne<1 StandingCounselfor respondent No 2 has no objection for thisinnocuous prayer'
Interiooutory applications,if any pending,shal1 stald
closed.
SD/.K.AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// v sEcIoN dprlceR \
To,
BSR
CC TODAY
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2210112025
ORDER
STAT
!L e
1j
t- '(
v
3 22 JAI'I um
,)'/.
,j,
I
'-:,=_-. j:.---
WP.No.1589 of2025
DISPOSINGOF THE WRIT PETITION' WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondent No.2 should be directed to decide the petitioner's representation for MBBS admission under Management Quota MQ-2 (NRI category) in the next phase of counselling.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vengaldas Anuja
The State of Telangana, Health and Family Welfare Department
Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences
Sujoy Paul
G. Radha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
