Vunukonda Veeresham Vs State of Telangana

Vunukonda Veeresham, S/o Bhumaiah, aged 69 years, Occ Agriculture and Retired Employee, Fl/o H.No. 4-5-14, Subhashanagar, Peddapalli, Peddapalli District, (erstwhile Karimnagar District

¶10

Vunukonda Kanakatara, W/o Veeresham, aged 64 years, Occ Housewife, Rl/o H.No 4-5-14, Subhashanagar, Peddapalli, Peddapalli District, (erstwhile Karimnagar District)

¶11

...pETrroNERS

¶12

AND

¶13

State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶14

The District Collector, Peddapalli District ( erstvvhile Karimnagar District)

¶15

The Additional District Collector, Peddapalli District ( erstwhile Karimnagar District)

¶16

The Appellate Authority and Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli, Peddapalli District ( erstwhile Karimnagar District)

¶17

The Tahsildar, Peddapalli Mandal, Peddapalli District^(erstwhile Karimnagar District)

¶18

Vunukonda Laxmiprasannam, Wo late Vunukonda Shanker, aged 60^years, Govt. Employee, Ri/o H.No. 4-5-14, Subhashnagar, Peddapalli, Peddapalli District' (erstwhile Karimnagar District)

¶19

...RES'.NDENTS

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction more in the nature of Writ of l\rlandamus declaring the order^passed by the Respondent No.4^i.e. Appellate Authority and Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli, Peddapalli District^{in Appeal} No. 821256912016 dated 24l8l2O2O cancelling the Form-13(B) and^Form-13(C) validation certificates issued in favour of the Petitioners in respect of the^{land in} Sy-No. 238 extent Ac.4-12^guntas and Sy,No.238 extent Ac. 4-00^acres respectively situated at Rangampally village, Peddapalli Mandal, Peddapalli District and also cancelling the entries made in Pattadar Pass Books and^Title

¶21

I

¶22

Deeds while directing the Respondent No.5 i.e. Tahsildar, F eddapalli l/andal to restore the entries in the pahartie.s which were existing in he revenue records prior to implementation of entries as per the Form 13-B rnd 13-C validation certificates and also to seize the Pattadar Pass Books and'itle deeds issued in favour of the petitioners forthwith by treating the petition file r by the Respondent No.6 dated 241512016 as an Appeal even though no appeal^,ras filed as required under Section 5(B) of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattr dar Pass Books Act 1971 and Rule 22-A of the Telangana Rights in Land and F attadar Pass Books Rules 1989 and even though no application has been filed for condoning the delay in filing the Appeal is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, without juri ;diction as the same is contrary to the procedure prescribed under the provisicr s of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1 971 and it e rules made there under and also well settled principles of law laid down by thir; Honsble Court while deciding the cases arising under the said Act and the Rules il rd as such the same may be set aside.

¶23

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶24

Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the cirr umslances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order passed by the Respondent No.4 i.e. Af,t ellate Authority and Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapalli, Peddapalli Dis:r ct in Appeal No. 821256912016 dated 241812020 cancelling the Form-13i t ) and Form-13(C) validation certificates issued in favour of the Petitioners in r spect of the land in Sy.No.238 extent Ac.4-12 guntas and Sy No. 238 ex ent Ac.4-00 acres respectively situated at Rangampally village, Peddapalli Mandal, Peddapalli District and also cancelling the entries made in Pattadar [) rss Books and Ti e Deeds including serzure of Pattadar Pass Books and Title leeds issued in our favour.

¶25

lA NO: 2 OF 2020

¶26

Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the cir( rmstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court mE \ be pleased that the interim order granted by, this Hon'ble Court in lA No.1 of ZO2) in Wp No. 15365 of

¶27

2020 dated 241912020 granting status quo order may be extended until further orders.

¶28

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI V.RAVI KIRAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 5: SRI H.RAKESH KUMAR, AGP FOR REVENUE

¶29

Counsel for the Respondent No.6: -

¶30

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶31

-7

¶32

\ \

¶33

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VEI UGOPAL

¶34

WF2o2o

¶35

ORDER:

¶36

Sri V.Rohith, learncd counsel reprcscnting lc rrned counsel on recorcl for tlrc petitioner submits that thc ca l ;e in the writ petition does not survivc for consideration ers the disputes between the parties have bcen settled bcfore thc L rk Adalat. In proof of the samc, he has tiled a copy of the Au,zrrr! passed by the Lok Adalzrt in Lok Adalat Case No.67 of 2022 in O.|; No.27 of 2Ol7 dated 13.08.2O22, zrnd secks to close the WriL petilir n.

¶37

Sri H.Rakcsh Kumar, lcarned Assistanr Govcrn men t Pleader representing learncd (iovcrnmerlt plearlr.r for Revenue takes no objection.

¶38

Recording the submission of the learned ( ( Llnscl for the petitioner, this Writ petition is closed. Thcrc sherll le no order as to costs. As a scquel. misr.ellaneous pctif ions, i: rny. pending, shall stand dismisscd.

¶39

SD/-! .JAWAHAR REDDY ASSI iTANT REGISTRAR G

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To

1 One CC to SRI V RAVI KIRAN^{RAO, Advocate} [OPUC] 2 Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court^{for the Stat, of Telangana, at} Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies

PSK. PMK Pft

HIGH COURT

DATE D : 1 010912025

ORDER

WP.No.15365 of 2020

+t i.:t, ?$fi tl,l
\j
, .,:)/