Three Hyderabad Cricket Association office-bearers sought quashing of FIR No.315 of 2016 of Uppal Police Station. During the writ petitions' pendency the investigation concluded in a charge sheet and cognizance as C.C.No.699 of 2016, so the court disposed of the petitions with liberty to seek other remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Originat Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION OS: 1509 .15132 15253 0F 2016
W.P.No.15091 of 2016
Between:
M. Narendar Goud, Son of late Sri. tt/l Raghavulu, Aged about 5Z years, Occupation Vice President, Hyderabad Cricket Ass5ciation, ntiiO"nt of H.No. 16-7- t32l 1 Osmanpura, Chaderghat, Hyderabad.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari, by calling for the records of F.l.R.No.31 5 of 2o16 of police Station Uppal Cyberabad and consequently quash the same as against the Petitioner herein as arbitrary, itlegal and violative of principles of Natural Justice.
(prayer is amended as per court order dated 1o-g-2025 in l.A.No.2 of 2O16 (WPMP.N o.19415 of 201 6)
!.A.NO:1 OF 2016(WPMP.NO :,1 oF 2016)
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit liled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further pr()ceedings including arrest of the Petitioner in F.l.R.No.3l5 ol 2O16 dated 23.04 20'l 6 on the file of Uppal Police Station, Cyberabad, pending disposal of the above wrlt petition.
Counsel for lhe Petitioner : SRI V.RAMCHANDER GOUD
Counsel forthe Respondents : GP FOR HOME
W.P.NO: 151:12 OF 2016
Between:
A.Koti Reddy Son of A V.K. Reddy,, Occupation Executive Member, Hyderabad Cricket Association, Resident of Vijayapuri Colony, Kothapet, Hyderabad.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certior,ari, by calling for the records of F.l.R.No.315 of 2016 of police Station Uppal Cyberabad and consequently quash the same as against the Petitioner herein as arbitrary, illegal and violative of principles of Natural Justice.
(prayer is amended as per Court Order dated 10-9-2OZS in l.A.No.2 of 2016 (WPMP.No.1 9417 ot 201 6l
|.A.NO:1 OF 2016 {WPMP.NO:18783 oF 20161
Petition Under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioner in F.l.R.No.315 of 2016 daled 23.O4.2016 on the file of Uppal police Station, Cyberabad, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI V.RAMCHANDER GOUD
Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR HOME
W.P.NO: 15253 OF 2016
Between:
P.K. SHASTRI, Son of P. Sambashiv Rao, Aged about 46 Vears, Occuoation Executive V"lnP"r, H.yderabad Cricket Association, Resident of H.No,q_f i_S3lS, Dwarakamai Colony, Vanasthalipuram, R.R. District.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari, by calling for the records of F.l.R.No.315 of 2016 of police Station Uppal Cyberabad and consequently quash the same as against the Petitioner herein as arbitrary, illegal and violative of principles of Natural Justice.
(prayer is amended as per Court Order dated 1O-9-ZO2S in !.A.No.2 of 2016 (WPMP.No.19419 of 20161
!.A.NO:1 OF 2016(WPMP.NO:18914 OF 2016)
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit liled in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further pr,rceedings including arrest of the petitioner in F.l.R.No. 315 of 2016 dated 23.O4.2016 on the file of Uppal Police Station, Cyberabad, pending d.isposal of tl^e above writ petition
Counsel for lhe Petitioner : SRI V.RAMCHANDER GOUD
Counsel for lhe Respondents : AGP FOR HOME
The Court made the following COMMON ORDER
ti i t
THE HON:BLE SRT JUSTICE J. SREBNIVASRAO WRIT PETI-,'ION Nos.l l^15132 and 152 of 2O16
CO RDI.]R
These writ petitions have beenfii'-=dseekingto quash FIR No.3l5 of 2016 of Uppal Police Station,Cyberabad.
2
Howr:ver, liberty is granted to the petitioners to avail remedies as
availtrble under law. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand ctosed
.C. SULEKHA DEVI ANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPYII
ECTION OFFICER 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Telangana : at Hycerabad.
To
2 The Crmmissioner Of Police Cybera bad, Telangana State.
3 The Slation House Officer, U ppal Po lice Station, Cyberabad 4 Two CCs to GP FOR HO[\IE, H igh Court for the State of Telangana at Hyder:rbad . [our] 5. One CC to SRI V.RAMCHANDER GOUD, Advocate IOPUC] 6. Two CD Copies SA GJP .++l-
HIGH COURT
DATED:r10/0912025
COMMON ORDER
TI,IE s
1,,.f
()
? 7 F{:B lut,t .{l
rf
* J
I
WP.Nos.15091, 15132 AND 15253 of 2016
DISPOSING OF THE W.P'S
WITHOUT COSTS.
pf to,lu
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M. Narendar Goud
A. Koti Reddy
P.K. Shastri
The State of Telangana, Represented by Principal Secretary, Home Department
Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad
Station House Officer, Uppal Police Station, Cyberabad
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
