Writ petition by a successful tenderer seeking mandamus for grant of lease and quashing of a letter refusing it. The court noted the lease agreement under the tender was for only eleven months, so no cause of action survived, and closed the writ petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132521
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO:'t46 OF 2010
Between:
M/s. Unique lnteriors, a Partnership Flrm, Shop No.C-6, Cellar, Ashok plaza, H.No.'10-1-126, Beside Hotel Golconda, Ivlasab Tank, Hyderabad, represented by its Proprietor Managing Partner Sri K.A.M. Anees.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased lo issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Mandamus or otherwise declaring the inaction on the part of the Respondent No.1 and No.2 in not granting the lease to the Petitioner, in spite of he being the successful tenderer against tender notification dated 12.9.2009 of the First Respondent is illegal, arbitrary, colourable exercise of power, violative of principles of natural justice and against Art. 14 and 19 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently set aside the letter dated 3.12.2009 bearing No. Administrative Cell/53/Accommodation/Uniquei 2009 of the First Respondent No.1.
"7
l.A. NO: 1 OF 201O(WPMP NO: 157 OF 2010)
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumslances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased direct the Respondent No.1 not to allot the 5 Shutters i.e., 3 shutters of.1346 sft and 2 shutters of 928 sft at premises No.10-4-2, Grama parishram;,rla Bhavanam, situated at Humayun Nagar, Hyderabad belonging to the First Res pondent to any third party, pending disposal of this Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. T S PRAVEEN KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI V T M PRASAD SC FOR KHADI BOARD
Counsel for the Respondent NO.2: AGP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3&S: --
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI NANDIGAM KRISHNA RAC)
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION No. 146 OF 2O1O
ORDER:
Heard Sri T.S. Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri V.T.M. Prasad, learned Standing Counset for Khadi Board, appearing onbehalf of respondent No.1, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Industries, appearing on behalfof respondent No.2 and Sri Nandigama Krishna *:o, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondentNo'4.
" ... to issue a Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Mandarnus or otherwise declaring theinactionon the part oF the Respondent Nos 1 and 2 innot granting the lease to the Petitioner in spite ofhe being the successful tenderer againsttender notification dated 12-9-2009 of the First Respondent is illegal, arbitrary, colourableexercise ofpower violative ofprinciples of naturaljustice and against Art 14 and 19 of the Constitution ofIndiaand consequently set aside the letter dated3-12-2009 bearing No. AdministrativeCell/53/Accommodation/
a
2
-l l
wP t46 2010
Unique/2009 of the First Respondent No. :. and be pleased to pass
The miscellaneous applications, if any penrling, shall
stand closed.
SD/.MoHD. ISMAIL ASflSTtANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
To,
vlSECT|ON OFFICER
One CC to SRI. T S PRAVEEN KUMAR Advocate [OPUC]
5 Two CD Copies KKS GJP
'
'--1
€
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410212025
ORDER
WP.No.146 of 2010
I $F- STA Ie
k
1O APR zOIH
o
{+
-t o e .sparc viF- l-
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
g / I Ar ,
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondents 1 and 2 could withhold granting lease to the petitioner despite it being the successful tenderer against the tender notification dated 12.9.2009.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Unique Interiors, a Partnership Firm, represented by its Proprietor Managing Partner Sri K.A.M. Anees
The A.P. Khadi and Village Industries Board, represented by its Chief Executive Officer
Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by the Secretary to Government, Industries and Commerce Department
Metpally Khadi Samsthan, Metpally, Karimnagar District, represented by Secretary
Singareni Seva Samithi, C/o. Singareni Collieries Co., Godavari Khani, District Karimnagar, represented by General Manager
Vavilala Khadi Gramodaya Pratishtha [Khadi Commission], Vavitala Village, District Karimnagar
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
