A contempt case alleging violation of an interim order dated 06.01.2010 in W.P.M.P. No. 158 of 2010 was closed because the underlying W.P. No. 148 of 2010 itself had become infructuous and was closed on 04.02.2025.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132521
i ; I I l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 62OF 2010
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the orders dated 06-01-2010 passed by this Hon'ble Court in WPtvlP No. 158 of 2010 in WP No. 148 of 2010.
Between:
M/s. Unique lnteriors, a Partnership Firm, Shop No.C-6, Cellar, Ashok Plaza, H.No.10-1-'126, Beside Hotel Golconda, Masab Tank, Hyderabad, represented by its lt/anaging Partner Sri K.A.IVI. Anees.
...PETITIONER
AND
...CONTEMNORS
l.A. NO:'l OF 2011(APPL. NO:27'l OF 2011)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To grant permission to AP, Khadi and V.l. Board to advertise in the newspaper calling for public tenders from those doing business in Khadi and Allied products for letting out on rent shop No. 1& 2 situated at H. No. 10/4/2, Grama Parishramala Bhavan, A.P, KhadiV.l Board, Humayun Nagar, Hyderabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl T.S. PRAVEEN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: SRI V.T.M. PRASAD
The Court made the following: ORDER
tl
i
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLINANDA EMPT CASE N 1
ORDER]
Heard Sri T,S. Praveen Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of thepetitioner and Sri V.T,M. Prasad, learned counsel appearing onbehalf of the respo ndent.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any,pending shall stand
closed.
Sd/- I. NAGA KSHMI DEPUTY RE ISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SE:rlTlON OFFICER
To,
,,,
AR/gh
I I Ii l I I I
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410212025
ORDER
CC.No.62 of 2010
1 HE Sra r(-
(
(.
l1
! I
ll la APf, 2025 (
I
I
a) rC 6O
CLOSING THE CONITEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS,
/ ,,2 ,< 2-,'_.' 7,/4./r f
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt proceedings should continue when the underlying writ petition has become infructuous.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Unique Interiors, represented by its Managing Partner Sri K.A.M. Anees
Shri M.V. Satyanarayana IAS, Chief Executive Officer, A.P. Khadi and Village Industries Board
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
