Writ petition alleging police inaction against encroachment attempts on petitioners' residential property was dismissed for non-prosecution, as petitioners repeatedly failed to appear or represent the matter despite being listed for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3183 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jqrisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTIOE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITI N 49 F 15
Beween:
All are R1p. H No 84giB,Phase-l,Allrlvyn Colony Kukatpally, Balanqgar rpandal, R R.Qistript:
...PFTrTtONER6
AND
5 Slnt J.S.ujatha Wo,Somaiah.a/4.38 Yr9 , Occ House wife R/q Pedapadishata village, Qundgla maridal,Nalgpnda distric{.
...8E$PONDENTS
Fetition upder ArflClp 2?6 of the Qgqs{itutionqf lndia praylng thet in the circumstances stated in lhe ?fffd3yit filed therewith, the High Cgurt may be pleqsed to issue an apprqpriale qlder or {itectiqn pqrticularly more one in tho nature of Writ of MANAQAMUS deelaring lhe inaction of respondept [tlos. 2 and 3 in preventing the illegal eltempts Oy 19snonlglt no.-5 in creating ngigance and tq encJoacfi our residential property bearing H.Np. 4.32-727 in plot nq. B-E49, at l.Phase, Allwyn colqny, Kukatpally,BTlanagpr mandal, R.R.Dist(lCt, is illegal, unethicql, cgpricious, with ulterior motives and violation of our Rights under Articleq 19 and 21 of Constitution of lndia and pass orders accerdingly in the interest of Juqtice.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 17716 OF 20151
letitionunder Section 151qPP pr?l!.19that in the circumgt?ncesstated in the affidgyil filed in support of thepetition, the l-ligh Court may b9pleqsed to direct therespondq4ts Nos 2&3 to Breventthe respondgnt nq.-sqlq her pegple in crea[ingngisanpe theirattempts tQ encrgQch erresidenlialptqpprypearing H N94132-727 inplot no 8-849, at l,.f [asg, Allv]yn Qolony, Kukatpqlly, Balenagar tnendalR R Qistrictsinqg 20-{-fQ15 AndpaFS qr.$erq ggcop(ingly ip lhe Intqrpst ofJustice. else hesvy loss & prgjqdice,
Qounsglfor thePetitiorler;SRl. SREENATH 60NQAPALLY
Oqqnselfor thgResponqent l!os. 1to4: Gp FPR IIOME
Coqnsef for the Respondent No.S:--
ThQ Cqqrt mE{e th9 followingi ORPER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEB. VI'AYSENREDDY
WRIT PETITION No.13492of 2015 -
ORDER:
When the matter was takenup for hearing on L9.O2.2025, as there was no representationon behalfof the petitioners, it was directed to be listedunderthe caption'ForDismissal" Even today, when the matter is takenup for hearing, neither the petitioners appear nor there is anyrepresentation on their behalf. It appears that thepetitioners arenot interestedin prosecuting the matter'
In view of the above, thewrit petition is dismissed for
non -prosecution. The miscellaneouspetitions pending, if any,shall
stand closed. There shall beno order as to costs.
I
SD/.L. LAKSHMIBABU A IS ANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
ECTION OFFICER
To,
BM BS
I ,
)
HIGH COURT
DATED:25t0212025
ORDER
WP.No.13492 ot 2015
r
sl
3 01 Aiii 21;2i <br>t {
t bESpa rCvli
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
p ,./ ,1 c2 /-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D. Ramesh
D. Anitha
D. Arun
D. Ajay
The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad
The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Kukatpally
B. Vijaysen Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
