Dismissed¶32

J. Sharath Kumar v. The State of Telanagana

Telangana HC23 Apr 2025WP/12114/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court; W.P. No. 12114 of 2025; J. Sharath Kumar v. State of Telangana and others; challenge to excise cancellation order dated 11.04.2025 by DPEO Secunderabad; withdrawal with liberty to avail remedies under Telangana Excise Act, 1968; IA No. 1 of 2025 u/S 151 CPC; Justice T. Vinod Kumar; decided 23-04-2025; dismissed as withdrawn, no costs.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedies provided under the Telangana Excise Act, 1968; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn, no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, closed. ¶32

J. Sharath Kumar Vs The State of Telanagana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[^3166l

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL . TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTTCE T.VINOD KUMAR

¶7

WR]T PET]TION NO: 12114 OF 2025

¶8

Between:

¶9

J. Sharath Kumar. S/o J.Gopal,..age.37 yrs old, Occ.,Business, Rl/o H.No.701, Road No. 7e, Fitmnagar, sF!,p-"j,-ulralri6io]tiiln"ee of M/s paradise Wines,^ptot No. 5A, s.6 nbao,Fdisjn ioiJnil3".j.r'ni"r"u.o

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND'l rhe State of reranagana, Rep by prr Secretary Revenue(Excise) Secretariat Telangana, Hyderabld.

¶12

2' ' The co-mmissioner of proh and Excise, Terangana state, Abkari Bhavan Nampally, Hyderabad.

¶13

3' rf" Deputy commissioner of proh and Excise, Hyderabad Division, Abkari Bhavan Nampally, Hyderabad

¶14

The District Prohibition and Excise Officer, Secunderabad

¶15

SHO Proh and Excise Officer, Secunderabad, Telangana State.

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under. Articre 226 ot the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated- in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue the writ of mandamus to decrare the action of respondent no. 4 in issuing the canceilation order in Fire No.cr. No.82t413r2024/DpEo(S) dated. 11'04.2025, as iilegar, arbitrary, unconstitutionar and against the principres of Natural Justice.

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶19

Petition under section is1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to suspend the operation of the cancellation order in File No.Cr.No.

¶20

B2l413l2O24lDPEC)(S rlated . 11.04.2025 issued by the District P'oh and Excise

¶21

Officer, Secundera r:< . pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶22

Counsel for the Petiti rner: SRI MD.MURTUZA ALI FARUQUI

¶23

Counsel for the Resp, rndents: GP FOR PROHIBITION EXCISE

¶24

The Court made the fr ilowing: ORDER

¶25

/t' E SIAI c U6
'; '- '
L: {J r1A\ 2025
!a
t^
. {a.
t
..,,"
\i= i P,,T C

¶26

¶27

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR

¶28

WRIT PETITION No. 121L4 of 2o25

¶29

ORDER

¶30

After making initial submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedies provided under the Telangana Excise Act, 1968

¶31