Disposed

D.Radhakrishna v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC22 Apr 2025WP/12110/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Landowners sought a direction to authorities to deposit the entire enhanced land acquisition compensation decreetal amount to the credit of pending execution proceedings before the Senior Civil Judge, Narayanpet. Following an earlier similar order, the writ petition was disposed directing deposit within four months.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to deposit entire decreetal amount to credit of E.P.No.9 of 2025 in L.A.O.P.No.1 of 2014 within four months.

D.Radhakrishna Vs The State of Telangana — Execution and Attachment | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³²⁵⁵¹

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO:12110 O F 2025

¶7

Between:

¶8

D.Radhakrishna, S/o: Sanjanna, Age. 55 years, Occ. Agriculture.

¶9

P. Sujathamma, W/o: Late Srinivas Reddy, Age.45 years, Occ. Agriculture,

¶10

Chinna Mallikarjun, S/o: prathap Rudradev, Age.32 years, Occ. Agriculture,

¶11

D.Narayana, S/o: Ramulu, Age_ 6g years, Occ. Agriculture, All are R/o Jaklair Village, tVakthal [/andal, Narayanpet District.

¶12

...PETITIONERS

¶13

AND

¶14

The State of Telangana, Rg,p OI its prlncipal Secretary, Revenue (LA) uepa rtment, Dr. B. R.Ambedkar SecretariaI ift;;J;11

¶15

2 The State of Telanoana. Rg.p. by its Secretary, Finance and planning Department. or.e. R nm'beotiriSuo"tii"j,Jr'v,i#;;;

¶16

J The Chief Commissioner. Land Administration, Nampally Rly Station Road, Hyderabad.

¶17

4 The Diskict Collector, Naryanpet District, Narayanpet. The Land Acquisition Officer and Revenue Divisional Officer, Narayanpet, Narayanpet District.

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Articre 226 0t the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction particurarry one in the nature of writ of lrlandamus to decrare the action of the Respondent authorities in not depositing the entire decretar amount to the credit of the Ep No.9 0f 2025 inl.A.o.p No.1 0f 2O14 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Narayanpet, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Judgment of Larger Bench reported in 2005 (3) ALD 233.

¶20

tA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶21

Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent authorities to deposit the entire decreetal amount to the credit of E.P.No 9 ol 2025 in L.A.O.P.No.1 of 2014, on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Narayanpet, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P. GlRl KRISHNA

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1,3,4 and 5: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR FINANCE AND PLANNING

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVANI{UMAR}

¶26

WRIT PETITIO^{N No.12 llO of 2025}

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

Heard learned counsel^{for the petitioner and learned} Government Pleader^{forLand Acquisition appearing for} respondent^{Nos. 1} , 3,^{4and 5and Learned Governmentfor} Finance and Pianning^{appearingfor respondent No'2' With the} consent of the^{parties, this writ petition is being taken up for} disposal at the^{admissionstageitself'}

¶29

This u'rit petition^{is filed seeking follon'ing prayer:}

¶30

"to d.eclare the^{action of the respottdent authontiesin} not d-epositing the^{entire decreetal amountto the} credit of tLte E.P^{No.9 of 2025 in L'A'O'PNo'1 of 2014} on the file of the^{Senior Ciuil Judge at NaraAanpet'} as illegal, arbitrary^{and contrargto the Judgmentof} Larger Bench^{reported in 2OO5(3) ALD 233'"}

¶31

It is the case^{of the petitioners that their lands are} situated at Jaklair^{Village ofMakthalMandalwhich were} acquired by^{respondent No'5 herein for the purpose of formation} of BG Railr,t'ay^{Line andStar'ion FromMunirbad to} Mahabubnagar and^{Jaklair Village,Makthal Mandal'Thereafter'} notification under^{Section 4(1) and Draft Declaration6 of the} Lemd Acquisition^{Act was published in the GazetleNo'MBNR-}

¶32

\ I

¶33

¶34

012^{on 09.02.2012. After due enquiry, the Land Acquisition} er has^{categorizedthe acquired iands into categories I, II, III,} d fixed^{the market value for the land atRs.75,000/-,} ,OOO/-,^{Rs.85,000/ andRs.95,OO0/-respectively} dafter,^{petitionershave filed LAOP.No.lof 2014 before Senior} Judge,^Narayanpet for^fixation of fair market^price I gly the said LAOP.No.1 of 2014 \,as allowed and ensation was enhanced. Subsequent thereto, petitioners have filed E.P.No.9 of 2025 for attachment of schedule properties and for depositing the entire decreetal amount to the credit ol E.P.No.9 of 2025, hou,ever, the same is pending for adjudication.

¶35

Today n,hen the matter has been takerr up for hearing, Iearned counsel for the petitioner submits that in similar ':. crrcumstances this Court in W.P.No.12837 of 2023 dated 28.O4.2023, passed the follovving order:-

¶36

"S.Hauing regard to the same, the Writ petition is disposed of an-d respond.ent 1[o.5 is directed, to deposit the decretal amount in terms of the ord.er an.ddecree, dated 30.03.2011, passed. in O.p.No.65 of 2009 bg the Senior Ciuil Jud_ge, Gadlual, to tlrc cred-it of EaP.No 5 of 2023 in O.p.No.65 of 2OO9 on the file of Senior Ciutt Jud.ge, Gad.tual, as expeditiously as possible, ,at any iate u$tfuiry a peAid of four 1+1 months'from the date oj i.eieipt of a copy of this order. There shalt be no ord.er as to costs.,,

a. t,Ia tr

-gnXg=

tl/.^\e

Learned counsel for the petitioner further pray this Court to pass similar orders as passed in W.p.No. 12a37 of 2023 d,ated 28.O4.2023.

¶41

Learned Government pleaders appearing for respondents did not disputb the same.

¶42

7.. Recording the submission made by learned counsel appearing on either side and in terms of order passed by this Court in W.P.No. 12832 of 2023 dated 28.04.2023, this writ petition is disposed of directing. the respondent authorities to deposit the decreetal amount in terms of the order and decree, passed in L.A.O.P No.l of 2014, by the Senior Civil Judge at Narayarpet, to the credit of E.p No.9 of 2O2S in L.A.O.p No.1 of 2074 on the file of Senior Civil Judge at Narayanpet, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within a period of four (4) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶43

B. Accordingly, this u,rit petition IS disposed of.

¶44

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

¶45

SD/.MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUW REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

ECTION OFFICER

To,

The Principal Secreta ry, Revenue (LA) De partment, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Secretaria( The State of Telangana, Hy6erabad.

¶51

The Secreta ry, Finance and Plannin g Department, Dr.B-R.Ambedkar Secretariat, The State of Telangana Hyderabad

¶52

The Chief Commissioner, Land Administration, Nampally Rly Station Road, Hyderabad

¶53

The Diskict Collector, Naryanpet District, Naravanoet.

¶54

the Land Acquisition Officer and Revenue Divisional Officer, Narayanpet, Narayanpet District.

¶55

One CC to Sri P Giri Krishna, Advocate [OPUCI

¶56

,t..';:{&:.:'

¶57

7 ror Land Acquisition, Hrgh courtior the State of rerangana, ],-,:,,:3;l:.:P B Two CC to The Gp tor Finar Prannins' High court ror the state or I I;5ar66#:1ft.I[ililu"frand TJ GJP I

HIGH COURT

\ DATED:2210412025

ORDER

t
7
)
2[25 o
0 'l I'r xt I
at I
t
t fiEspetC o

¶64

WP.No.12110 of 2025

¶65

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION

¶66

WITHOUT COSTS

¶67

@qo W

D.Radhakrishna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Radhakrishna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt.Burugula Laxmi Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Hina Begum Vs M/s Teena Enterprises

Gundumalla Venkataiah Vs The Union of India

The Korlagudem P.A.C.S Vs The Chief Executive Officer

Jawaji Kamalamma , Babamma Vs Government of Telangana

Ambareesh Jonnavittula Vs The Union of India