Landowners sought a mandamus against land acquisition proceedings without due process under the 2013 Act. Counsel for petitioners sought withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to pursue remedies available under law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 ]
HIGHcouRr t?TI1=":IiHoF TELANGANA (SPecialOriginalJurisdiction)
*"-
r H uRS DAY r55 S^=Js }LBT.IE,?+Iro,,tJ'
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEC'V' BHASKARREDDY
WRITPETI TION NO; 't 1616 OF 2025
...pETt.oNER(s)
AND
...RESPONDENTS
226 of the consritution of rndia praying that in the .,,",r:;:::: :::;1"'.," the affidavit filed therewith' the High court may be preased to issue a writ, d:rection' more particularlv' one in the nature of writ of mandamrr, 0"",r::1"-::r Ithe action of the respondent authorities in proceeding to take possession of th, subject lands in Sy'Nos'.120 and 121 of Pedda Kanjarra viflage, patancn"rru, ,' that are rn long possession and enjoyment of the petitioners, without ,",,,r,T:: any proceedings under central Act 30 of 20'13 for the subject ands and without u""nn upon the representations submitted by Petitioners seeking the redressal o, the princi p res or nat u ra r,, H: : :: ;:, i"lli . ;,*ii".#r"#"Tm:;:: to dury initiate proceedings under Act 30 of 2013 0r under state amended AcI 21 0f 2017 in case of the lands that are in rong possession and enjoyment of the petitioners in sy Nos- 120 and 121 0f pedda Kanjarra virage, patancheruvu mandal, Sangareddy District, that are required for any public purpose.
IA NO:1OF 2025
Petition under Section- 151 Cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support or*re petiti#il,u'uinf,'corn may be preased to direct the respondent authorities. not to take ,ny t in'J' Jf coercive steps against the petitioners with resoect to , their ,rii".i' runj. "in Sy.Nos.120 and 12t in Pedakanjarla village, patancheruvu Mandar, Sangareddy District as provided in Annexure-1.
Counsel for the Petitioners:SRl.CH RAVI KUMAR
Counsel for theRespondents1,2,4 to 8: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for theRespondentNo.3: V. NARSIMHA GOUDS'C FOR HMDA The Courtmacie the iollowing: ORDER'
D SRIJU STICE c.v.BIIA TIIE HoN'BLE ITIONNo. 116L6of 25 T
ORDER: l'ear nedcounsel for [he petitioners seeks permission of this Court to . thewril petidonwith a liberty to avail the remediesas available withdraw underlaw 1Sdismissed AS libertYassuch,the WritPetition 2. Grantlng arenot entitled to flle any It ismadeclear that the petitioners withdrawn There freshwrit petition on the same cause of acbon' Miscellaneouspetitions pending' if any' shall stand closed
There
/TTRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
3.HYderabad MetroPolitan DeveloPment AuthoritY'ReP bY itsCommissioner Swarna JanYanthiComPlex, Sanjeeva ReddY Nagar'Amee rpet, HYderaba.l- 500038
I
HIGH COURT
, DATED:1tt} tzlzs
liiE S a^1 i4i
I i)'
(
(l' 0 0 sEP 206
.),-
ORDER
WP.No.11616 ot 2O2S
WRIT PETITION IS DISMISSED WITHOUT COSTS
Ayyanna Suvarna
Ayyanna Premila
Errabollasunitha
Ayyanna Srinu
Ayyanna Chandraiah
Ayyanna Subhash
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
