Dismissed

M. Srinivas Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC28 Feb 2025WP/11531/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging a notice demoting the petitioner from Typist to Record Assistant. Counsel sought leave to withdraw with liberty to file a fresh writ petition; the court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition; no costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.

M. Srinivas Reddy Vs The State of Telangana — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰¹ I

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA^KARTHIK

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 11531 O^F218

¶7

Between:

¶8

M.^{Srinivas Reddy,S/o: Late M. Bugganna, Aged about 48rs, Occ Typist} Mandal Praja Pari6hath Narayanpet,^{R76 Narayanpet, Mahabubnagar District}

¶9

,,.PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Rep by^{its Principle Secretary PanchayathRaj} Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad^Telangana.

¶12

2 The CommissioneJ of^{Panchayalhrai, Departmsnl,$s6lst2riatbuilding'} Hyderabad

¶13

3 The Chief Executive Officer,^{Zilla Praja Parishath, at Mahabubnagar}

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 ot lhe^{Constitutionof lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavitfiled therewith,the High Courtmaybe} pleased to issue appropriate orders more^{particularlyone in the nature of writ of} mandamus declaring the action of 3d^{respondentin issuingthe notice vide noticq} no. A2tQ7t2O1B daled 12-03-2018^{to give the willingnesswithin three (3) daysto} demote the^petitioner to the^{post of Record Assistant from the post of typist for non} compliance of the conditions for^{not having higher Telugu gra{etypewriting,} instead of contirruing me as Junior^{Assistant,as juniors to petitioner are continuing} as^junior assistant. Further^{the issuanceof said notice is illegal, arbitraryand} against the GOMS No.^{261 GeneralAdministration(ser.B)Departmentdated '14-} 07-1998 read with A.P^{MinisterialService Rules, 1988(TelanganaAdoption} orde0, 2016 under^(Ru[e 6^{(1) 13).}

¶16

-Tt

¶17

IAN O: 1 OF²⁰¹⁸

¶18

Petrtion rJnder^{Section151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit^{filed in suppo(of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay} allfurtherproceedingsofthirdrespondentnoticeA.2toTt2olSdatedl2.03-2018.

¶19

Counsel for^{the Petitioner:SRI M. VIJAYA KUMAR GOUD}

¶20

Counsel for the^{Respondent Nos.1and 2: GP FORSERVICES-ll}

¶21

Counsel for^{the Respondent No.3: SRIG' NARENDERREDDY' SC FOR ZPP} The Court^{made the following:ORDER}

¶22

¶23

THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶24

WRIT PETITION No.11531 OF 2018

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioner has addressed a letter to the Registrar (Judicial-I) on 25.O2.2025, seeking

¶27

permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a liberty to file fresh Writ Petition

¶28

Permission is accorded

¶29

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. There sha-ll be no order as to costs.

¶30

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, sha-Il stand

¶31

closed

¶32

SD'-P. CH.^N AGABHUSHAMBA A SI TANT REGISTRAR

¶33

/ITRUE^COPY// ECTION^OFFICER

¶34

To, '1 One CC to Sri M. Vijaya Kumar Goud' Advocate IOPUCI 2 rwo ccs to^{GP ror panctlvaT'il';} i]]gr^{o;';lopinent'High court for the} , ar:".t f g L'3 l R';?l Hj'"[1"1" 133i1' ze e lp s u l 4. Two CD^CoPies TJ

¶35