Disposed¶25

M.Ramulu v. Sri.Sabya Sachi Ghosh, I.A.S

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 – Sections 10 to 12

Telangana HC28 Feb 2025CC/2022/2024

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court contempt case closed on compliance: Contempt Case No.2022 of 2024 (decided 28.02.2025, Pulla Karthik J.) under Sections 10-12, Contempt of Courts Act 1971, alleging wilful disobedience of order dated 25.04.2024 in W.P.No.10814 of 2024; compliance reported - petitioner appointed Manager (contract) vide Appointment Letter No.1617/Per.II(B1)/08-Vol.II dated 02.01.2025; case closed without adjudication on merits; respondents: Principal Secretary (Animal Husbandry & Dairy Development) and MD, T.S.D.D.C.F.; no costs, no quantum.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Case closed on reported compliance; no punishment imposed on the respondents; miscellaneous petitions, if any, directed to stand closed. ¶25

M.Ramulu Vs Sri.Sabya Sachi Ghosh, I.A.S — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[3301 ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶6

CONTEMPT CAS E No: 2022 of 2024

¶7

Petition under sections 10 ro 12 of contempt of courts Act 1971 to punish the respondents/ contemnors for their willful, deliberate, disobedience of the orders passed in W.P.No.10B14 of ZOZ4 dated 25_04_2024.

¶8

Between:

¶9

1\1-Ramulu, .S/9, iMrll y.?., A-ge: 49 years, Occ: Contract Manager Grade_ll, workrng at l/ilk chilling centre Narayankhed. Telanqana^"state Dairv Uevetopment tmployees Cooperatrve Federation Limited, Hyderabad.

¶10

... Petitio ner

¶11

,AND

¶12

1 Sn Sabygr Sachi Ghosh, LA.S, Ihe prrncipal Secretary, Animal Husbandrv Diary ll Department. Tetangana, Room.No.33. 2^d Fb:or, Oi g.R ArbeJXli 5ecrelanat tsurldings. Hyderabad.

¶13

Smt.Chittem Laxmi, l.A.S, Managing Drrector, Telangana State Dairv Development. Co-operative Fedeiation Ltd , Vlaya Bhavan, Lalape[, Hyderabad.

¶14

...Respondents

¶15

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Chikkudu prabhakar

¶16

Counsel for the Respondent No..l: Gp FOR SERVICES ll

¶17

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Sri M. Ajay Kumar,

¶18

Standing Counsel for T.S.D.D.C.F

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶21

CONTEMFT CASE No.2O22 0F 2024

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

This Contempt Case is filed, under .section 1O to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 197 1, alleging willful disobedience, pf the order dated 25.04.2024 passed by this Court in W.p.No.lO8l4 of 2024.

¶24

2, When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned <:ounsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 2S_O4.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No. 108i4 of 2024, is complied and the petitioner was appointed as Manager on contract basis vide Appointment l.etter No. 1617 lPer.llBt /O8-Vol.tt, dated 02.Ot.2025.

¶25

o Having regard to the above made submission, this Contempt Case is closed.

¶26

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stancls closed.

¶27

SD/- M. RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

li? SECTION FFICER

To,

One CCto Sri Chikkudu Prabhakar, AdvocateIOPUC] 2 Qne CC to Sri lri'l Ajay Kumar, Standing Counsel for T.S.D.D.C.F tOpUCl 3. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES tl ,High Court for the State of Tetangana tourl 4. Two CD Copies

kanr/l)SL +-

HIGH COURT

DATED:281A212025

ORDER

CC.No.2022 ot 2024

1 riE SIA I4:
os.
)
>
o
2 3 l'lnv 20fr
!oz
t
t)€sparcH