Petitioner sought mandamus directing police to conclude investigation in FIR No.637/2024. Court was informed the investigation had concluded and a charge sheet was being filed. Holding no further orders necessary, the writ petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3166 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Originat Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITI o N NO: 10460 0F 2025
Between:
Sayyed Jitani, S/o. Sayyed Mastan. Aged about 39 years, Occ. Bus,ness, Rio. ptot No.201, Diamon Encrive. Narasimhatoro"y. v S 6iryani co.ner nolo, vairapu. Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
,..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 to 4 in not conducting and concluding the further investigation pursuanl to registration of F.l.R.No.637 of 2024 dared.22r10r2o24 as arbilrary, ilregar. capricious and violative of articles 14. 21 of constitution of lndia including Sec.193 of BNSS and consequently direct the respondents 2lo 4 to take immediate further action pursuant to registration of FIR No,637 of 2024 dated.23l1ot2o24 on the fite of respondents 3 and 4.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.1 0460 of 2025
ORDER
llearcl lcarrrccl Counsel for the pctitioner, the learned Covernment Pleader for Home appearing for the official respondent, and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at admission stage.
2
dt.22.1O.2024, is being lilccl br Lltc responc.lcntstrutltorittc s before the conccrnecl CoLlrt.
3
7 . Accordingiy, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as
to costs
To,
//TRUE COPY//
SD/.K,AMMAJI DEPUTY REGISTRAR
/; SECTIO N/OF FICER
1 One CC to SRt V.V RAMA KR|SHNA, Advocate. tOpUCl 2 Two CCs to Gp FOR HOIME, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies
BSK
LS
4.,. l/
trI"1-4 .h / 4
SISOS INOHIIM Nolilr:ldrluM 3Hr gNlso-l3
gzoz to 09y01'oN'dM u30uo
(j rt i-tlGH C'
"r<br>sJ
.t$
t
\ s
1. t-.
9z0zlv0l80:o3rvo
IUNOC HCIH
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the police inaction in concluding investigation of FIR No.637/2024 was arbitrary and required a mandamus to complete further investigation.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sayyed Jitani
The State of Telangana
The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissionerate
The Station House Officer, Nacharam Police Station
The Sub-Inspector of Police, Nacharam Police Station
T.Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
