Writ petition alleging threat of dispossession from agricultural land at the instance of a private respondent; petitioners sought liberty to withdraw and avail other remedies.
Petitioners granted liberty to avail remedies open to them in law; writ dismissed as withdrawn with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3166 ]
FI
t 1 I
;
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 10 455 0F 2025
Between:
.,,PETITIONERS
AND
..RESPONDENTS
Petition under- Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of [Vlandamus, declaring the action of the responQent Nos. 3 and 4 herein in threatening to dispossess the petitioner from the petitioner,s lawful possession at the behest of respondent No.5 in respect of the my land admeasuring Ac.4.25 gts in sy.No.256/4 situated at Buradaraghavapuram Village, Enkoor Village, Khammam District, without any authority or jurisdiction, as being illegal, arbitrary, u nconstitutiona I and violative of Article 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia.
tt
F t'
;
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased topass orders directing the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to consider the representation of the Petitioner dt.27.02.2025, in pursuance of 1,A.No.655 of 2020 in LA No. 41 ol 2016 in O.S.No.53 of 2016 on the file of the Sub- Divisionai Magistrate and Special Asst to Govt. (Mobile Court) at Bhadrachalam, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: M/S. PILLIX LAW FIRM
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.5:---
f.
The Court made the following: ORDER
I F i
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.1O455 of 2025
ORDER
After making initial submissions, learned counsel lor the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this Writ Petition with liberty to the petitioners to avail the remedies open to them in law
dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
any. shall stand closed .
SD/- K. AMMAJI DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
TJ SS
A$4.
r
F
tF F
F
F
!
HIGH COURT
DATED:0810412025
ORDER
WP.No.10455 oI 2025
:]]-::,-
( ' .) /..
q
oo 2 6 tlAY ?075
t D6'.spArc +(t
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETTTION AS WITHDRAWN
WITHOUT GOSTS
a^.{ )eL9l,{
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Peraboina Appa Rao
Peraboina Bangari
State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department
The Superintendent of Police, Khammam District
The Station House Officer, Enkoor Police Station, Khammam District
The Tahsildar, Enkoor Mandal, Khammam District
T. Vinod Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
