Disposed

K.Bhadru v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC7 Apr 2025WP/10334/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Retired employee sought release of gratuity, commutation, earned leave and GPF amounts not paid after retirement. Government stated bills were processed but funds were short. Court directed respondents to pay the specified retirement benefits within ten weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to release the petitioner's retirement benefit amounts as per listed token numbers within ten weeks; no order as to costs.

K.Bhadru Vs The State of Telangana — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

[³³⁰⁴¹

¶2

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY,^{THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL} TWO THOUSAND^AND IWENTY^FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWARRAO}

¶6

WRIT ETITION N^{O: 10334 OF 2025}

¶7

Bettveen:

¶8

IBlsl'hfl^fl #3Iryf"iil3lsXg"'Xli:Hlfii'85''TH;'dI3]l?#.t{ytri1;" Ramachandrapu, CJr,i.v,-'ii"io"-'tlp^{21'' Bhagathnagar' Karimnagar'} (PPo.No.03-Q2¹ 472tsPl ,,-'I ,.,PETlrloNER

¶9

,.,PETlrloNER

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana,^{rept, py its Spl'Chief PrinqipalSecretary'Finance} ' ,iiJ Fti^i,i"g Depir"iimeht seci6tariat, Hvd-erabad'

¶12

z ' iii. lnsurance biiei;toior Bulldinqs, irddtJriil Abids,^,nd Hyderabad^{Accounti, GoYernmqnt of Telans?na'} s iii. oiittict rieas-urv^offieer, Karimna{iar^district'

¶13

;. +ii; 5;1;-ire'i.-;[,'ffrictii^{ra iimn agat Karim nas ar distti ct'}

¶14

iil;oiiiri"i-dO-u"'aiiphalofficei,Kaiimnesardistrict ...REspoNDENrs

¶15

Petition^{unQerArti-cle} lf6^{of lhe Cplgtitulignqf lndiaprayingthat in the} circumslqngqg^{stqted in} the^{affid-avit file{ thergwith'the High pourt may be} please$ to iQsue an ldel .!|.^{directiQn or writ' morq partllytartyone in the nature of} Writ o{^{rrltandemqq,'deF,!,qre} it"^{lmo'snedgctlqn of the rpspgpdents in- not} retezsing enq^{p"vrog t6.f reliiementO"Tol1 La Grqtuitv 0])^.ernount.o],ns} 1,21'7lit-yry Tofq^{Np'?52Q01sQF5 dt'25'10-2}24'Qratuitv(cs) amountof Rs'} 14,74,2E91-g.ilh .:,,':^{Token No. ?523015069 dt 25-10-2924'Qommutation} "rorni^{ofRs.Z,19,5Q7/-with TokenNo 2523Q15097 d!'25'10-2024'} -(TS) CommUtatiqn(Cs)^{qr-nouqlot Rs25,75,218{- with Token No'?5?30;!5115qt 25-10-} 2o?A, E L 3pou4t ot [q'^{r e,2!,s]1':. nl., t::" No'2F2310 1 70?} 1"' ll-.1a?* and ZP GPF'amqunt^o[ Bs^{O,AO,SZO/- wrth Tokel NqlChequeN-o''J523104.27'21} Dl18-12-20?lisillegal,arbitrary,unfair'unjust'discrimination'apaltfromviolatign of all^{the statutory'Rulesand constitutionalprovisions and consequeqtly directthe} lesponflents^{to release and piy above mentioned be4efits !-o thq petitionerryith}

¶16

interest @ 24^percent per annum from date of retirement to till the date of actual payment is made

¶17

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶18

petition under.Section 1F1 CpC praying that in the circqmstances stated jn the^affidavit fitedⁱⁿ support of tfre pgtitiqn, thq fligh-Court may be grteased tg direct the respondents forthwilh tq release and p?y tfre rptireniqlt benefits of the petitioner $uah as, ie, Gratgity (fS) amBqnt qf RF i,ZO,71!1- wittr Tofiga No.2523015055 dt25-10-2024, Gratuity (Gg) amount of Rs. .14,74.2g9l with Token No. 2523015069 dt 25_10_2024, Commutation (TS) amount ef Rs.2,19,587r with roken No252Q01s097 dl. ?o-1Q-2024, conrmutation (cs) amount of Rs.25.75.218/- with roken No.2Q{3015115 dt25-10-2024, e L amornt of Rs.'t8,22,577t- with To(en Alo.2i29161zge dt 1? -11-2924 and ZF GpE amounl pf Bs Q,83.g20l- wir! rofsn r.rgtchggqe Noi;E|sQgqzt1l Dt 1B_12 Z!r* p."o,n, disposal of fnain writ petilion.

¶19

Counsel for the Pstitiolgf: SFI P.UgEtIDEB REODy Counsel for the Respondent Nos-,1Jg_4iCi FOB'FtNANcE pLANNINc Counsel for the I . , ,. ReEpon4gnt j-l No.s; qe rq8 epUgnrfaN^{-- '-, ,'i"-}

¶20

The Court made the folloqing: ORpER

¶21

t I

¶22

¶23

THE^{HON,BLESRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RA'ESHWAR RAO}

¶24

w PET N No.1 o3^4OF2025

¶25

ORDER

¶26

,^{this Writ Petition is taken} With^{the consentof both the parties} up for^{disposal,at the admission stage'}

¶27

Heard^{Mr' P'Ugender Reddy' learned counsel forthe} petitioner,^{learned Government Pleader for Finance appearing for} respondent^{Nos'1 to 4and learned Government Pleader for} Education^{appearingfor respondentNo'5'}

¶28

3 Learned^{counselfor the petitioner submitsthat the petitioner} retired^{from service on 30'09'2024and till now' his retirement} benefits^{were not released by the respondents'}

¶29

Learned^{GovernmentPleader submitsthat the bills pertaining} totheretirementbenefitsofthepetitionerarealreadyprocessed. However,^{due to dearth of funds' the amounts couldnot be released} to the^{petitioneron time' Learned Government Pleader further} submits^{that as per seriatim of the token numbers' amounts will be} released^{to the beneficiaries'}

¶30

Having^{regard to the above submissions'this Writ petitionis} disposed^{of directingthe respondents to release Gratuity(TS)} amount^{ofRs':,25,7|U- with Token No'2523015055dated}

¶31

1,, -tt11

¶32

25.70.2024, Gratuity (CS) amount of Rs.14,74,289,/_ with Token No.2523015069 dated 25.10.2024, Commutation (TS) amount of Rs.2,19,587 / - with Token No.2523015097 dated .tS.IO.2024, Com m utation (CS) amount of Rs.25,75,2L8/- with Token No.2523015115 dated 25.70.2024, Earned Leave amount oF Rs.18,22,577/- with Token No.25 23t61702 dated 12.1t . 2024 and ZP Gross provi<Jent Fund amount of Rs.6,83,976l_ w,ith Token No/Cheque No.2523504272I dated 18.12.2024, pertaining to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within e pgriod of ten (10) weeks from the date oF receipt of a copy of tris order. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶34

SDi.T. TIFIUMALA DEVI RAR

¶35

To CER 1.

¶36

2 J. 4 5 6 7.

o PS(. BS

CC TODAY

HIGH COURT

DATED:07t04t21?s

ORDER

WP.No.'!0334 of 2025

rE s IAr ('
{"
/tY +
y,
10 AI]il 2[25
j ..1
'. t, ,./'
r:O
.+<br>."- ':. ..;;

¶46

P}SPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶47

,/3
4t
,
/a

K.Bhadru v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Bhadru v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A. Punnam Chand Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Gangubai, Vs State of Telangana

C.Vasantha, Vs The State of Telangana

Peddalinganagari Ramesh Vs Telangana Public Service Commission (Tgpsc)

Madhusudhan Reddy Nukula Vs The State of Telangana

M.Venkata Madhusudhan Rao Vs The State of Telangana