Disposed¶36

A. Sandeep Reddy, v. Madavi Gopal

Telangana HC25 Feb 2025WA/220/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court writ appeal disposed by consent; ex parte Single Judge order in W.P.No.36076 of 2024 (dated 23.12.2024) set aside for want of notice to respondent No.4/appellant; writ petition restored and listed 04.03.2025; natural justice/notice point; Adilabad Municipality and Town Planning Officer parties; Clause 15 Letters Patent; Bench Sujoy Paul ACJ, Renuka Yara J.; decided 25.02.2025; no merits decided; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order dated 23.12.2024 in W.P.No.36076 of 2024 set aside; writ petition restored to its original number and to be listed before the concerned learned Single Judge on 04.03.2025 with the appellant permitted to participate and no separate notice required; appeal disposed of without expressing any opinion on merits; no order as to costs. ¶36

A. Sandeep Reddy, Vs Madavi Gopal — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶36

Issue for consideration

Whether the order dated 23.12.2024 in W.P.No.36076 of 2024, passed by the learned Single Judge without putting the appellant (respondent No.4 in the writ petition) to notice, should be set aside with liberty to the appellant to participate in the writ proceedings.

¶36

Ratio / Principle

On consensus of counsel, the impugned order in W.P.No.36076 of 2024 dated 23.12.2024 is set aside; the writ petition is restored to its original number; the Registry shall list it before the concerned learned Single Judge on 04.03.2025; no separate notice is required to be issued to the appellant and the appellant may participate in the said writ proceedings.

¶36

Key takeaways

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ appeal is disposed of; no order as to costs; miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.ratio¶41

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Appeal (Clause 15, Letters Patent) under W.A.No.220 of 2025, High Court for the State of Telangana (Sujoy Paul, ACJ and Renuka Yara, J.), against the order dated 23.12.2024 of the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.36076 of 2024, which had been passed without putting the present appellant (respondent No.4 in the writ petition) to notice: On consensus between counsel, the Court set aside the impugned order, restored the writ petition to its original number, directed the Registry to list it before the concerned learned Single Judge on 04.03.2025, permitted the appellant to participate without separate notice, and disposed of the writ appeal without expressing any opinion on the merits and without costs; miscellaneous applications stood closed.

¶1

[³⁴⁴⁶¹

¶2

{

¶3

HIGI.I COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWo THoUSAND AND rwer.rri rriE.

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL rHE HoNouRo"r. .#l?srcE RENUKA

¶6

WRIT APPEAL NO:220 OF 202s

¶7

'ARA

¶8

writ Appear under crause 15 0f the Letters patent preferred against the order dated 2311212024 passed in w.p.No-3607 6 0f 20240n the fire of the High court.

¶9

Between:

¶10

Gov Sandeep Reddy, S/o. Rameshwar Reddy, Aoe. 37 years, Occ. ernment Emptoyee, R/o. Dhannui Virrrgr;,'6ilih Gyr?rr, Aditabad District

¶11

AND

¶12

...APPELLANT/4th RESPONDENT

¶13

1 Yi,'"11fr:'S1,,?i?u,Y,"J['lll[ll3;ifrt?-fl"r.Jii,ii,,B;B.By:il]ff ,,*"

¶14

"'RESP.NDENT A/Rlr PETITI.NER

¶15

The state of rerano

¶16

A.i,i,=.'iiiiioi o"p1ft#S,it's"Ti*",.,3il nl:"|,d:E.or,^secretary, vunicipar

¶17

3' Therlvlunicipar councir Adirabad, Rep.by its commissioner, Adirabad, Adirabad

¶18

4' The Town pranning officer, Adirabad Municiparity, Adirabad, Adirabad District.

¶19

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶20

IA NO: 30F 2025

¶21

Petition under section 15 r cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to grant interim suspension of the order passed by the rearned singre judge of this

¶22

Hon'blecourtinW.PN'r36076of2024daled23t12l2124pe'ndingdisposalofthe above writ^{appeal in th': interestof justice}

¶23

Counsel^{for the Appellant:SRI S'SURENDER REDDY} Counsel for^{the Respondent No'1:SRI P'MANI SAHITH' REP' FOR} SRI SOMA^{RAVIKIRAN REDDY}

¶24

Counsel^{for the Respondent No'2:GP FORMCPL ADMNE' URBANDEV}

¶25

Counsel^{for the Respondent No'3 & 4: M/s' GUDIPATISHARVANI'REP'FOR} SNLXRISXruN^{REDDY PUTTA, SC FORMCPL}

¶26

The Court^{delivered the following:JUDGMENT}

¶27

¶28

THE IIOII'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JT'STICE SUJOY PAUL

¶29

AND

¶30

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA

¶31

WRIT APPEAL No.22O of 2025

¶32

ENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujog paul)

¶33

Mr. S.Surender Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant; Sri P.Mali Sahith, learned counsel representing Sri Soma Ravi Kiran Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.1; arrd Ms. Gudipati Sharvani, learned counsel representing Mr. Krishna Reddy Putta, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities, for respondents No.3 and 4.

¶34

With the consent, finally heard.

¶35

¶36

During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties t reached to a consensus. It is agreed that the learned Single Judge has passed the impugned order in W.p.No.360Z6 of 2024, dated 23.12.2024, without putting the appellalt, who is respondent No.4 in the writ petition, to notice and therefore the said order may be set aside and the appellant may be permitted to participate in the proceedings.

r:. .:

In view^{of the consensus arrived at' the irnpugned orderin} W.P.No.3607^{6 of 2024' dated 23'I2'2024' is set aside The said} writ^{petition is restored to its original number'The Registryshal1} list the^{said writ petition beforethe concernedlearned Single} Judge^{on 04} 'O3'2O25'^{No separatenotice will be required to be} issued^{to the appellant herein' The appellantmay participate in} the said^writ Proceedings'

¶41

With the^{aforesaidand withoutexpressing any opinionon} the merits^{of the case,the writ appeal is disposedof' No order as}

¶42

to costs

¶43

MiscellarLeous P^{etitions pending, if any, shall stand closed'}

¶44

SD/- M.^{RAMANA KRIS} A DEPUTY^REG R

¶45

//TRUE^COPY// SECTI N OFFICER

¶46

To, Secretariat, I The Principal^{Secretary, MunicipalAdministratiorL Department} , !X3%3?-r',i's;sioner,^{Municipal councilAdilabad'AdilabadAdilabad District'} 3 rhe Town^{pranning ofn.;:lili;;;irrrt_uniciparitv,ndilabad. AdilabadDistrict.} 4. The Secrion^{Officer, wriiBf5;;6;,'iiGh-i"uriior the Staleof Telansanaat} , iil!"{3:f,S"^{officer, postins section,Highcourt for the stateof retanganaat} . TX3"r*.,?,1;r^{officer, writ Non-ServiceSection' Hishcourt for the stateof} r^{o e u} Ql- -.

¶47

, l";l3 tn8i8^{il'# t13'3R?1,i, rER} EFg^qy, rs.v.oslte ;: 5;; dc i;^{irRi SovrnmVrktRnruRroov.4qv^ogajetoPU-cl..^.} 5. on; ac i" SRi KRrsHNi'REDoV^{purrn, sc FoR IVCPL IoPUCi} io.i*o ccs to GP FOR MCPL ADIUN & URBAN^{DEV, High Court for the State} of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶48