Dismissed

Mirza Mustafa Ali Baig Kamal v. Smt. Azra Shahen W/o. Mirza Mustafa Ali Baig

Telangana HC2 Jul 2025TRCRLP/61/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed Transfer Criminal Petition No. 61 of 2015 as infructuous, quashing the Principal Applicant's request to transfer the Criminal Case from Hyderabad to Jagtial.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of Criminal Case No. 341 of 2014 from XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, to Judicial First Class Magistrate, Jagtial, Karimnagar District.

Mirza Mustafa Ali Baig Kamal Vs Smt. Azra Shahen W/o. Mirza Mustafa Ali Baig — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[³³⁰³¹

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR TH STATE OF TELANGANA

¶3

AT HYDE BAD

¶4

WEDNESDAY,THE SEC ND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AN TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESE T

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUS ICE J SREENIVAS RAO

¶7

TRANSFER CRIMINAL PET TION NO: 61 OF 2015

¶8

Between:

¶9

Mirza Mustafa Ali Baig Kamal, S/o irza Raheem Baig, Occ Teacher, Rl/o Gunj Street, Jagtial Mandal, Karimnag r District

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

Smt. Azra Shahen Wo. Mirza Mustafa li Baig, Occ House Wife, Rio. H. No 5-5-78, Panjesha, Near Charminar, Hy erabad

¶13

The State of Telangana,, Rept. by its P blic Prosecutor, Chambers at High Court at Hyderabad

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Section 447 RM 82 of CR.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be pleased to withdraw and tran fer the CC.No. 341 of 2014 from the Court of the XV Additional Chief Metrop litan Magistrate, at Hyderabad and transfer the same to the Court of the Judic al First Class Magistrate at Jagtiyal, Karimnagar District

¶16

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015 TRCRLPMP. NO: 69 OF 015

¶17

Petition under Section 407(6) R/W 82 of CR.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed n support of the Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further pro edings in CC.No. 341 ol 2014 from the Court of the XV Additional Chief Met opolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad, pending disposal of the main Transfer Crimi al Petition.

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^{perusing the l/emorandum of} Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments^{of Sri ALI} FAROOOUE, Advocate for the Petitioner and Assistant Public Prosecutor,^on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and of Sri. H SUDHAKAR RAO,^{Advocatefor the} Respondent No.1

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. ALI FAROOQUE

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRl. H SUDHAKARA RAO

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

I I

¶24

h H ,b Sri u tlce reenlv Tr s rC a.l etr o.6 of²⁰¹⁵

¶25

Orde^r

¶26

'Ihis Transfer Crimrnal l)ctition is filed^{seeking transfetof}

¶27

Frle of the^{Court o[ the} C.C.No.341^{of 2014,} Pcnding^{on th} Iearned XV^{AdditionalChicf MtropolitanN{agistrateat} I{yderabad^{to the fiie of the (-ourt} I the learned Judicial^F-irst

¶28

Class^{Nlagistrateat} Jagdvai'^Karimna r Districr.

¶29

up lbr^{consideration,} When this^{matter wastak} counsel^rePrcsentlng N{r. Zthatr^{Nladani,lcarned}

¶30

N.{r. r\li^{Farooq,Iearned counselforhc pe titi<>ner,sul>mits that} n docs not^{sun'ive for} the cause^{inthe Crimrnal Periti}

¶31

cons ideraLion.

¶32

ubt:nission,^{this 'Iransfcr} In view of^{the aforesaid}

¶33

Crirninal^{Pctirionis disrnissedas in} ctuous.

¶34

As a scquel,^{miscellaneous} Pe^{tions, Pcnding if anY, stand}

¶35

ckrsed

¶36

SD/. K.AMMAJI DEPUTY^REGISTRAR //TRUE^CO lt SECTION^OFFIGER To, at HYderabad. agistra I The XV^{Additional Chief Metropolitan}

¶37

rj+

¶38

The Judicial Frrst Class Magistrate at Jagtiyal, Karimnagar District.

¶39

The Station House Officer, Women P.S., Charminar, Hyderabad.

¶40

One CC to SRI ALI FAROOOUE, Advocate [OPUC]

¶41

One CC to SRl. H SUDHAKARA RAO, Advocate IOPUC]

¶42

Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana louTl

¶43

Two CD Copies

MKN/PSL

:}^.:;a:.1_ "i

I (

HIGH COURT

DATED:0210712025

ORDER

E ST47
,,-.
k
e
)
| (-')
ID 12 AUE 2025
2y
\1-., ^", 7

¶52

TRCRLP.No.61 of 2015

¶53

TRANSFER CRIMINAL PETITION IS

¶54

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶55

Mirza Mustafa Ali Baig Kamal v. Smt. Azra Shahen W/o. Mirza Mustafa Ali Baig

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mirza Mustafa Ali Baig Kamal v. Smt. Azra Shahen W/o. Mirza Mustafa Ali Baig

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Challa Venkateshwarllu And 8 Others Vs State of Telangana And Another

Jayalaxmi Vs The State of Telangana

Susheel Singh Alias T. Susheel Singh Vs The State of T. S

Rathod Santhosh Sure Vs The State of Telangana

Sri P. Narsimha Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Shaik Jahangeer Vs Smt.Shaik Shabeera Begum