Dismissed

Challa Venkateshwarllu And 8 Others v. State of Telangana And Another

Telangana HC1 Jul 2025TRCRLP/166/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Transfer Criminal Petition sought transfer of C.C.No.672 of 2016 from Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sangareddy to a Magistrate at Kandukur, Andhra Pradesh. The court held it lacked jurisdiction since the destination court lies outside Telangana after the High Courts' bifurcation, and dismissed the petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

Challa Venkateshwarllu And 8 Others Vs State of… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

rN rHE^{HIGH couRr FoR rEEfJiJ= oF TELANGANA}

¶2

TUESDAY,^{THE FIRST DAY OF JULY} nioiHousnND^{AND TWENTYFlvE}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICEJ SREENIVAS RAO}

¶5

TRANSF^{ER CRIMINA} LPETITION^NO:166 OF 2018

¶6

Between:

¶7

1, Challa^{Venkateshwarllu- S/o, Venkaiah.age^d 91 .y"",., occ:Business,R/o.} ' ii,-r l6oia, Vani't'tagar' ranaukur'' Prakasam^District vears'^{occ:Business'R/o 5-}

¶8

, gls: 3"..Hrrff"56:r, ii:, Yill3f xrlt""..:r:l

¶9

cc:^{B usi ness' R/o og uru}

¶10

, VhUts,,,'.!3:Tlli,1# Bli,',"r":

¶11

4 Madala^{Malyadri, S/o' Veeraswamy'aLed ,45, Y-ears 'Occ:Business'R/o'} Mupp^{a raiuvari virrage,M::h;8"" ji'ijiirn "p*t'Kahdukur Mandal' P rakasam} District. *'o

¶12

District. 'o J:-Jgffi^b,s,",& "'"''

¶13

' i;;l*:'l"I;,gfltiir;i: ^,tll?'f,^,i,"xt",i, 6 G. Mallikariuna, Mallikariuna,^{S/o Raghavaiah' Raghavaiah'aged 46 years' R/o Poretipalli 46 years' R/o Poretipalli years' R/o Poretipalli R/o Poretipalli PoretipalliVillage'}

¶14

6 G. Mallikariuna, Mallikariuna,^{S/o Raghavaiah' Raghavaiah'aged 46 years' R/o Poretipalli 46 years' R/o Poretipalli years' R/o Poretipalli R/o Poretipalli PoretipalliVillage'} " Erdi;' Ni;;Ja['prat<asanioistrict'

¶15

'U:nl+r'11X13!ll'Ji','*,[:',31fi^{ii,sffi :,u3,f :$oSt;tcurtivation'R/o} I Balusu Venkat^{Narsimha[LSiq Parvathlu' aged 50 years' Occ Advocate'} " -ni"lxr"orxur, Prakasam District'

¶16

D. Malyadri,^{S/o Kondaiah'.aged 45 years' Occ: Business' R/o 13thWard'} " kanOrftut, Prakasam District ...'ET'T.ONERS/ACCUSED^{1 TO I}

¶17

AND

¶18

1 State of Telangana^{And Another' Rep} '^{by its Publi-cProsecutor' High Court of} Judicature^{at Hvderabad t"iiii6si"iE biielanganaAnd the Statae of Andhra} Pradesh,^HYderabad

¶19

K. Srinivasa^{Rao, S/o' NarasimhaRao' aged 43 years' Occ: Business'Rio 9-} 1 -4s t 1 4,Y RK^Complex,' 'A!^r vrqrr^{ti' Li'} I''LlnE-sCdr.roENT/iiEFAcro^{n"io' t-+g-gl-tqy3'Hvdera bad} coMPLAINANT

¶20

Petition under^{Section407 of Cr.P C prayingthat the reasonsstatedin the} ,""o.p"nVlng^{affidavit,that this HoibleCourt may be pleased} .t?..3'd"' withdrawal of cc^{No. an ot )orcfromthe file of the court of learned Additional} irii"iri rtrrgi.trate^{of rirsi ctass, Sangareddy. and transferthe same for trail} "nJ^{Oi.po.r'i to the courtof any of the [earned Judicial Magistrateof First Class} "t^{krnirkrr.for trial and disposal in accordance with law}

¶21

t.A. NO:10F 2018

¶22

"oo^{T,,'t'.ti"J jii,::lnT;}, ,!o!tul or cr p c prayins that in the circumstances gieaseo ,o oio!,'L1v'oI!J ,tii|B[:JJ.i[.1.",t"J_,nl;'l, t ff #ili: s^istra te or i i oi ci ; ;." ; : H:.:i'E ffi !. ;: J:::l :+ .ti'l'.,TSL/ H,,:#,X "^s,

¶23

This Petition comino on f^r h6o,i^^ ..- _ sffi #: T:' ffi^' [:' :"'ffiTi: "J',:l ^^{# u#* ::::fi "ff;} petitioner ano rre ror the " Respondenr No 1 and or "J;llTI$:,":'?:"i"J:gr"presenr),Advocate None app"r*0 il#"lr:,"T"TJ) on beharr of the

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶25

I t

¶26

I I

¶27

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE J'SREENTVAS RAO} TRANSFER C^{RIMINALPETITION No.1 66of20ra.}

¶28

ORDER..

¶29

This Transfer^{Criminal Petition is filedseekingtransfer of} C.C.No.672^{of 2016 pendingon the hle of the learned Additional} Judicial^{Magistrate of FirstCiass' Sangareddy'to the Court of any} learned^{JudicialMagistrate of First Classat Kandukur'}

¶30

taken uP^forheanng 2. When this^matterwas learned^{counselfor the} oo 26.06.2025,^{atthe request of} petitioners^{the matter was directed to be iisted on 27 '06 '2027 for} getting instructions^{whether the cause in the present petition} survivesornot.However,todaythereisnorepresentationon behalf of^{both parties either in physical modeor in virtualmode'}

¶31

A perusal^{of the recordgoes to show that this Transfer} Criminal^{Petition was irled after bifurcation of the erstwhile State} of Andhra^{Pradesh, ort 26'07 '2018' before the combinedHigh} Court^{of Judicature for the State of Telangana and the State of} Andhra^{Pradesh and from1st January' 2019'two separate High} Courts^{for the respective States have been reconstituted as High} CourtforthestateofTelanganaandHighCourtofAndhra Pradesh^{at Amaravathi' As the petitioners are seekingtransfer of} C.C.No.672^{of 2016, pending on the hle of the learned Additional} Juclicial^{Magistrate of First Class, Sangareddy, to the Courtof any}

----

learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Kandukur, which is situated in the territory of the State of Andhra pradesh, this Court does not have the jurisdiction to transfer the same.

¶36

In view of the same, the Transfer Criminal petition is dismissed. However, the parties are gralted liberty to avail their remedies as available under law

¶37

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand

¶38

closed.

¶39

Sd/- L. LAKSHMI BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR

¶40

To,

¶41

//TRUE COPY//

¶42

\ \ SECTION OFFICER \i

¶43

The Additionar Judiciar Magistrate of First crass, sanga reddy, Sanga reddy District

¶44

The Judicial lvlagistrate of First Class at Kandukur, prakasam District

¶45

The Station House Officer, Sangareddy Town police Station , Sanga reddy, Sanga reddy District

¶46

One CC to SR NIMMAGADDA SAryANARAYANA Advocate IOPUCI

¶47

Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶48

Two CD Copies

VM/PSL

I i I I i I

IIIGH COURT

DATED: OltOZtzO2S

ORDER TRCRLp.No.16 6 of 2018

¶54

-'- - -- :==-=-':'
,a- - -:: t[-, ':<br>J, j 't
I .- .<br>I ii
i'
21 I|JE zffi
0 T ,,,
I I OgSp -')/

CRIMINAL^PETfiION

lHE^IRANSFER

DISTilISSING

Challa Venkateshwarllu And 8 Others v. State of Telangana And Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Challa Venkateshwarllu And 8 Others v. State of Telangana And Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sajjad Ali Khan Vs The State of Telangana

Lt Col P Ram Prasad Raju Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Gone Nikhitha , Sirisala Rajani Vs The State of Telangana

Jayalaxmi Vs The State of Telangana

Susheel Singh Alias T. Susheel Singh Vs The State of T. S

Jarupula Mohan Vs The State of Telangana