Dismissed

National Insurance Co. Ltd., Karimnagar and Another v. Banothu Ravi , Ravinder Naik and Another

Telangana HC23 Jan 2025MACMA/546/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Insurance company's appeal against a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award was placed before the Lok Adalat; the insurer chose not to pursue the appeal and withdrew it. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, confirming the tribunal's decree.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; tribunal decree confirmed; unpaid award amount payable within one month with interest; court fee refunded; no costs.

National Insurance Co. Ltd., Karimnagar and Another Vs Banothu… — Insurance | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

oF TELANGANA rN rHE^H|GH "o'*If3$otffoB',ffE

¶2

THURSDAy ,rHE^{TWENTY ri'ino DAY of JANUARY} " '" TWo iHousnuo AND TWENTY FlvE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEN'TUKARAMJI}

¶5

M.A.C.M.^{A. NO:546OF 2013}

¶6

Appeal^{Under Section 173 of M'V'Act against,the decree and orderdated} 2s-1o-2oo7^{in M.V.o'P'No'1';i'g;i;ffion tttt".1" of the Courtof the Chairman'} Motor Accident^{claims rriuJilrlcrr- tv Additional DistrictJudge,warangal'}

¶7

Between:

¶8

National^{lnsuranceCo Ltd} '^{Karimnagar' .Rep by} 'its^{DivisionalManager} Divisional^{office at r Fr"ooi z-b-ro:'Muiicipal office Karimnagat}

¶9

- National 12=2t1, J.P.N.^{lnsurance Road, Co' Warangal'Ltd',} B"p^{ny its Branch l\ilanager Branch Officeat 8-}

¶10

...APPELLANTS/^{R.2 & R.3}

¶11

AND

¶12

Banothu Ravi @^{Ravinder Naik, S/o BanlyaLabour R/o Gundla Singaram} Villaoe. Hanamkonda^{lVlanoailiw;;;"g;i oistrict ( R-'1 dismissed for default} vide"Court Order^{dated 27-9-2011)}

¶13

2 Mohd. Siddiq^{(tVajor),S/o. Mohd. Hussain} '- -^{Bus11qs9.{o6-1-6'Ashok Nagar'} Karimnagar. "'nESpONDENT/^{Petitioner& R -1}

¶14

LA. NO: 2^{OF2008 (MACMAMP.NO:3098OF2008)}

¶15

Petition under^{Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated} in the^{grounds filea in supiort of the UACHin,l''"High CourtmaY} !e^o]9as3o.to passed in Op No^{t OSglZ006 dated 29'10 2007 on the file of the} riry tf,"" "rO"t Chairman, Accidents^{Claims TribunalcumlV Addl District Judge' Warangal}

¶16

Counsel for^{the Appellant:SRI' N' MOHAN KRISHNA}

¶17

Counsel for^{the ResPondents:}

¶18

The Court^{deliveredthe following Judgment:}

! I

HIGH COURT

DATED:2310112025

JUDGMENT

MACMA.No.546^{of 2013}

¶24

s1.., --'.
(
(
:l t1
o 2 3 Af'lr 2[25 t:
c
-i
t DEspatc

¶25

DISPOSING OF^{THE MACMA} INTERMS OF^{THE AWARD} WITHOUT COSTS

r) ,e
Yt^,
\o\J'

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶30

I'{IGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMAAITTEE

¶31

(HIGH COURT FOR THE 5TATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD)

¶32

[under^section 19 of the Legal servicesAuthorities Act, 1987 (cenrral Act)]

¶33

Date:14-1 2-2024

¶34

Present:1 . Hon'ble Mrs. Justice S.Nanda,

¶35

(Judge, Hon'ble High Court for the State of Telangana) Chairman

¶36

Sri K. Venkatesh Gupta, Advocate, Member

¶37

Sri Srinivasa Srikanth, Advocate, Member

¶38

M.A.C.M.A.No.546 of 2013

¶39

(Before the Hon'ble High Court)

¶40

AGAINST

¶41

M.V.O.P.No.1039 of 2006

¶42

(On the fite of the Chairman, Motor Accident Ctaims Tribunat -Cum-lV-additionat District Judge :: Warangat)

¶43

Between:

¶44

National lnsurance Co Ltd, rep. by its Divisionat Manager, Divisional Office at 1st ftoor, 2-6-103, Municipat Office, Karimnagar.

¶45

National lnsurance Co Ltd, rep. by its Branch Manager, Branch Office at8-12-2/1, J.p.N. Road, WarangaI

¶46

...Appettants/ R-2 & R-3

¶47

AND

¶48

Banothu Ravi @ Ravinder Naik, S/o Bandya, Age: 31 years, Occ:Labour, R/o Gundta Singaram Vitlage,

¶49

Hanamkonda Mandal of

¶50

WarangaI District.

¶51

(R1-Dismissed for defautt vide court order, dt.Z7-09-2011)

¶52

Mohd. Siddiq S/o Mohd.Hussain. Age: Major, Occu: Business, Rlo 6-1-6, Ashok Nagar, Karimnagar.

¶53

...Respondents/ Petr & R-1

¶54

AWARD

¶55

'1. This is an appeal fited by the Appettant/ lnsurance company chattenging the order dated 08-05-2006 passed in op.No.1039 of 2006 by the chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribuna[ -Cum-lV-additionaI District Judge at Warangat.

)

I I ii I I I I

I 'I i I

2' 5ri N.Karunakar, Regionat Manager the authorized representative o_f r'1 Appettant/lnsurance Company, has appeared and represented that the lnsurance Company decided not to p!rsue the present appeat and therefore they are withdr awing the appeat.

¶62

The said representation is recorded and the appeaI is dismissed as withdrawn, confirming the judgment and decree of the Court/Tribunat below. The amount, if any, remaining unpaid to the,:[aimant(s) shatt be deposited by tl-g In5gpsnce Company within one month from the date of receipt of the award, along with interest.

¶63

on such deposrr, the Responden t/ Ctaimant(s) is/are permitted to withdraw his/her/their respective amount/s as per the awerrd passed by the Tribunat/MACT.

¶64

ln case, the parties subsequentty come to know about filing of cross appeat/cross o5jection, they are given tiberty to :ieek recatt of this Order/Award.

¶65

Court fee paid on this appeal shatt be refunded.

¶66

No costs.

¶67

E ieraa 5.eIan
For NATIONAL INSU
ofirg;a
Authorise d Signatory
Appeltant/R-2 & R-3
lnsurance Com pany
Nor,, ,!,r^J^
'.--=-ffia"- t t99/-".-
MEMBER MEMBER
Z
tee
*l
cl1

National Insurance Co. Ltd., Karimnagar and Another v. Banothu Ravi , Ravinder Naik and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

National Insurance Co. Ltd., Karimnagar and Another v. Banothu Ravi , Ravinder Naik and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kontham Padma, and 4 others Vs Nagam Muthyam Reddy and 2 others

Lunavath Balya and 8 Others Vs The State of Telangana and 15 Others

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Vs Samineni Seethamma

Vattipalli Muralaiah Vs Singam pedaiah

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs Bhukya Saroja and 3 Ots

The Managing Director, Apsrtc, Vs Ummineni Mariyamma and 2 Others