Disposed

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Bhukya Saroja and 3 Ots

Telangana HC23 Jan 2025MACMA/1716/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Insurer appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award. The appellant withdrew its contention before the Lok Adalat on 14.12.2024; the High Court disposed of the appeal in terms of the Lok Adalat Award dated 14.12.2024, effectively confirming the Tribunal's order.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed in terms of Lok Adalat Award dated 14.12.2024 confirming the Tribunal order; no costs.

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs Bhukya Saroja and 3 Ots — Insurance | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

13217 |

¶2

IN '' THE HIGH^{COURTFORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY,^{THE TWENW THIRDDAY OF JANUARY} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTYFIVE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI}

¶6

MOTOR ACCI DENT CIVIL MI^{SCELLANEOUS APPEAL} NO: 1716 0F 2013

¶7

Appeal filed under^{Section 173 of Motor vehiclesAct} '^{againstthe Judgment} and aeciJe,^{made in tu v.o.F.uo.+z 4 of 2O1Odated' 27 '10'2011 on the file of the} chairman, Motor^{Accident claims Tribunal(special sessionsJudgefor Trialof} "ri"i^{,n0"1. SCs and STs (pOA) Act,'i989-cum-Addl. District Judge) at} Khammam.

¶8

Between:

¶9

The New lndia Assurance^{Company Limited Jep by its Branch Manager'Branch} Office, Prasad^{Mansion,1'' Floor' Powerpet, t'luru'}

¶10

...APPELLANT/2,d^ResPondent

¶11

AND

¶12

Bhukya Saroja,^{D/o late Amriya, aged 25 years, Occ:Nil}

¶13

Bhukya^{Padma, D/o late Amriya, aged 23 years, Occ:Nil}

¶14

Bhukya Rambai,^{D/o late Amriya, aged 21 years' Occ:Nil}

¶15

Resoondentslto3areresidentsofBadavath_ThandaVillageofChunchupalli FirIr'Jvjt, kothagudem^{Mandal, Khammam District'}

¶16

RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

¶17

Smt. Gunda Saritha,^{Wo. JithenderRlgddy' aged..Major'Orcc: Owner of LorU} ' n'."ii* n"oiitia.on ruo Ap_zow-2028, r/6. Mondikunta village, Aswapuram Manda].^{Kh-ammamDistrict.}

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Counsel for the^{Appellant:SRl. NARESH BYRAPANENI}

¶20

Counsel for^{the Respondents 1 to 3: SRI' V BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY}

¶21

Counsel for the^{Respondent No'4: SRI MOHAMMEDABDUL SALEEM}

¶22

The Court delivered^{the following:JUDGMENT}

¶23

¶24

THE^].{ONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJII

¶25

¶26

M.A.C .M.A. No.1716 O F 2013

¶27

JUDGMENT:

¶28

This crppeal has been filed by the New India ,\ssurance Company Lin ited, EIuru/respondent No.2 aggrieved by the order dated 27.7O.2011 in M.V.O.P.No.424 of 2010 passed by :he Motor Accident Clainrs^-Iribunal (Special Sessions Judge for Tria of Cases under SC's an^j Sl's (POA) Act, 1989-cum-Additional Distrtct Judge) Khammam.

¶29

Heard.^)erJsed the materials on record.

¶30

On 14.7.t.2024, the appellant had withdrawn the conr.ention in the Appeal beiore' Lok Adalat. In effect, the impugned ordr3r stands confirmed.

¶31

In view, of the development, the M.A.C.M.A. is dispo:;ed of, in terms of the A'varc dated 14.12.2024.

¶32

The Reg istr), is directed to annex a copy of th3 Awa rd

¶33

dated 74.72.:)-(24 t.o this judgment. No order as to costs.

¶34

As a seq tel pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall

¶35

stand cl

¶36

Sd/. N. SRIHARI ASSIS IA NI REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SecrroN oFFrcER

¶37

¶38

The chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special Sessions Judge for Trial of cases under SCs and STs (POA) Act, 1989-cum.Addl. District Judge) at Klrammam.

¶39

One CC to {iRI NARESH BYRAPANENI Advocate [OPUC]

¶40

¶41

3 Qne CC to SRI MOHAMMED ABDUL SALEEM, Advocate [OeUCl

¶42

¶43

1. One CC to SRt V BRAHMATAH CHOWDARY, Advocate tOpUCl

¶44

Two CD Copies

¶45

___11

¶46

''^-fl-r ': '!f t,-i , .lri' ,

¶47

¶48

Enclosing^{alongwith a copy olLokAdalatAward}

'\9

I I I I

HIGH COURT

DATED:23 tO1t2O2S

, ,

JUDGTvIENT

MACIIT|A No. 1716 of 2013

¶59

oo) 0l :. r..lti
.t1)1:; , f it

¶60

DISPOSED, OFF tN TERMS OF LOK ADALAT AWARD

*:.
,}i)f

BEFORE H,GHcoCOURr URT FOR IHE[EGAt THE LOSERVICESK ADAcoi4tttLAT of th 9rArE oF IELANGA TTEE e legal Services AuthoritiNA, HYDE RAEAD) es Act 1987 (Centra Date ct)J 14-12- 2024

¶65

1una". su.ti#'ff
SEP.V
ct .':,1i
*t'
O rsl[sIF
slzie g',

¶66

Present:1. Hon,ble l,lrs. Justice S.Na nda

¶67

(Judge, High Court for the State of Tetangana)
Chairma n
2. MemberSri K.Venkat esh Gupta, Advocate,

¶68

, ,;'#:l** srikanth, Advocare,

¶69

MACMA No, 1716of2013

¶70

a/,2

¶71

(Before the Hon 'ble High Court)

¶72

AGAI NST (On the fite of the Chai o.P.No.424of 2010 rman, ^,1.V.Motoi Accide Judge for Triat ofcases under SCs and 5Ts(POA) nts Claims Act, Tribu1989nat (Speciat Sessions -cum-Addt. District Judge) at Khammam)

¶73

Between:

¶74

#i,.r",;#iiilfl Fm:.:.,",j#,:r,*,i

¶75

...Appeltant/ 2no Respondent

¶76

]^{iI,:.P:iV::t;,'Ji;,,ii:o,n,,,} .. :!y1y1l39ra, D/o. Late Amriya, '.-Aged: 23 years. Occ: Ntr D/o' laienmriva'

¶77

' illflifi,Tli';

¶78

AND

¶79

f{3#l#},*,#.',:ffi^{iH'.',,T,'"11'-l:,':,r::JT:ff} ,,

¶80

Smt. Gunda Saritha. W/o-

¶81

...Respondents/petitioners

¶82

IF^;s'dil;[T:ifrii*i?:i:i'"xi.o!',i",o..,,,"" Aswa p u ra m,ril,ol i, xilii'l"j#fi :,Illilt",

¶83

...Respondent/1.t Respondent

\ysv/----- Lry*=

l}.

AWARD

't. This i: an appeal This i: an appeal i: an appeal an appeal appeal fited by the Appettant/lnsu

¶89

't. This i: an appeal This i: an appeal i: an appeal an appeal appeal fited by the Appettant/lnsu 27 1 o -20

¶90

;:H .::':,:., 1 1 passed in ""' #:::^t:ffi 'l;":;:'T.::: *;", "0",

¶91

, il' . I T. :r#.I iH;:T::i.::il:^J:::; J;,,_# 'i::'T::,:,:ff h:",fl

¶92

** : i;mj#fl x;'ilrff present appeat and therefore

¶93

they arc withdrawing the appeal.

¶94

The sa d represen withdra,vn, ."rr,rrlll''"1" is recorded and the appeat is dismissed as the judgment and de

¶95

berow.^'-he urorn,,'nt of the court/Tribunat

¶96

. fu.u,o, deposite^o.," J by^{u..0,l';["-ilT,]:Jilf':.: j::;':,:;'1': H:} the ,n; "^tn'remaining "o",Ttt""^:;

¶97

On such rleposit, tt," n".^^^r^--,:.'-".. hiszherit,relr";;,;::,1""'r::.:.nt/craimantG)is.

¶98

_ rrrounal/r4AcJ.. r.rve drDoUDt/s u, ,u. ,lltu.permilted u*u'o to e withdraw
-""'u pass € d by th ce
5' ln case, .he oarties
appear/crcss ooju.,,o-"lluquentty come to n,'=
orderlAwa.d. n' thev .'" ,;;";;;,'- about fiting of cross
o "" (ruerty to seek recall of this
6. court fee plid on this aone^r.^_,, .
- "- 'ppea( shat{ be refunded.
7. No costs.
.##^mffi^**r 6
UO Ltd lir
ft{+{-d
icfd,qRr
Appell an spondeATTORNgWnt
lnsurance Com
n
-J.
fl,, rlJ"
CHAIR,AlAN
BER
Yv-rr=-'
rj Me,(eeh
of the
Ir tee)
l
t) +l
i

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Bhukya Saroja and 3 Ots

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Bhukya Saroja and 3 Ots

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kontham Padma, and 4 others Vs Nagam Muthyam Reddy and 2 others

Lunavath Balya and 8 Others Vs The State of Telangana and 15 Others

The New India Assurance Company Limited, Vs Samineni Seethamma

Vattipalli Muralaiah Vs Singam pedaiah

National Insurance Co. Ltd., Karimnagar and Another Vs Banothu Ravi , Ravinder Naik and Another

The Managing Director, Apsrtc, Vs Ummineni Mariyamma and 2 Others