Insurance company's appeal and claimants' cross-appeal against a motor accident compensation decree were referred to Lok Adalat, where parties settled for a total of Rs.11,00,000/- towards full and final settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s3 ]
IN THE HIGHCOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAYOF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICEM.G.PRIYADARSINI
M.A.C.M.A.NOs: 3514 OF 2011AND5020F2014
Appeals filed under Section 173of Motor vehicles Act.'against the Judgment and decree, made in O.P.NO.923of 2009 dated. 08.09.2011 on the file of the chairman, Motor Accident claimsTribunal-cum-special Sessions Judgefor trial of SCs/STs (POA) cases-cum-AdditionalDistrictJudge,Nalgonda
M.A.C.M. NO: 3514 OF 011
Between:
lClCl Lombard General lnsuranceCompany Ltd., Rep. by its LegalOfficerH.No. 3-6-365/4/8, Ground Floor,SamaTowers Opp Stanza, LibertyCirlceHimayath Nagar, Hyderabad 500 029
...APPELLANT/R2
AND
...RESPONDENTS/Petrs.1 to 5 & R-1
/
MACMAMP. NO: 5409 OF 2011
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to stay of execution of the decree and all furtherproceedings passed in OP.no. 923 of 2009 dt. 08/09/2011 on the file of the Chairman, MACT-cum-Special Sessions Judge for Trial of SCs / STs (POA) Act Cases-cum- Additional District Judge, Nalgonda
MACMAMP. NO: 5248 OF 2012
Between:
...PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENTS NO-1 TO 5
AND
...RESPONDENTS/Petrs.'l to 5 & R-1
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate lhe stay order granted on9-12-2011 in MACMA MP No 5409 of 201'1 in MACMA tt/P No. 3514 of 2O11.
M.A.C.M.A,NO: 5020F 2014
Between:
Petitioner No.2 being minor rep. by her mother and Natural guardian, Badhuta Jyohti @ Rajitha, 1"t Petitioner herein.
[PetitionerNo.5 being minor rep.by her mother and Natural guard ian, Badhula Uma Rani, 4h Petitioner hereinl
All are F/o. Kapriaipally Village of Athmakur mandal, Natgonda District Presently residing at Gandhi Nagar, Nalgonda Town and District.
...PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS
AND
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellant in MACMA 3514 0F 2011 : SRI. RAVI SHANKAR JANDHYALA
Counsel for the Respondents I to 4 in MACMA 3514 of2011 and Petitioners in 502 ol 2014 i SRt. M RAJAMALLA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.2 in MACMA.NO.502OF 2014 : SRI RAMA CHANDRA REDDY GADI
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
/
THE }{ON,BLESMT.IUSTICL, M.G.PRIYAI)AI(SI\I MACIvlA No.3514 1ad 2ot 2074
CON,IM N D(;MENT:
2 Sincc, thcappellantin both the appeals are one and the same' thcy hearrl togetlrer.rrrd clisPosrt" oi by wav of this common iudgment'
bC t.l()()rderas t() CrrStS.
I As a scelLIcl,nlisct'llaneous aPPlications'if any' pentling shall siantl
c Iuscti
AS
*rt^{i'*1#,t?EiF I
//TRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
-SpecialSessions Judge
Yt
Pr
HIGH COURT DATED: 0710212025
COMMON JUDGMENT MACMA.No.3514 ot 2011 AND 502 0F 2014
\ o\
-=-_<br>'r{"- ST4; €
,/) // t<br>3 0 APn 2025
t t
Dt SparCtt gO "r/
DISPOSING OF THE APPEALS IN TERMS OF LOK ADALAT
AWARD WITHOUT COSTS.
+.fu Y\ 16r',
1
--7
/'
<br>
BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGALSERVICESCOMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA,HYDERABAD.
[UnderSeclion l9 of lhe Legol Services Aulhorilies Act,'1987(CenkolAct)l
Date:14-12'2024
Present:1. Hon'ble Mrs. JusticeS.Nanda,
E:n
at
oo HIGts' fl$L'rtcou11
LOK
t "#
ihe Sitie ri1 o-*
(Judge, H;ntble High Court for the Stateof Telangana) Chairman 2.Sri K.Venkatesh GuPta, Advocate, Member 3.Sri Srinivasa Srikanth,Advocate, Member
MACI(A.No.35'14 of2011 & lvlACi{A No. 502 of 2014 (Before the Hon'ble High Court)
MACMA.No.3514 of 2011
AGAINST
O.P. No.923 of 2009
(On the fite of the Chairman, M.A.C.T.,(Additionat DistrictJudge) (Spt. Sessions Judge for SC/STs(POA) ActCases At Natgonda)
Between:-
lClCl Lombard Generatlnsurance CompanyLimited, H. No. 3-6-365/A/B/, GroundFtoor,SamaTowers, Opposite Stanza, Liberty Circle,HimayathNagar, Hyderabad- 500 029, representedby its Legal Officer.
...APPellant/ResPondentNo. 2
AND
si
+\
2
<br>
(Respondent No.2 being minor represented
Badhula Jyothi @ Rajitha, Respondent No.,l herein)
(Respondent No.5 is being minor represented
.....Respondents/Petrs. 1 to 5 & R-1
MACMA.No.50 2 of 2014
*m
6e stste
3
'r\ t{ llt
A[[ are r/o. Kaprioaipatlyvittage,Athmakur {andat, Natgonda Districtprerntty residing at Gandhi Nagar, Natgonda Townand district'
...pertroners/Appe*ants
AND
(Owner of the Auto bearingNo.AP'24'W'82921
......ResPonde nts/ResPondents
Counsel for Ctaimants/Petitioners/Appettants:Sri M.RajamattaReddy' Advocate/Sri G. Sravan Kumar,Advocate
Counsel for Respondent/ lnsurance Company: Sri RamachaMraReddy Gadi, Advocate Representative of Insurance Company : Sri lrlohanrmedAMu[Shabbeer, Senior Alanager- Legat Claims
These appeats having been referred for sett{ernent before this LokAdatat and after hearing the Learned Counse[ for theparties and atso theparties,the fottowing award ispassed:
AWARD
Compensation Rs.6,00,000/-(Rupees Six lakhs onty) with interest at 6% per Awarded annum from the date of the fiting of the petition titt the date by the Tribunal of reatization. Compensation lAACllA.No.3514 of 2011 has been.preferred by the lnsurance Awarded Company and MAClvlA.No.502 of 2014 has been preferred (kttlement Reached) in the Lok Adatat. by the Respondent l$o,2/lnsurance Company against the Consti MVOP No. 92i of 2009. Sri Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer, Senior Manager-Legat Ctaims HIGH COURT for the Respondent No.2-lnsurance Company has appeared LOK AO/ LAT before the Lok Adatat. The Appettant/petitioner/Ctaimanr 'i5il Nos.1 to 5 atong with their counsel have appeared before
vpz=-
CEr scannedwith OKEN Scanne
tlie l'lrcltt ir t Li.ea[ Services C . ll;1t lluring t,lr. t)"ri(l,rt](.!' of thesC Appr:atS, Petitiorrr"rs,'Clarrr)., t5'ts vzell a: ResJ.rrlndent Colttpartv llavc cr)teted into a setllem€,rl dnd ' .. i. l I I . -: .: '.. :,:. ja; ^.i,.i. l() rcccrY(.';rn ar|olrnl of Rs.11,00,000/. {Rupees onty) towards {utt and final seltlcrnr:.t1. of t addition to [lle amou t atreacly LOn pany as o e compromlse rs recorded and the mattet. is setr-led Lok Ad.ri.rt. .: ':
ln view of Lhe above settlement. the lnsurance Co deposrt the settied amount within one 11t month fi of receipt of copy of Awarc,, after deducting the was deposited, rf any. ln thc event of defauit making such dcpcsit, the amount pavable sha[[ c .u:l.fd"d by rhc Tr rbun,.rt. of Thc apportronrlc:t anrong thc AppclL ant i Petition ' l.,ios.1 to 5 shal be macje as per rhe te 'nrs cf the a in OP.No.92l of 20C9 by thc Tribun rl. rection .L
$iji'l1
AppqrJionment of
ts'are entitied to the relun.t of CoLrrt Fc,c pa r(i rn thl"! appeal., ady dc.posited by t lr.' lnsilr altae Conr1tart,,, tt .rt.:r,, shatI Insurarrce C L,rr rp,11 ,;,. t1.,,n,.tl.). ,\11,,:lt.rnt/pet to li arL. pi.r n )lttc.d t() wjthrJrav/ tlt(,ir slr nQr Ai)1,r. li 1' t, t,i.l ittoner ,,Ctarrrtant No. Z s it.rll tr.' 1i111t ij1 fix lJ;tl! 1,, ,.,,, ilt,llr! ln;rJ(l ity, ,t\ l)L.r tlu, ,_ri1l;.1.5 6l 1ftg ln toke Orlsr:tlI f() I r,.,., have sign ta atd|)|.,
r,ft:qr
I
a'\t</sup> ".\a ' 'vq
t"/.,, /r ot{r
Respondent (s)
APpe a nt ( S )
g s b'trit>'
Jov. br t--.-rt !! )
Vr-,l',.. ,/
B.t'fSe'
.'r: i ;::' rri-:-.:.: -
A.lr
Se /
(. la^rt o*',.'
( Lm'
s b,%-
V---:3-.--
/ ^ )-'
l-' r /^ ' ^ '1 -'"1) Counsel for the ResPondent (s)
Counsel |or ii" aPPertunt ttt
t.t
c.>\ qol,o
a. MEMBER
Ll-
W',--
HAI R}AAN
i
s'til1r
(^E: Scanned with OKENScanne
1 provisions across 1 enactments
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd.
Badhula Jyothi @ Rajitha
Badhula Swathi
Badhula Somaiah
Badhula Mallamma
G. Venkatadri
M.G.Priyadarsini
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
