Disposed

Anumalla , Anumandal Ramesh, Karimnagar Dist 7 Anr. v. M.Raju, Karimnagar Dist and 2 Others

Telangana HC4 Mar 2025MACMA/2866/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Motor accident appeal against tribunal award in MVOP No.10 of 2014 was settled before Lok Adalat for Rs.3,00,000 in addition to amounts already deposited, with apportionment per the tribunal award.

What did the court decide?

Appeal disposed in terms of Lok Adalat Award; insurer to pay Rs.3,00,000 within one month after crediting deposits; refund of court fee permitted.

Anumalla , Anumandal Ramesh, Karimnagar Dist 7 Anr… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

l { j i I

¶2

[³²⁵³¹

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTTCE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶7

MOTOR ACCIDE NT CIVIL MISCELLAN EOUS APPE AL NO:2866 oF 2016

¶8

Appeal filed Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act,19gg against the order and decree in M.V.o.P.No.10 of 2014 dated. 09-03-2016 on the filJof the court of the lll Additional District Judge-cum-chairman, Motor Vehicle Accidents Tribunal, Karimnagar.

¶9

Between:

¶10

Anumalla @^Anumandal Ramesh, S/o. Narsaiah, Age 45 years, Occ: Business

¶11

Anumalla. _^{@.. Anumandal prameela,W/o. RameshAge 40 years,} Occ Household, Both R/o. tl.No. 9-60, Ganesh Naar, Chopp"adanai^'ViGg'e inO Mandal in Karimnagar District-

¶12

...Appellants/Petitioners

¶13

AND

¶14

Mudham-Raju, S/o. Sambaiah, _Age 25 years, Munnurukapu R/o. Rampur Village of Huzurabad rown and Manda[in Karimnagrar Diitrict ( orivei'ii r_orrv bearing No- AP 36 X 3489)

¶15

Bashampalli grinivas,.S/o.^parvathalu, Age 39 years, Rt/o. H.No. 2_235, -

¶16

Bhimaram.Vitta.ge_oJ lgsalpg(hy Mandal in Wirangat OistriCt, lOrivei bt Lorry bearing No AP 36 x 3489)

¶17

lclc LOMBARD Generar rnsurance company Limited, Represented bv its Divisional Manager, tCtC LOMBARD Horise, +t+, Veer Sdva*ir Ir4ir6. f1"", Sddi Vinayaka Temple,^prabhadevi Mumbai, Maharastra State _ +OO diS'-(ln_s^uranffr Policy No_ 3003/TMlS9O792 / O0/ OOO, Valid from 4_12_2011, to 3-12-2012 )

¶18

spondents

¶19

cou n ser ror the Apperants : sRr RAMAc HAN D* J:Ht"ff

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI HARINATH REDDY SOMA

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 &2: ___

¶22

The Court delivered the following: Judgment

¶23

¶24

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶25

M.A.C .M.A.No.2866 of^2O16

¶26

JUDGMENT

¶27

Pursuant to the request made by the^{Counsel appearing} for both the parties, the matter was^{referredtc, Lok Adalat.} On 14.12.2024, the matter^was settled^{before the Lok Adalat} and an Award was^passed by the^{Lok Adalat.}

¶28

In view of the above, this Motor^{Accident Civil} Miscellaneous Appeal is disposed of in^{terms of the Award} passed by the Lok Adalat. There shall^{be no order as to costs.}

¶29

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications,^{if any, pending}

¶30

shall stand closed

¶31

SD/- MOHD. ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

v SECTION OFFICER

To,

Ill Additional District Judge-Cum-Chairman, Motor Vehicle Accidents Tribunal, Karimnagar(With records ,if any)

¶36

One CC to SRI RAMACHANDAR RAO VEMUGANTI, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI HARINATH REDDY SOMA, Advocate [OPUC]

¶37

Two CD Copies

¶38

ADK

¶39

t/^ong with a copy of Lok Adalat Award.

¶40

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMA,IITTEE (HtcH CO URT FOR THE STATE OF TEI-ANGANA, HYDERABAD) [Under Section 19 of the Legal Services Auth orities Act 1987 (Central Act)l Date: 14 -lz-zoz4

¶41

¶42

Present: 1. Hon'ble Justice Mrs.S.Nanda,

¶43

!i;tr
o
c1 HIGH COURT m-1J
LOK ADALAT
*
Staie ci1

¶44

(JudcF, Hon,bte HiSh court chairman for th€ state of ielangana) 2. Sri K. Venkatesh Gupta, Advocate, Member 3..Sri Srinivasa Srikanth, Advocdte, Member

¶45

o.ffiHffiffi%l.,r

¶46

AGAINST

¶47

(on the fe of 'r^Addionar'ffi!ffffiHan,

¶48

Motor Vehicre Accidenrs Tribunat, Karimnagar)

¶49

Between:

¶50

Anumatta @ Anumandal Ramesh, S/o. Narsaiahi, Age 45 years, Occ: Business, 2. Anumatla @ Anumandal prameeta Wr". ffirn Age: 40 years, Occ: Househotd.^-' "-"'e

¶51

f,:llHil;[,]i;?,fl;.o#;i:,1'''choppadandiVraseand

¶52

¶53

AND "'Appellants/Petitioners

¶54

1' Mudham Raju, s/o nro.nu,"p,liiti;;;ilBlil#:"ri'_1"#1,[,ffi,ii*"*, Karimnagar Distriit

¶55

' r:laj:ttriyr'1,-, q[il:: Y;::"''

¶56

ror,".' "i l"',.# d:lf iT. XJ lTi "rto5';;"r.,tnv^{Mandat in waranga} r Distric r,

¶57

'lt",,tl"::T,t"'Ji,oi:"J:l.l:::l:l."co,p,,vLim*ed,-."'i r ci i i L".o [;i,::]Tt":iLf !i,ijii,. u.,.n Near Siddi Vinavaka r"-i.^-i..il'-ll:i prabhadevi Mum-bai,I"'q, . Ataharastra St"["_qOJOu#pte,

¶58

{tnsurance valid from oc-^po(icy ti-zot No. r 3003 to ot_ / T M tz_z6iii' / 5gO7gZ / OO vv, / v\Jv,OOO.

¶59

Counsel for the Appeuants/ petitioners /c [a imants : sri ;.hr:fl:eJ[ilTlrT::J" Counset for Respondent No.2/ : sri K'Ajay Kumar, Advocate. lnsurance company

¶60

Representative of lnsurance Company : Sri Mohammed Abdut Shabbeer.

¶61

senior Manager t-"gur iLLi'

¶62

. This appear havine b hearing the Learned corn-ru,"9n referred for setttement before this Lok Adatat and after passed: tor the parties and atso the parties, $,. i"tir*#g ]*"rfr ,,

AWARD

Compensation Awarded bythe Tribunal	Rs.7,48,000i-(Rupees Sevenlakhsforty-eightthousandonty)with proportionateeosts [email protected]%p{annumfromthedate of petitiontit[realization.
Compensation Awarded (SetttementReached) intheLokAdatat. q- .1r:;131i1 H1GHCOURI LOI(ANATAT o ID ,?) i-	Thisisan appealfitedbythePetitioner/Ctaimantaggrievedbythe AwardpassedinMVOPNo.10of2014bythelllAdditionatDistrict Judge-Cum-Chairman, Motor Vehicte AccidentsTribunat,Karimnagar. SriMohammedAbdulShabbeer,SeniorManager-Legal Claimsfor theRespondent No-3-lnsurance Companyhas appearedbeforethe LokAdalatandtheAppettant/petitioner/CtaimantNos.1&2atong with theircounsel haveappearedbeforetheDistrictLegatServices Authority,Karimnagar. DuringthependencyofthisAppeat,the Petitioners/Appettants andtheRespondent l,lo.3-lnsuranceCompany haveenteredintoasetttementandinpursuanceofthesame, the Appettants/Petitionershaveagreedtorr:ceiveanamountof Rs.3,00,000/-(RupeesThreetakhsonty)towardsfu[[andfinal settlementinadditiontotheamount atready depositedandthe lnsuranceCompanyhas agreedtopaythesame.Accordingty, compromiseisrecordedandthecaseissettled beforethe LokAdatat. lnviewoftheabove saidsett[ement,thensurance Companyhas agreedtopaytheabovesaid amountwithinaperiodofone(1) monthfromthedateofreceiptofcopyofthisAward, after deductingtheamountthatwasdeposited,ifany.lntheeventof defauttordetayinmakingsuchdeposit,theCtaimant/Appettantis entitted toctaiminterestasawarded bytheTribunat.
AdditionalDirection(s): Apportionmentof Compensation,ifany	Theapportionmentbetween theAppetlant/Petitioner/Ctaimant Nos.1and 2shat[bemade asperthetermsof theawardpassedin M.V.O.P.No.10of7014by rhe Tribunat.

Compensation
Awarded
bythe Tribunal

Rs.7,48,000i-(Rupees Sevenlakhsforty-eightthousandonty)with
proportionateeosts [email protected]%p{annumfromthedate of
petitiontit[realization.

Compensation
Awarded
(SetttementReached)
intheLokAdatat.
q-
.1r:;131i1
H1GHCOURI
LOI(ANATAT
o
ID
,?)
i-

Thisisan appealfitedbythePetitioner/Ctaimantaggrievedbythe
AwardpassedinMVOPNo.10of2014bythelllAdditionatDistrict
Judge-Cum-Chairman, Motor Vehicte AccidentsTribunat,Karimnagar.
SriMohammedAbdulShabbeer,SeniorManager-Legal Claimsfor
theRespondent No-3-lnsurance Companyhas appearedbeforethe
LokAdalatandtheAppettant/petitioner/CtaimantNos.1&2atong
with theircounsel haveappearedbeforetheDistrictLegatServices
Authority,Karimnagar. DuringthependencyofthisAppeat,the
Petitioners/Appettants andtheRespondent l,lo.3-lnsuranceCompany
haveenteredintoasetttementandinpursuanceofthesame, the
Appettants/Petitionershaveagreedtorr:ceiveanamountof
Rs.3,00,000/-(RupeesThreetakhsonty)towardsfu[[andfinal
settlementinadditiontotheamount atready depositedandthe
lnsuranceCompanyhas agreedtopaythesame.Accordingty,
compromiseisrecordedandthecaseissettled beforethe
LokAdatat.
lnviewoftheabove saidsett[ement,thensurance Companyhas
agreedtopaytheabovesaid amountwithinaperiodofone(1)
monthfromthedateofreceiptofcopyofthisAward, after
deductingtheamountthatwasdeposited,ifany.lntheeventof
defauttordetayinmakingsuchdeposit,theCtaimant/Appettantis
entitted toctaiminterestasawarded bytheTribunat.

AdditionalDirection(s):
Apportionmentof
Compensation,ifany

Theapportionmentbetween theAppetlant/Petitioner/Ctaimant
Nos.1and 2shat[bemade asperthetermsof theawardpassedin
M.V.O.P.No.10of7014by rhe Tribunat.

¶67

The Appetlants/ctaimants are entitted to the refund of court Fee paid in this case. 2' The. arnount atready deposited by the rnsurance company, if any, shatt be given credit to.

¶68

soon^ after deposit by the rnsurance company, the Appettant/ petitioner/ctaimant Nos.j and 2 are permitted to withdraw their entire share amounts.

¶69

ln token of consent for the above setttement and award, the parties and their counsel have signed this awar:d in our presence. ln terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties, this case stands disposed of.

Ultc>---=--

!-rrrr::4-. .

L_r - ,) o-.tAo,., c. F-Jr)^t r-'
IY'\ t+c_F., A 2866 fl
[=o L5 rq']
1q
yop i
No: [o >-sr+, ri
sp[-,e[!el'l's (s) R.espoerdent (s) ii
RS- 3,o6, ooo-- r.r-r I
I
I
I
n-Kqnu,
l;
i
I
fi
rb&w
ii
--. I
I
I
GEI'IERAL ITJS it iI
c os q
E C ar D i
Eo E z il
(
5 I
l
i
I
)_ --.' ii

¶74

i
ri
ii
I
I
I
I
l;
i
I
fi
ii
I
I
I
I
iI
i
il
I
l
i
I
ii
f
l
I

¶75

Counsefi for t EA ,=Ji; iit {s) Counsel for the Res ondent (s)
Nr, r l*!^
k*
s- tvl tsE MEMBER
iiVre
(Seal of the Committee)
q:
o=O +
*
5,

¶76

5 I I

¶77

l I i I t I I Ii I I I I I I I I t l

¶78

¶79

¶80

tI! i , tt I :- ,i I I )

HIGH COURT

DATED:04 tOil2O2S

JUDGMENT

MACMA.No.2866 of 2016

¶85

..i
ilir: s
7
(-14.
--.<br>((
:aj
le)
ID 5 AIJE 2I[!
o
t,
,l)t^
--.-

¶86

DISPOSING oF THE IT,IAMCA IN TERMS oF THE AWARD PASSED BY THE LOi-AbiLAT WITHOUT COSTS

¶87

/b /,<br>(---'/ / 7
{4
+,t//z{

Anumalla , Anumandal Ramesh, Karimnagar Dist 7 Anr. v. M.Raju, Karimnagar Dist and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anumalla , Anumandal Ramesh, Karimnagar Dist 7 Anr. v. M.Raju, Karimnagar Dist and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Vs Bollepogu Meri , Meeramma and 2 Others

Galivadda Narsimulu Vs B.Kondal and Another

Dharavath Bhadru Vs Bherulal Bhill

Icici Lombard General Insurance Co.Ltd Vs Veerasarapu Narender

Chevulapalli Bhudaiah , Pedda Lachu Bhudaiah Vs R. Vittal and Another

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Nagilla Maraiah and 3 Ors.