Dismissed¶37

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nagilla Maraiah and 3 Ors.

Telangana HC4 Mar 2025MACMA/2022/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Telangana High Court, Hyderabad; M.G. Priyadarsini J; MACMA No. 2022 of 2017; decided 04-03-2025; United India Insurance Co Ltd (appellant/insurer) v. Nagilla Maraiah, Nagilla Shankar, Nagilla Priyanka (claimants) and Sainath Bore Wells (owner of Well Lorry No. AP 24 K 0819); appeal under S.173 Motor Vehicles Act against award in O.P.No.104 of 2015 dated 22.03.2017, MACT-cum-I Additional District Judge, Nalgonda; appeal DISMISSED; Rs.4,00,000/- apportionment among claimant father and children; lower court decree otherwise confirmed; no costs.

What did the court decide?

The Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. ¶21

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Nagilla Maraiah… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FIVE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI

¶5

MOTOR AC crD ENT CIVIL MIS CELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2o220F 2017

¶6

Between:

¶7

United lndia lnsurance Co Ltd, Branch Offce, Reddy Colony, Miryalguda Town, Nalgonda District. r9p . by its Braich Manager (policy No.0514023't 14p1 05s74693'Vatid irom zi.to.zoii'io' 23.1 o.roi5i-

¶8

...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT No.2

¶9

AND

¶10

Nagilla [Vlaraiah, S/o. Rama Swamy, age: 50 years, Occ: Cook

¶11

Nagilla Shankar, S/o. Maraiah, age:25 year, Occ: Student

¶12

Nagilla Priyanka, D/o. N4araiah, age: 20 year, Occ: Student

¶13

All are R/o. H.No.4-1O-SO7 lBl3, Maruthi Nagar, Mushampally Road, Nalgonda town, Nalgonda District -508 001.

¶14

RESPON DENTS/PETITIONERS

¶15

Sainath. Bore Weils, #28-j0^68, Near_Vignan High School, Miryatguda, Nalgonda District. rep b.y^it^s proprietor e. Muttryarn"neOOy 1-Ownei';i"$; Well Lorry No AP 24 K 0'819)

¶16

...RESPONDENT/RESpONDENT No.1

¶17

Appeal filed under section 'r73 of Motor vehicres Act., against the Judgment and decree, made in o.p.No. 104 oF 2015 dated. 22.03.2017 on the file of the chairman, Motor Accident craims Tribunar-cum- I Additionar District Judge, at Nalgonda.

¶18

This appeal coming on for hearing and upon perusing the grounds of appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the court berow and the materiar papers in the MVop and upon hearing the arguments of sRl. A MALATHI, Advocate for the appellant and of sri. ANNAPURNA SREERAM, counser for the Respondents 1 to 3 and of smt. D. MADHAVI, Counsel for the Respondent No.4.

¶19

¶20

This Court doth Order and^{Decree as follows:}

¶21

That the ttlotcr Accident^{Civil MiscellaneousAppc'albr:} r,rnd herebY ls Dismissed:

¶22

That the Resl;lndent^{No.1 awarded an amountof Rs} 4,00,000/-^as his legal

¶23

compensation shall^{beapportioned equally amrnrl} representatives/rlh^{ild ren i.e., respondentNos 2 & 3/ claimantlr os 2 & 3;}

¶24

That the^{resporldentsNo.2& 3/ClaimantsNos 2 8 3 'withr:rawthe entire} compensation^{awarded to them apart from the cotnpens ati :n awarded to} them apart^{froT r the compensation amount apporticrnedto their father i e''} ,

¶25

respondent No^{' /Claimant No'1}

¶26