Civil revision petition of 2009 challenging revenue orders concerning land in Manchal was listed for dismissal as petitioners had no representation on two occasions. The court presumed lack of interest and dismissed the revision for non-prosecution, closing pending miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 932 OF 2009
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution oflndia, praying setting aside the order of the Joint Collector -1, Ranga Reddy District, dt 04-10-08 made in Case No. F2l5480l2OO7 in confirming the Orders of the Tahsildar, dt 25-08-07, inproceedings No. A/2099/1998.
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
(Respondents Nos..'5 to'19 are impleaded as per Court Order I tted 20.10.2021 ,vide La.No1 of 2018 in CRP.No. 932 of 2009.
..-RESPONDENTS
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2009 CRPMP. NO: 1343 OF 2009
Petition filed under Order 39 Rule 1& 2 RAfu St'c'ion 151 of C.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit ',1 )d in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant inju rr tion restraining the respondents from alienating or creating any charge or altt'rrrg the nature of the lands bearing Sy Nos. 150, 152, 155, 163 to 168 &" 7 n all measuring Ac- 38-23 gts-, situated at Manchal (Village & Mandal) Ran.;:: Reddy District.
Counsel for the Petitioners :SRI BOYA RAVINDER REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4,6,8,9,13 &14 : SRI M N NARASIMHA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.10. : SRI G. RAIVIACHANDRA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 15 to 19 : SRI A.H. CHAKRAVARTHY
The Court made the following : ORDllti
:-Y
THE HONOURABLESMT. JUSTICEK. SUJANA
CTVIL REVISIONPETITION No.932 of2OO9
ORDER:
Since therewasno representation on behalfof petitioners on the earlieroccasion, the matter, which pertainsto 2O09'was directed tobe listedtoday under the caption 'For Dismissal'' Even today,there is norcprcsentationon behalf ofthe petitioners.It is presumedthat the petitionersare not intcrcsted to proceedwith the revision pctition'
Hence, the CivilRevisionPetition stancls disrnissed for
non- prosecution.
Miscellaneouspetitions,if any' pendingshall stand
closed.
SD/- MOHD.ISMAIL OEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:0710412025
,...:.
I
1$ I li,?s
...1 ,-,- -
ORDER
CRP.No.932 of 2009
DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PE'TITION FOR
NON PROSECUTION
q tr
o/oq,L c\ )
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ani Reddy Chandra Reddy (died) per LRs (A. Narasimha Reddy, A. Prabhakar Reddy, A. Srinivas Reddy)
The Joint Collector-1, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad
The Tahsildar, Manchal Mandal R.R. District
Smt. Chand Sultana
Ishrath Sulthana
Nasrath Sulthana
K. Sujana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
