Petitioners sought quashing of proceedings in CC No. 2621 of 2024 under Section 528 BNSS. The court observed disputed questions of fact required trial; counsel restricted the prayer to exemption from personal appearance, which was granted subject to representation by counsel on every hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3385 ]
\
IN THE HIGH COURTFORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAYOF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMIN AL PETITION NO: 4584OF 2025
Between:
...petitioners / Accused No.2 to6
AND
...ResPondents / ComPlainant
7
Petition unde r section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the I,Ienr,:'rndum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the l-1igh Court may be pleased to quzs h the cc No. 2621t2024 pending on tre fi e of Honble lll Additional Junio' rliril Judge-cum-lll Addl. Judicial lrlagistrate of First class, Ranga Reddy Di';trir; at L.B. Nagar agalnst the petition e rs/Ar;cu s,:d No. 2 to 6 tn the rnterest of ju s,t rcr I
l.A. NO: 2 OF 202t5
Petition urrd:' Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the lVlerrrorerndum of Grounds of criminal petiti,:n, the lligh court may be pleased to stay cf atl further proceedings in cc No 26.2l12024 pending on the file of Honble lrl Ac(litional Junior civil Judge-cum-lll Addl Judicial Magistrate of First class, Raroa Fl-.ddy dist at L.B.Nagar against the F,etitione s/Accused No. 2 to 6 includinc his :ppearance pending disposal of the [Vain er- ash petitron rn the interest of the 1L- s tice.
This Petrtr.. o()ming on for hearing, upon perusing the ll4,:morandum of Grounds of crimine I Petition and upon hearing the argurrenrs of sri r.p. Shailaja, Advoc:ate, 1c r the Petitioners and the public prosr:cutr>r (TG/Ap) on behalf of the Respo-r lent No..l .
The Court mader theFr:llowing Order:-
; I t i t I
ry.Z
THE HONOURABLESMT. JUSTICE K' SUJANA
CRIMINAI,PETITION No.45a4of.2o25
ORDER:
t t
This CriminalPetition ishled underSection528 BharatiYaNagarikSuraksha Sanhita (for short tsNSSJ to quash theproceedingsagainst the petitionersin C'C'No'2621 of 2024on the hie of the learned III AdditionalJunior Civii Judge-cum-IllAdditionalJudicial Magistrate of First Class' RangaReddY District
2
that the l:t: itioners are being represented by ,hetr corrnsel on
every da;.e cf hearing.
4 Aci,)riingly, the Criminal petition is disposeci ot.
lr4is,',: laneous appiications, if any pencling sh,lll also
stand c lc se c
SD/- I|JIOHD. ISMAIL DE]]UT'T REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECI'ION OFFICER
To,
VCI/gh
f
HIGH COrJtTt
DATED:041t0412025
ORDER
CRLP.No.45i84 ot 2025
:rlr_ s i4
o f,\l'
(J 1,tJiN ?ffi
O
,,<./' _i.
,,"/
DISPOSING OI. THE CRLP
@rtt
a '/''
6
2 issues framed by the court
Whether proceedings in CC No. 2621 of 2024 against the petitioners should be quashed.
Whether the petitioners' personal appearance before the trial court could be dispensed with.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Swapna Ulhas Kumar Shinde
Ulhas Vasantha Rao Shinde @ Ulhas Kumar Shinde
Sonal Shinde
Monal Shinde
Amit Sharma
The State of Telangana
K. Sujana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
