Dismissed¶¶37

The Commissioner v. G.Lava Kumar and 7 Others

Telangana HC31 Jan 2025CRP/5032/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRP No. 5032 of 2013; High Court for the State of Telangana; Justice N. Tukaramji; Article 227 Constitution of India; revision petition dismissed as infructuous; advanced stage of suit; parties submitted arguments before trial court; cause desolate; Commissioner Vikarabad Municipality v. G. Lava Kumar and others; O.S. No. 20 of 2013; I.A. No. 124 of 2013; Additional District Judge Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District; Section 151 CPC stay petition; no order as to costs; legal representatives impleaded 13.12.2024 (I.A. Nos. 3/2024 and 6/2024); decision date 31.01.2025.

What did the court decide?

Having regard to the advanced stage of the suit and as the parties proceeded with the suit, the cause in the present revision petition has become desolate and does not require adjudication. ¶¶35

The Commissioner Vs G.Lava Kumar and 7 Others — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

¶5

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:5032 OF 2013

¶6

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 24.09.2013 passed in LA. No. 124 ot 2013 in O.S. No. 20 ot 2013 on the file of the Court of the Additional District Judge, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District.

¶7

Between:

¶8

The Commissioner, Vikarabad Municipality, Ranga Reddy District.

¶9

... Petitioner/Defendant

¶10

AND

¶11

G.Lava Kumar, S/o Rachappa, Occ Advocate, R/o H.No. 4-2-121, Near NTR Chowrasta, Vikarabad.

¶12

Soma Narayana (DIED per LR Rg), (R9 is brought on record as LR of the deceased R2 as per Court Order dated 13.12.2024 vide lA. No. 3/2024 in CRp. No. 5032113)

¶13

P.Anjaneyulu, S/o Venkatesham, Occ Business, R/o H.No.4-2-68l1 , lsakhan Bagh, Vikarabad,

¶14

S.Chandra Reddy, S/o Rama Reddy, Occ Business, R/o Saidabad, Hyderabad.

¶15

ljack, S/o Yesurathnam, Occ Business, R/o H.No. 4-2-178, Old LIG Quarters, Vikarabad.

¶16

Briji Gopal Daga (Died per LR R'10, R10 is brought on record as Lrs of the deceased RG as per Court order daled 13.12.2024 vide l.A. No. 6/24 in CRP No.5032/2013),

¶17

S.Mallikarjun, S/o Veerapa, Occ Business, R/o H.No.4-4-135, Gandhi Colony, Vikarabad.

¶18

B.Srinivas Reddy, S/o Ranga Reddy, Occ Business, R/o Vikarabad.

¶19

Smt Bharathamma, Wo. Soma Narayana, Aged about 68 years, Occ Household, R/o. H.No. 4 - 2 - 118, Bhagat Colony, Vikarabad, Vikarabad District. (R9 lS BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LR OF THE DECEASED R2 AS PER C.O., DT.13t12t2024 V|DE tA.NO. 3t2024lN CRP.50322013)

¶20

i["

¶21

10.Sri Bajrang Lal Daga, S/o. Brij Gopal Daga, Aged about 43 years, Occ Business, R/o. H.No. 2 - 998/3, Kanyalal Bagh, Vikarabad, Vikarabad District. (R1O IS BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LR OF THE DECEASED R6 AS PER c.o., DT.13/12t2024VIDE |A.NO. 6/2024 tN CRP. 5032t2013)

¶22

... Res^po ndents/P laintiffs

¶23

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2OllICRPMP. NO: 6967 OF 2013)

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be^pleased to^grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.20 of 2013 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District pending disposal of the CRP.

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner : Ms. Gudipat Sharvani representing

¶26

Mr. Krishna Reddy Putta, Standing Counsel for Municipalities

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent : Ms. N. Srinidhi Reddy

¶28

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶29

¶30

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICEN. TUKARAMJI}

¶31

CIV!L REVISION^{PETITION No.5032 0F 2013}

¶32

ORDER

¶33

The present Civil Revision^{Petition is filed by the petitioner} aggrieved by the order^{and decreedated 24.09 2013 passedin} l.A. No.124 of^{2013 in O.S.No.2O of 2013, on the file of the} learned Additional^{District Judge, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy} District

¶34

Today, when the matter is^{taken up for hearing,} Ms. Gudipati Sharvani,^{learned counsel,representing Mr'} Kirshna Reddy Putta,^{learned StandingCounselfor} Municipalities appearing^{for the revision petitioner as well as Ms'} N.srinidhi Reddy,^{learned counselfor the respondents, submits} that during the^{pendency of the Civil Revision Petition,the} proceedings before the trial Court^{continued and the parties} have submitted^{their arguments.}

¶35

3 Having regard to the^{advancedstage of the suit and as} the parties^{proceededwith the suit' the cause in the present} revtston petition has become^{desolate and does not require}

¶36

¶37

adjudication Therefore, this civil Revision petition is dismissed

¶38

as infructuous. No order as to costs

¶39

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications if any, stands

¶40

closed

¶41

Sd/- V. HARI PRASAD AS S ANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

-----7

ECTION OFFICER

To,

1 The Additional District Judge, Vikarabad, Ranga Reddy District. 2 one CC to lVlr. Krishna Reddy Putta, Standing Counsel^for Municipalities [OPUC] one CC to tVls. N. Srinidhi Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 4 Two CD Copies

DL/plp

HIGH COURT

DATED:31/01/2025

ORDER

CRP.No.5032 of 2013